FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Stormers exit and…

Stormers exit and…

Started by Mozart69 REPLIES7,718 VIEWS· 09 Jun 2024, 04:08
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
09 Jun 2024, 04:08
#1
09 Jun 2024, 04:08#1

…..can anybody now doubt, Manie Libbok simply can’t be the Bok kicker. And on another note if Moerat was a yellow, how the blue blazes was Cane a red.

KI
kingcornPro3,695 posts
09 Jun 2024, 05:39
#2
09 Jun 2024, 05:39#2

Didn’t see the game, but caught the highlights. Looks like Manie still has the same BMT issues. Not a bok 

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
09 Jun 2024, 06:08
#3
09 Jun 2024, 06:08#3

Ofcourse he's a bok, just not a Springbok...

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
09 Jun 2024, 06:51
#4
09 Jun 2024, 06:51#4
It was very windy Cane definite red Moerat plenty of evidence for the yellow
KI
kingcornPro3,695 posts
09 Jun 2024, 07:27
#5
09 Jun 2024, 07:27#5

Question, is time to relegate Libbok. He’s been in the system for some time now and got his break after his 3rd lifeline from a desperate Stormers that was bankrupt and had no budget for players. 

He bombed at the World Cup, them Lost last years URC final with a performance. Played really poorly all season away from home, actually for 2 seasons now and then just couldn’t get any ascendancy in this game at all. Probably an exhibition player. 

We have better 10s. If I was Dobbo I would give Mattee and Fineberg a crack next season and stop banking on Libbok. The stormers needed to win 1 game away from home and Libbok just simply can’t play up north. 

I would have serious questions if Rassie selects him for the wales test at twickenham given his performance 

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
09 Jun 2024, 08:08
#6
09 Jun 2024, 08:08#6

Manie is a fine player, but should not be the kicker at test level.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
09 Jun 2024, 08:54
#7
09 Jun 2024, 08:54#7
Libbok is brilliant at creating for others - kicking for poles in shit conditions certainly does not define him as a player It’s like trying to say Morne Steyn was a great rugby player but in fact all he could do was kick - the rest of his game was bog ordinary
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
09 Jun 2024, 11:55
#8
09 Jun 2024, 11:55#8

Libbok is also a poor defender. As for the conditions excuse…Horne 5/0 puts paid to that argument. The same argument you used when Manie hooked a potential match winning kick a few weeks back.

Manie 0/4. He cant kick under pressure, it’s obvious.and his defense is sub par. That leaves us with his running game which is a joy to watch, but containable at test  level.

If he is going to play for the Boks somebody else needs to do the kicking.

KI
kingcornPro3,695 posts
09 Jun 2024, 14:48
#9
09 Jun 2024, 14:48#9

Morne wasn't a bad player, but his defence let him down too. He actually got better the older he got. 

Manie on the other hand struggle under heavy conditions. His attacking game become ineffective like we saw against England when he got yanked after 30 min because he couldn't get his kick to work nor could he rely on his foot work. 

He has the highest ball turn over in contact. He is almost guaranteed to lose the ball in contact.

So we play against NZ in NZ, no chance the Boks will have to win

PA
PakieCaptain17,321 posts
09 Jun 2024, 15:57
#10
09 Jun 2024, 15:57#10

Morne wasn't a bad player, but his defence let him down too.

I did a rundown of Morne's test stats years ago. His tackling success was in the deep 80 percent if I recall correctly, right on par with the likes of Carter. His worst defensive figures was in his last few tests, otherwise he would probably have ended a 90 percenter. That's better tackle success than, for example, DDA.

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
09 Jun 2024, 18:16
#11
09 Jun 2024, 18:16#11
Elton was a better defender and kicker than Manie. Those are just facts. Yet he was called mercurial and unreliable...and prone to flaking in big games. He got that label and few ever looked past it at what his actual numbers were. Point is, if Elton wasn't good enough then Manie for sure ain't either. I made a post recently where I pointed out that Manie is now a year older than Pollard was in the 2019 WC final. And it's difficult to shake that bit of perspective. I know it's an early call, but Manie doesn't seem to be improving. I feel he hit his ceiling a couple of years back. Perhaps he has a future as a utility back for the Boks, but there are so many... Now we've got a tough series, with a depleted squad, against the Irish. Who trusts Manie to control the game if Pollard goes down? I'm not sure I do. Pity, one had hopes for him.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
09 Jun 2024, 19:08
#12
09 Jun 2024, 19:08#12
Bullshit we have seen Manie land massive pressure kicks. Horne is used to the conditions at home Morne was useless - Jantjies was a far far better player
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
09 Jun 2024, 20:16
#13
09 Jun 2024, 20:16#13

And yet Morne won two Lion series and two Super Rugby series. Accomplishments Jantjies and Libbok could only dream about.


SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
09 Jun 2024, 21:21
#14
09 Jun 2024, 21:21#14
Morne won nothing, the team did the winning
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
09 Jun 2024, 23:23
#16
09 Jun 2024, 23:23#16
Who won the penalty in the first place? Morne or the team?
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
09 Jun 2024, 23:51
#17
09 Jun 2024, 23:51#17

The team won the penalty, but from that distance even without Lions’ series pressure, one in ten kicks would have made it. Morne won the Lions’ series

PA
PakieCaptain17,321 posts
10 Jun 2024, 04:43
#18
10 Jun 2024, 04:43#18
Morne was useless - Jantjies was a far far better player

You have got to be kidding. Jantjies was a deer in the headlights in most of his tests.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
10 Jun 2024, 06:22
#19
10 Jun 2024, 06:22#19
No the team won the Lions series not an individual, same applies to the WC Jantjies was a far far better rugby player than the utterly useless Morne Steyn
PA
PakieCaptain17,321 posts
10 Jun 2024, 08:16
#20
10 Jun 2024, 08:16#20

A good provincial player who amounted to little at tes t level - unlike Morne.

BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
10 Jun 2024, 08:34
#21
10 Jun 2024, 08:34#21

Jantjies & Libbok ....................sadly


crack ......................................

BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
10 Jun 2024, 08:46
#22
10 Jun 2024, 08:46#22

Hi Becs

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
10 Jun 2024, 08:59
#23
10 Jun 2024, 08:59#23
Morne was useless - Jantjies never had investment at test level given the presence of Pollard
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
10 Jun 2024, 09:56
#24
10 Jun 2024, 09:56#24
Elton had a phenomenal kicking record. #facts
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
10 Jun 2024, 10:24
#25
10 Jun 2024, 10:24#25
Jantjies vision was also second to none - his ability to put players into space was phenomenal. Great hands and an amazing kick pass He lacked the hard edge initially but fronted up more as he got older He was twice the rugby player Morne ever was. Morne has only been defined by his success at poles - the rest of his game was bog ordinary when it came to attacking and he was always shit scared of contact
BE
becsPro4,378 posts
10 Jun 2024, 13:56
#26
10 Jun 2024, 13:56#26

Hello Blob  

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
10 Jun 2024, 15:38
#27
10 Jun 2024, 15:38#27

Morne had a similar strike rate to Dud Allende:

Morne….68 tests/8 tries

After 68 tests….Dud Allende, the best 12 the game has ever seen and a consensus pick for the team of the universe … had scored 9. 

Hence Morne has to be one of the best attacking fly halves in the known universe?

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
10 Jun 2024, 15:44
#28
10 Jun 2024, 15:44#28
Wow one would swear the merits of an inside centre were measured by the number of tries he scores Rugby ignorance shines bright It’s on par with a blindside beating defenders and effecting turnovers
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
10 Jun 2024, 18:19
#29
10 Jun 2024, 18:19#29

Inside centers should score tries, not as much as wing, scrum half and hooker….but up there.  Blindsides should be able to beat defenders ….otherwise their runs are toothless, like Dud Toit.

And every player should be able to effect a turnover…..some just have more opportunities. And Dud Toit had several in the WC he bottled.


SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
10 Jun 2024, 18:47
#30
10 Jun 2024, 18:47#30
Nonsense inside centres are there to create or set up phases not to score tries - scoring tries is a bonus. Same applies to all current test 12’s in the last 5 years or so. No you don’t see 2m players effecting turnovers - have you seen Eben, Lood, Mostert or RG effecting turnovers - no - PSDT is no different Bullshit are blindsides expected to beat defenders they are there to take it up in contact - PSDT is the best in the business at that - nothing toothless about that You want to see toothless - queue powder puff Mostert trying to take it up in contact
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
10 Jun 2024, 21:52
#31
10 Jun 2024, 21:52#31
Gee I guess nobody told Bundi who was the third highest try scorer at the RWC…what utter balls that all a center is thinking about is creating tries. Great centers also score tries.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
10 Jun 2024, 22:21
#32
10 Jun 2024, 22:21#32

O Driscoll …47 tries

Umaga 36 tries

Fourie 32 tries

Greenwood 31 tries

Guscott 31 tries

Horan 30 tries

Sella 30 tries

Jean de Villiers 27 tries

Gerber 19 tries….in 24 tests

……

And then we have Dud Allende with 11 tries in 78 tests. 

…..

Centers score plenty of tries. Dud doesn’t…..he is the opposite of Arendse, who sees the opportunity and executes instantly. Dud sees nothing and so he is just a process player. The attempt to teach him tactical kicking is embarrassing, resulting in two woeful tactical kicks in the final. All about the kick, zero about the result

….

So please no more about centers not scoring tries.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
10 Jun 2024, 23:04
#33
10 Jun 2024, 23:04#33
Aki had a good 12 months he did fuck all before that Your list contains players who played ages ago I’m talking last 5 years and you have a number of 13’s on your list 12’s are creators, 13’s finishers List the test 12’s over the past 5 years and give me the number of tries they have scored in the last 5 years and you will find the numbers are low and pretty similar against the top tier nations It’s just a simple fact of modern test rugby
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
11 Jun 2024, 01:28
#34
11 Jun 2024, 01:28#34

I see…rugby changed five years ago. Now inside centers don’t score tries. Except:

Tuilagi 10 tries in 32 games….twice Dud’s rate.

Kerevi 10 tries in 49 games….one and a half times Dud’s rate

Tuisova 11 tries in 23 tests….three and a half times Dud’s rate

Bundi  16 tries in 56 matches….twice Dud’s rate

Jordie Barrett 4 tries in 12 matches….2022 through now, when he played12….two and a half times Dud’s rate.

North 4 tries in 17 matches 2022 through now…1.8 times Dud’s rate

Manu 5 tries in 12 matches… 3 times Dud’s rate

…  and just for your enjoyment Adi Jacob’s 7 tries in 34 tests….one and a half times Dud’s rate.

……………..

Well there you have it. Dud is hopeless at scoring tries….even more hopeless at creating tries. A dead end,



SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
11 Jun 2024, 08:43
#35
11 Jun 2024, 08:43#35
Yes the game has changed considerably in the last 5 years and your stats are overall not in the last 5 years You miss the point - inside centres hardly score test tries these days - that’s a fact Their role has changed - they are all built like flankers who operate in traffic Useless Adi Jacobs played before the war and he was a useless 13 not a 12 Try again Moz
DA
Devil's AdvocatePro7,008 posts
11 Jun 2024, 09:30
#36
11 Jun 2024, 09:30#36

"Yes the game has changed considerably in the last 5 years"

Not really Dave... well, not in this specific regard that you are referring to here.

There is actually only a difference of two tries scored from 2014 to 2018 and 2019 to 2023 by the top 11 international inside centres that played during these periods.

However ...

What is very interesting to note though, is that according to the stats produced by ChatGPT when I requested certain information on the ratios of tries from inside centres compared to all other playing positions, from 2014 - 2023.... apparently only 2% of tries are scored by inside centres... compared to all other rugby playing positions.....and this is an approximation based on the general amount of international rugby tries scored annually by all positions.

Maybe Moz can confirm if these stats hold any water..... I know that's his speciality

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
11 Jun 2024, 11:20
#37
11 Jun 2024, 11:20#37
That’s my point though - the role of a 12 has changed considerably in the last 5 years or more. Gone of the creative stepping types to the big physical ball carrying types It’s this very reason de Allende is so good at 12, it’s not the flash stuff of 10 years ago. It’s all about carrying in traffic and de Allende is a physical freak. He makes metres in traffic, he draws defenders in. All the anti DA’s are stuck in a time warp, they ignorantly judge him on how inside centres played years ago. Just look at the current test 12’s they are all 110kg plus - de Allende, Esterhuizen, Tuilagi, Lawrence, Tuipolotu, Kerevi, Aki, Danty etc - there is a clear pattern here - hardly the fleet of foot steppers now are they Stick with Dave
DA
Devil's AdvocatePro7,008 posts
11 Jun 2024, 11:48
#38
11 Jun 2024, 11:48#38

"That’s my point though - the role of a 12 has changed considerably in the last 5 years or more. Gone of the creative stepping types to the big physical ball carrying types",

You might believe that, but the stats themselves that I presented, show that the last 5 years, and the 5 years prior to that, show almost no difference at all in the amount of tries scored from this specific position.... in fact from 2014 - 2018 I think it was 48 tries, and it was 50 tries for the next 5 years after that for the exact same position.

What I really found interesting was the 2% ratio of tries scored by inside centres compared to all other positions..... I wouldn't have thought it was that low.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
11 Jun 2024, 12:18
#39
11 Jun 2024, 12:18#39
Well for me it makes sense that 12’s score less tries given their role and positioning from structured play. They are there to create and distribute close to the source be it line out, scrum or maul. They are not the finishers nor are they the ones who take it up close to the line which usually involves forwards So it makes perfect sense to me - their opportunity to score tries probably comes from broken play as with any player
MP
MpowerPro5,061 posts
11 Jun 2024, 12:46
#40
11 Jun 2024, 12:46#40
They are there to create and Distribute…..DDA is not one of them….all that he does is take the ball up and forms rucks….the play has effectively stopped, as soon as Allende gets the ball….and because 12,s supposedly score less tries, doesn’t mean that DDA is a better player ….this reasoning is just a silly excuse to justify Dud,s poor play….I hope he leaves soon!!
↓ LOAD MORE (page 2 of 2)

More from Rugby