And this is just the first step. The playing team is next. It seems likely opportunity players will comprise almost the whole backline, be represented at prop, hooker and loosie. Those looking forward to seeing Kriel and Whiteley should consider one loosie spot of 4 has to be kept for Kolisi, maybe 2 to include Notshe....that means we can only pick 2 of Louw, Vermeulen, Kriel and Whiteley. And PSDT is being talked about as a possible 7.
I have rarely commented on this stuff. It is what it is. But what makes a 50% opportunity player mix right? If I felt the opportunity players in the consideration set were not getting an even chance, I would comment on it......if anything they are already getting a better than even chance.
Our young guys are going overseas because in positions like wing they are playing against a stacked deck. And then if they are a test consideration another wave of bias sweeps in....Coetzee says he certainly wouldn't choose his flyhalf or captain from the overseas ranks.
We all want our players to have an even chance......players like the Beast and Habana are the right example. Not Chili and a host of other players chosen over better alternatives.
There is no compelling need here. No kids that won't have food on the table if Marx was preferred to Scara. The country should be able to compete evenly with NZ and Oz, players should have a sense there is an even playing field. Above all black rugby players should have an uncompromised sense of achievement when they make the team
This is a move in the wrong direction and not one that serves any honorable purpose.


