Stormers vs Cheeeefs!
Too late.. make that three tries and 40 points the better.
Pathetic Stormers - even much worse than the Sharks who had to travel and play in really bad weather...
I have said since the season start Bongi, Ntubeni, Carr, Kolisi and Notche are not really up. Bongi and Ntubeni make the Bok squad. Marx and Akkers are left out.FACE FACTS SA RUGBY IS IN A DREADFUL STATE. ONLY THE LIONS ACQUIT THEMSELVES DECENTLY.
In the sad end this is a HUGE message to Stormers. get rid of dead wood. next if you want to compete pick On merit. Go for excellence or perish.
As things stand only one SA plays proper rugby, the Lions. Richer unions like Bulls, Sharks and Stormers are playing poor rugby with limited skills.
Next season more payers head north.
Chiefs were too good today, at least the wee stormers got off to a good start. Koch scored two tries, that's worth something.
It is Heyneke Meyer 's fault.
Being sent on the road, losing Liam Messam to ineligibility and yet more men to injury - nothing seems to faze these Chiefs.
Dave Rennie's side this morning booked their first semifinal berth since 2013, crushing the Stormers in Cape Town to make a mockery of the adversity they were facing.
The next challenge will be their toughest yet - a trip to Wellington to face the red-hot Hurricanes with a spot in the Super Rugby final on the line. And the difficulty level could yet be raised, given Stephen Donald (shoulder) and Sam Cane (possible concussion) both prematurely left the field.
But the Chiefs have remained unbowed by a mounting injury toll this season, so they're unlikely to start worrying now, especially with the way their attack was firing at Newlands.
The Stormers might be traditionally difficult to break down, and they might have come into the clash with the third-best defensive record in the competition, but that counted for nothing in their first sight of a Kiwi side all season.
It was difficult to guess where the Stormers, in hindsight, would fall on the issue. On one hand, playing New Zealand teams would have undoubtedly left them better prepared for meeting one in the playoffs.
On the other, based on the ease with which the Chiefs ran through them, a success of games against Kiwi opposition would have likely curtailed their campaign well before the post-season.
The Stormers were simply unable to cope with the varying attributes to Chiefs brought to their attacking play, attributes that have been on display throughout the season.
In scoring four first-half tries and racing to a lead they wouldn't lose, the Chiefs' skill set was astonishing, their catch and pass on a different level to what the Stormers were accustomed.
They attacked with pace and verve and, as has been the case all year, their support play is what truly set them apart. Because for every seemingly impossible pass from Damian McKenzie - and there were three in the first 40 minutes alone - the fullback needed a teammate in the right place to maximise on the exchange.
There were some initial concerns for the Chiefs - they certainly didn't want the game to degenerate into a set piece battle, while the Stormers' physicality made them a threat on their rare forays inside the opposition 22.
But all of that was quickly forgotten every time the visitors had the ball in their hands.
Whether it was Brad Weber dancing around the fullback or James Lowe winning the chase for his own prod down the sideline, the Chiefs appeared unstoppable when in the mood.
It was breathless stuff and it extended to their defensive effort, placing an emphasis on line speed and building pressure at the collision. And, worryingly for the Stormers, that led to errors and turnovers, which is often when the Chiefs are at their most dangerous.
Vincent Koch's second on the stroke of halftime - and Cane's subsequent substitution - gave the home side some hope of mounting an unlikely comeback. But once the Chiefs' scrum demolished their counterparts to set up a score for McKenzie, that was virtually extinguished.
But, even with the game sealed, the Chiefs simply refused to relent, crossing for three tries in the final three minutes to leave Rennie wryly shaking his head.
Bring on the Hurricanes.
Stormers 21 (Koch 2, Carr tries; du Preez 2 cons, Thomson con)
Chefs 60 (McNicol, Weber, Sanders, Lowe, McKenzie, Elliot, Koloamatangi, Kerr-Barlow tries; McKenzie 2 pens, 7 cons)
Halftime: 14-34
Sadly for the Stormers there were not a lot of stand-out players. Schalk (for his age) played at 110% - Groom is slow, de Allende is useless and the whole backline are clueless. Notche, I think, is better than Kolisi but the Stormers loosies are too slow to get to the loose ball and ineffective in the ruck and mauls..
Chiefs are even missing some star players.. They have a very good chance to walk away with the spoils this year..
Lions will play the Landers, that will be a tough game even for the Lions. Landers have traveled so much I wonder if they know the way home.
Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1635RE: Stormers vs Cheeeefs!
July 23, 2016, 21:03:12
Beano, there aint many black fellas in the useless Stormers backline, of hoe?
Silly to extrapolate simply the players Beeno selected - as I said there are some pathetic performances by players who are supposed to be Springboks..
But, as bad as the Stormers were, so good were the Chiefs - they played like they were playing against real competition..
Go Chiefs!!
Man of the match: Schalk Burger tried his heart out, but a times he looked like a lone ranger. There was some good intent from other Stormers, but execution was shocking. You can out almost the entire Chiefs team forward, especially those skilful backs - like Sam McNicol, Anton Lienert-Brown, James Lowe and Brad Weber. However, it was the creative ability of Chiefs fullback Damian McKenzie - who had a hand in several of their tries - that stood out above all.
McKenzie continues to amaze.
...Bean Brain you dopey yarpy, no need for any racist rants mate.... Notche was actually one of the better players on the paddock and Carr scored a try as a late substitution...Koch also cementing a spot in the Bok front row with that performance,.. but unfortunately for you yr backs just could'nt compete , they were completely outclassed ,totally , utterly and comprehensively...it was a masterclass...Chiefs take a bow...
"@Ceradyne, WTF has Meyer got to do with rugby in SA now? That is water under the bridge. His last Franchise is still the most successful in the SR competitions, but for now he has no influence, other than in some one's feeble twisted mind."
Uhmmm. That was actually TIC, aimed at a few lunatics around here. I could have dragged in Matfield, Morne and Frans Steyn and maybe Gurthro Steenkamp as well, but that would have made it too obvious.
As for Koch, he did a great job scoring two tries, but his trademark scrumming problems were enough in evidence to underscore his challenges at test level.
Our backs were outclassed. Du Preez is still feeling his way back....Allende is a sieve and Zas makes a ton of mistakes. Primarily though it was the Chiefs ability to get one final man left over that made the first two and last two tries....and distinguished them from the Stormers who couldn't even support the few breaks they made.
Stormers Canes
Meters gained 495 519Clean breaks 7 9Carries 128 87Defenders beaten 23 16Passes 166 123Offloads 11 8
Looking at these attack stats you would have no idea the Canes thrashed Beeno's Stormers. The Chiefs were just much more effective on attack. They also were far more effective in strategic kicking.
Defence
TacklesStormersComparisonChiefs7438.5%61.5%118Missed TacklesStormersComparisonChiefs1641%59%23Turnovers WonStormersComparisonChiefs550%50%5
Canes are favorites; Landers are second; Lions third and Chiefs last.
These odds may change based on injury reports, etc.


