Stormers versus hapless Highlanders

 Well when you think you can play all these microlights and still win!!!!Fancy letting Cloete go or Van Wyk. Not to mention the overseas exodus every season. It's an impossible situation.SA Rugby is going down the tubes much to the glee of rooitwiterrbug, wee cc and their wee kiwi friends.It appear Rassie wont come home either! How low will we go before there is a change of course one wonders. 
Its tennis semi final time!

 After last week's debacle I thought. 'we're bad but ffs. we aint that bad ....... I was wrong, we are bad . Very bad .

 Sounds like a painful game for the wee stormers & their fan. I will watch the game now.

 Good try for the wee stormers & off to a good start ... what could possibly go wrong

 Whoops, Landers score a try through the backs & loose forwards. Osborne scores & the game is tied up after 11 mins. A competitive game so far.

 "Fleckie needs to give another big halftime speech."
Fleck and big speech mentioned in one sentence? Priceless.

 Penalty against the stormers for a line   out problem. Ref interpreted the law correctly but t'was unfortunate.

 Some good skill by the wee stormers full back but a quick opportunistic try by Landers. Men & boys situation emerging.

 Ref unfairly penalizes the Landers... when will we get a fair ref?

 Landers execute a rolling maul & score a try. This is starting to look like a schooling for the wee stormers. 
Beeno this was a good opportunity for you to see how rugby should be played. I hope you learned something?

 Ref calling the Landers off side When will a kiwi team get a decent break from a ref. I agree with Beeno something has to be done

 Landers are pushing the envelope and winning turnover ball. Osborne gives a fantastic offload for another try.
Wee stormers are cooked. Congrat & commiserations to the wee stormers. They will need to do better than this against kiwi teams.

 Another hammering. Yet the same excuses as ever.

 Naholo scores a fantastic try off a series of lucky bounces for the Landers. However, it is also the skill level of the Landers that is making their luck. Try at 56 min mark.

 
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaaaaa!!!

That's 9 trys to go with the 12 of the last two matches. In other words the Stompies are leaking an averaging of 7 trys per match.

Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahaaaa!!!

And ol PussyWhipped thinks that Fleckie is the man for the job!!!!

Me thinks its best you stick with tennis Beandip!!! Rugby's clearly no a strength of yours.


 

 Damn this is embarassing, a Landers forward (Wheeler) does a grubber & the bounce is good and it's another try. Great skills.

The Stormers were disgusting and here is no way a team can use a collection of midgets on the wing and at full back.   The defense of the midgets were despicable and it shows that the Stormers will always suffer if they have to use Kolbe and Leyds on the wing.   Both should play sevens rugby - they are just not physically up to standard.  
Other than the outside backs  the loosies - with the exception of Du Toit was piss poor as well,   They are just not up to standard.   The Stoprmers w ill have to find proper wings and loosies before one can take them serious as a team.   At this stage they are disgusting. 

 CC, pis terwyl jou blaas vol is....Stormers are bad ATM, enjoy.

 
I had 2 decades of it with the Lions ... but ... I doubt we ever averaged 7 trys a match scored against us.

So yeah ...

Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!

It's your turn now.

To think they want to get rid of the Cheetahs and the Kings ... when there's a perfectly good team of midgets that are far more qualified to be cast aside.

LOL!!!!!!!!!

 Hold up guys, stormers did not suddenly become a useless team. IMO they had a bad day, they didn't play well & the ball seemed to always bounce well for the Landers.
Problem is the Canes are next. Things will look better when stormers play SA teams again.

 Allow me to interject with some Lions bias...

Kolisi and Eben are the two top candidates from the Stormers for the Bok skipper's job.

Where were they today?

The further we get into the season the more evident it becomes that as far as players within SA, there is but one true contender for the Bok job .

 
And his name is ... ???

Now everybody ... say it after me ...

Warren Whiteley!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
JW ... I realise you don't really know much about the game ... and hardly watch anything anyway so let me just fill you in.

The Stormers had a bad day 3 weeks ago ... 4 trys to 1.

They had another very bad day last weekend ... 8 tries to 3

And they've just had an awful day with 9 tries to 2.

It's not a once off as your trying to imply.

Try to wake up will you.

 Kolisi is not a Bok. Car should not be a Stormer. Cloete should be the next name after Eben in the Bok side.

 
Don't forget Beast.

He's a must ... heart condition and all ... and even though he's 32 I'm sure we can retain his services for a few more years.

The other 7 superior loosehead props in the country can always go abroad to ply their trade there.

 Ha ha, wee cc trying to be assertive.

 
Just trying to help the ignorant copier and paster.

The one who reads up on what's happened ... and then tries to impress us by pretending to understand what was actually written ... meantime back at the ranch the poor dweeb still has his thumb up his arse.

Let me know if I can be of assistence again.

 Ah JW I see you were trying to spread a soothing balm on the wee Stompies fans .Who have now become the long suffering wee Stompies fans ! JW ,kind hearted to a fault !

Hi Wardad, ha ha, yes but poor wee cc is too thick to see it. In his case I will give up on trying to help the helpless

Well if the stormers were going to win one game this trip it was going to be that one. Looks like the gap is just getting bigger between NZ and SA rugby. If the Canes fire for 80 minutes we might see our first 100 point game next week

Crusadersfan, I'm afraid there's no nice way to say this without offending you so I'll have to just be blunt and say it . . . you're sounding a little bit like a Stompie Blowhard (aka Stormers supporter).
Sorry, I know that's highly insulting but - like the Blowhards - you seem to also be under the impression that just because the Hapless Stompies are a truly pathetic rugby team that all the South African teams must be weak as well. That's what the Blowhards say as well but you all seem to have short memories.
Last season it was the SA conference containing the Lions and the Sharks who played the New Zealand sides. The Lions beat 4 of the 5 New Zealand side last year on their way to the final while the Sharks beat both the Highlanders and the Hurricanes. 
Just because you lot get to play the useless Bulls and the Hapless Stompies this year doesn't mean all our sides are that bad.

  "....yes but poor wee cc is too thick to see it."
Glad I'm not the only one who thinks he's a blithering idiot. Best he sticks to being the board toughie.

 Rooinek I dont care what you think, all I know is Beeno living in misery and thats good enough for me

Whooooooooosh!!!

 Beeno very happy to be proved right regarding his pre season analysis of the stormers team. The flaws were obvious and one expected them to be exploited.
If only they would just pay close attention to Beeno.Stormers may be poor but they still beat the wee chiefie s. bwahahahahahahhahaha

 The Chiefs just showed that they are at best the 4th ranked Kiwi side and the way they are playing I would expect the Blues to run them close if not win.
They are playing poor rugby at the moment so don't read to much into that win but I do have to thank the Stormers for doing the Crusaders a big favour in beating them.

crustie fan the favour was completele y incidental!

 Beeno, may I remind you that you are a wee stormers fan The latest "Trum@pian" distraction of how "brilliant" you were in predicting the hapless performance of your team is just that a distraction. 
Only hope you have is to come over to the dark side - if we will have you. Maybe we need a Mozart like poll of the kiwis on this site to see if we want you. What could possibly go wrong?