Team of the series
By the way I think there may have been something amiss with Pollard on Saturday - hence the selection of Steyn to back him up. I do htink in the RC we re likely to see retention of the 6-2system on the bench.
I would have picked Henshaw ahead of Dud Allende….other than that and the fact that Marx had limited game time, I can’t quibble with this team.
So the stats for the two tests ….
Henshaw makes 15 out of 16 tackles
Dud makes 14 out of 16 tackles.
Henshaw gains 56 metres in 13 carries for an average 4.3 metres per carry…with two clean breaks.
Allende gains 76 metres in 25 carries for an average of 3.0 metres per carry….with no clean breaks.
Now Allende did beat 3 defenders to Henshaw’s 1….but none of those amounted to a hill of beans with no clean breaks. Just tractoring.
Another dismal set of stats for Dud Allende. Imagine zero clean breaks in 2 tests.
And by the way Henshaw beat 5 defenders and made another clean break on Saturday.
Allende beat one defender…no breaks, not one for the whole series.
So in the whole series Henshaw outdid him in defenders beaten 6 to 4…..outdid him in clean breaks 3 to 0…..and outgained him by more than a metre per carry.
Case closed.
How does the stats reflect DdA running over Dan Biggar? How does it differentiate between a normal tackle and a tackle where the receiver feels like he's been run over by a freight train?
When Damian notches a break on ESPN, plastics have a vision of him bursting through the line or running over players. The anatomy of a Dud1 run is to go at the weak shoulder, which is usually the outside shoulder. Most defenders lean sideways and take him high. This is a very, very weak body position. One can't exert upper body strength, you can't drive from the legs, so you are dragged a little way if you don't slip off the tackle. Damian is always picked up by the next man, and it becomes a slow process of going to ground and trying to win the ball back - see his turnover in the third test. A Damian carry is nothing. His stats in context are nothing. I took the best statistical game of Damian's career - the home England test of 2018 and posted a video of every run, tackle and pass and one could plainly observe how ordinary he is.
Likewise tackle stats. Damian and Esterhuizen have been compared on the basis of ESPN stats, but a Damian tackle in no way equates to an Esterhuizen tackle. The one is a cuddle, the other is an extinction level event.
The rest of the ratings are ridiculous and ignorant. Willie had some moments, but was almost anonamous. Liam was the best 15 by far. Malherbe was a belly flopper well off the pace. Kolbe was nowhere most of the series. Kolisi no, Pollard no.
Rather flexible plastic than 'n klipkop...a lot of waffle...answer the question.
Metres gained per carry tells you that. As usual the facts are against you guys and you are arguing on the basis of subjective bs.
Henshaw was clearly the best inside centre in this series.
"What about his turnovers
The man is a beast"
Ignored...he plays on the deck like a flanker...hybrid.
Okay let’s accept beating defenders as the key:
Henshaw beats 6 defenders in 21 carries/ Allende beats 4 in 33 carries.
Pretty conclusive.
Not really. I mean take Am if beating tackles at 13 is easy. Am had a great series right? Now how many defenders did he beat in all 3 games? Nada….not one. Put that in your Rassie pipe and smoke it. Another glorious Erasmus stat.
Saffex, get a grip. You're arguing with a noob who had never heard of Robbie Henshaw until this series.
Moffie variously called him Henderson and Henson. Why are you wasting your time arguing rugby issues with a self-important old windbag who doesn't even know who Robbie Henshaw is . . . the same attention-seeking rugby beginner who told us years ago that Cheslin Kolbe would never make it in Test rugby . . . only to later proclaim himself the person on this board who discovered Kolbe?
Just have a laugh.
Noob….now here’s a noob
Hall Of Fame
11605 posts
Mar 24, 2021, 21:40Showpony Willie ahead of Aphelele Fassi?
Hahaha…..talk about dumb. But as the guy who preferred Watson over Schalk, Lambie over Pollard, Deysel twins over Juan Smith. And get this, thinks Etzebeth is useless….we should expect stupid stuff. And we are rarely disappointed.
Nice of you to try to rescue Dave, but perhaps you should take care of number one….hahaha!
No Am didn't, Damian was too busy holding the ball until Am was in front of him or throwing it behind his head, while Am in front of him. It's not only ugly, it doesn't work.
So the whole anti-De Allande mafia is at i t all the time - the main lot is rugby criminals spouting ignorance,
Reference one effective power run, reference one instance where he created space. The floor is yours.
f you watch gams and not spread disinformation you would have no need for "reference of one insurance" you refer to. Do no get the insurance side of the question either. English suffer again from the expert in shit spreading. .
I'm not asking for my benefit. I already have the details logged in depth. I know exactly what Damian did and didn't do. I'm asking you for some evidence to your claims. You, predictably, have nothing. You plastics are a dead end for debate. Your kind never have any material to bring to the table.
But back in the days when he was trying to emulate SBW he actually offloaded successfully. Obviously this is not something our Stone Age coaching is encouraging.
Stick to the topic, chump . . . and "stick to Moz"!
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Can't pass, can't kick, can't read play, can't tackle (one accurate big hit, but the carrier ran straight into him so it was hard to miss). Best in the series, best in the world, yet he can't do anything.
You care enough to wind your panties to the point of castration.
Big claims bellowed from a big mouth without a single shred of evidence.
Tribute videos are not evidence. Detailed analysis is. I have exposed a lot of those tribute clips, I have presented entire performances in its entirety. You were one of those who defended his 20m escort of an England player in 2018. You defended Lood missing the tackle on Isi in 2019, falling flat on his face (you were the only person who took that stance). You don't look for truth, only for whatever will support your preconceived ideas. You are thus dishonest.
And your disinformation icovers the other 80% - when one reads your description of what happened during and in games your assessment is totally flawed and what you "locked in" is a farce.
And your disinformation icovers the other 80% - when one reads your description of what happened during and in games your assessment is totally flawed and what you "locked in" is a farce.
Yes, I recall: "Video evidence is a gross fabrication of the truth"
You plastics are hilarious as you are desperate.
And no more of a farce than the lies and distortions by you.


