Springbok Record Comparison

He plays well for the Bulls. I don't think anyone would argue against the numbers he puts up, but for the Boks, it just hasn't been working out. He was rampant against Scotland on debut and then the well dried up. He was pretty dire in his brief showings last year. Those famous stone hands botching a late Bok attack deep in England's half. I don't think he is in any way suited to modern test rugby. If he were in the 90s he'd probably be a hall of fame candidate. Born after his time. 

This is the thinking of a prejudiced idiot of the worst kind.    The man is just impossible to have a logical discussion with on any rugby issue.

The poor idiot forget about the Wales test where Bakkies was started as a lock and he buggered up so badly he was replaced by De Jager early,   After that the whole situation 

He is also the idiot who stated that Flippie was a better lock than De Jager - enough said.    

Prejudiced? I have clearly layed out the way of things for months. I have backed my words up. What have you produced? Zero, nil, nichts, nada, nic. Show me Lood's grand and marvellous body of work.

Flip as a better lock than Lood. We are talking about a player who outplayed his All Black peers in each and every encounter. He was so powerful that he was a big contributor to the last fearsome Bok pack that demolished all before it: 2013. He was sorely missed throughout the 2015 WC. Particularly against Wales and New Zealand, where Lood was left wanting. Again. Just as he was earlier in the season against Argentina.

Bakkies stuffed up so badly?

"The Springboks were particularly potent in their driving forward play and won the back-row battle at the breakdown hands down.

Robust driving play from the home pack paved the way for outstanding full-back Le Roux to chip ahead and Habana won the foot race to touch down, with Steyn converting from near the touchline.

Wales centre Jamie Roberts was then sin-binned for tackling Le Roux in the air, and the hosts took full advantage, scoring two tries in his absence as the driving line-out play for which they are renowned paid dividends.

Veteran captain Victor Matfield and lock partner Bakkies Botha were to the fore, allowing scrum-half Fourie du Preez to send number eight Vermeulen over."

When all is said and done, you can never reference anything specific. You make unverified, ambiguous claims with over-bearing emotional overtones. 

Yes he did and the game changed totally after de Jager came on.  You are welcome to wrote tripe - and you are welcome to be an idiot and pretend things happened that did not happen.   You even quoted the wrong test - the problem was the second Welsh test.   But then I also saw how Matfield was pushed out of mauls easily and landing on his backside beside mauls - i n the test you wrote the above quote for,   Was even worse in the second Welsh test.      

Yes he did and the game changed totally after de Jager came on.  You are welcome to wrote tripe - and you are welcome to be an idiot and pretend things happened that did not happen.   You even quoted the wrong test - the problem was the second Welsh test.   But then I also saw how Matfield was pushed out of mauls easily and landing on his backside beside mauls - i n the test you wrote the above quote for,   Was even worse in the second Welsh test.      

AO

Why do you not accept the fact - Andre ran rather s lowly away from his support players and whether the tackle on him was legal - which the referee judged to be the case  -  the Springboks could have drawn that test if Esterhuizen did not have a brain fart.

Mozart

In how many games was Du Toit the MOM in matches- both on test level and Super Rugby level?

he does not get that distinction without meritorious performances - but you do not want to see anything positive and tries desperately to find reasons to criticize the player.  Mopst of it is urtter BS thinking on your part.    

Mozart

In how many games was Du Toit the MOM in matches- both on test level and Super Rugby level?

he does not get that distinction without meritorious performances - but you do not want to see anything positive and tries desperately to find reasons to criticize the player.  Mopst of it is urtter BS thinking on your part.    

Mike, when you run towards your support, they are no longer your support. In any case, Damian and Kriel were right there to clean the ensuing ruck, had Andre not been taken out by that shoulder. Play broke down, and players are required to adapt. Andre avoided a turnover to the left. 

"but you do not want to see anything positive and tries desperately to find reasons to criticize the player."

There's a consistent pattern to how these discussions unfold: I'll say X, someone will say Y. I'll provide evidence for X, the other person will launch a personal attack. I ask questions about Y; they have no answers. I don't take Y seriously, the other person becomes more angry and flustered. 

You are most commonly that other person. 

They were at least 5 meters away from the tackle and was NOT RIGHT there.   That is a fact and you are talking utter rot as per normal.    

the Springboks could have drawn that test if Esterhuizen did not have a brain fart

Ehm, England was leading 12-11 at the time. How could the Boks have drawn the test?

Funny how there's no criticism of Papier's pass to nowhere that put the Boks on the back foot in the first place. And funny how you still choose to nail a Bok player to the wall instead of focusing your anger on the real issue - a clear penalty to the Boks that wasn't called by a ref who didn't have the balls to penalize the home team with a potential match decider in front of a packed home stand.

There was no penalty given and the test was lost - and if you look at the way Esterhuizen was jogging with the ball - he isolated himself completely.   

That's another one to the list: The Boks lost the game because Erasmus was jogging with the ball. 

Hands-on coaching.

Here you go Lügnerin, the photographic evidence exposing your lies. In the first image, Esterhuizen is picking the loose ball off the ground. He wasnät a designated runner. Damian and Jantjies were behind a four man pod in the middle of the field. The ball was going to one of the pod runners, either Lood or Duane. However, the ball bobbles along the ground and passed a passive Jantjies. Andre has the English cutting him off before he even touches the ball. So he runs into the space to the right. As we can clearly see, Pollard and Kriel are already on that side of the field. 

Here we see Esterhuizen run in front of Pollard into the space between Pollard and Kriel. He is then hit in the head, knocking him to ground right in front of three Englismen. He had support for a clean in a legal tackle.

Too far away to prevent a turnover  - liair and dim c u n t.   The dimmest jog I have seen on a rugby field for years.  You said there  where Springboks to d ball protection.  I count 5 English players closer to where Esterhuizen fell than the two nearest Springboks.  That is what is meant by a player "isolating" himself.

When will you ever l earn anything about rugby?  

I thought the dumbest jog was Damian's escort in the 2015 All Black WC test, or maybe it wasn't a jog...

Liar personified - no body bar the ignorant blame De Allende for following Nonu who ran across the field and De Allende followed him and tackled him.  This became a story because of the stupidity of Mozart and you being even more idiotic followed suit. 

Damian De A-Landy Marshalling Services, as approved by Ma'a Nonu:

"Mate, I used De A-landy no agro. Got me a flippin World Cup medal bro. At first there was some turbulence getting to the line, but Damo cushioned my landing. First class gets a nice back-rub too. We'll definitely be using De A-landy in Japan." 

And Nonu was subbed early in the RC test that year when facing De Allende who ran through him at will.   What a load of ignorant crap you come up with.   

Coming soon to a cinema near you, "40 Metres of Trouble". 

Lies as per normal counts and the attack are on the same players by the village idiots.   Clueless as per normal/ .  

And Nonu was subbed early in the RC test that year when facing De Allende who ran through him at will.

Why was he subbed?  because he missed tackles on the scrummie?    That is what your BS explanation was coming too.      

Why was he subbed?  because he missed tackles on the scrummie?    That is what your BS explanation was coming too.      

because he missed tackles on the scrummie?

Ahem. No, Nonu didn't miss tackles on the scrummie. The NZ scrummie missed tackles on DA.

"Leeesten proppaly", as our former state president would say.

You are talking crap as per normal hence the need to quote from Zuma - birds of a feath er flock together, 

Didn't you work for Zuma (according to you) ? I recall something about you being big mates with him, helping him buy a house. Or something along those lines.