That last message is typical from the Americans Gang operating in the Cape Flats, You must have learned their culture at some stage or another,
Lets be explicit - Mozart is civil as long as you agree with him as the world rugby analyst, as proclaimed by himself. The moment you differ from him his barbaric traits come to the fore. He gets really vicious when anybody say anything favourable about his pet hate players,
A poor character who at best is a rugby illiterate.
That last message is typical from the Americans Gang operating in the Cape Flats, You must have learned their culture at some stage or another,
Lets be explicit - Mozart is civil as long as you agree with him as the world rugby analyst, as proclaimed by himself. The moment you differ from him his barbaric traits come to the fore. He gets really vicious when anybody say anything favourable about his pet hate players,
A poor character who at best is a rugby illiterate.
Does misrepresentation of facts and accordingly your twisted contributions become intelligent discussion? When somebody differ from you is that because he is unintelligent and not on your own created high level of acceptable contributions??
Most of your contributions are totally unrelated to rugby facts - it is about to what extent members can become prejudiced so they can become a partner in factual misrepresenting. In other words people agreeing with you are intelligent while those differing from you unintelligent and therefore real targets for personal attacks,
That must be another example of total arrogance coupled to a total lack of knowledge in respect of the game of rugby. But then the self-proclaimed world expert who falsifies match descriptions and hate some players is a serial liar as well.
No it was not - I made some mistakes and acknowledged that I did so - that does not represent lies. There is a huge difference between making mistakes and lying. If a member makes a mistake and admitted as such it can never be regarded as a lie, If the member does not admit that an erroneous statement was made by him - and he keep on repeating the erroneous statement on site - then it is definitely a lie created for malicious usage on site,
As for you - you write false match reports and launch unfounded personal attacks on players on a constant basis. When pointed out that you have got it wrong you persisted with the false reports and attacks, making such persistence very real lies.
There are also matters such as the selective usage of stats and not the full stats of players, as well as personal attacks on members you know nothing about - are very real issues as to fraud and lying. Another issue is the remarks made by you about you and some other members - normally supporting the false statements by you - being world class experts on rugby analysis and that you can identify problems top experts worldwide could not - represent a situation where arrogance is used freeing you to lie without restraint.
The above has resulted in you being a habitual liar - a situation that is unmatched on the site. Others have striven to do the same, but they are not constant in doing that and what really is reprehensible is that you constantly encourage them to act according to your own basis of dishonesty,
That is where you are a total liar as clearly illustrated above. I may make a lot of mistakes - you lied virtually all the time.
Not vague assertions - it was a summary of what you have done to this board. You need a lot of efforts to get to a stage that hate-speech and deceptions do not make up a high percentage of your contributions.
Until then we cannot accept that you are a true rugby supporter and factual; in what you write.
