FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  The ANC has gone ballistic and si no Appealing the Supreme Court Ruling on Al-Bashir

The ANC has gone ballistic and si no Appealing the Supreme Court Ruling on Al-Bashir

Started by clevermike5 REPLIES303 VIEWS· 08 Apr 2016, 17:29
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
08 Apr 2016, 17:29
#1
08 Apr 2016, 17:29#1
The following from News 24:-
"The government on Friday will apply for leave to appeal the judgment by the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) on Sudanese President Omar Al-Bashir.

"The government believes that the interpretation of legislation relating to immunity granted to a foreign sitting head of State needs pronouncement by the Constitutional Court as the apex court in the land and final arbiter on constitutional matters," Mthunzi Mhaga, spokesperson for the Ministry of Justice and Correctional Services, said in a statement.

He said that the government believed that legal uncertainties which had not been resolved by the SCA, both in terms of customary international law and domestic law, could only be properly pronounced on by the Constitutional Court.

"The Government therefore believes that there is a reasonable possibility that the Court will arrive at a different conclusion," Mhaga said.

In March, the Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed the State's appeal against a high court ruling that government's failure to arrest the Sudanese president was inconsistent with its constitutional duties.

When Bashir entered South Africa in June 2015 for an African Union summit, the SA Litigation Centre approached the high court for an order that government enforce an International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant on him.

The High Court in Pretoria ordered the government to arrest Bashir, and said its failure to do so would be unconstitutional. Despite this, he was allowed to leave the country."

After the ruling last week - the ANC is trying their luck in this case.  Another ruling that Zuma played tack with the constitution will send them into another tailspin.  They should have just accepted the Appeals Court judgement and forget about it.  The storm may have blown over - bar for a charge of ignoring a High Court judgment being laid against Zuma and the Minister of Foreign Affairs.

With Zuma's hold on the Police - nothing would have come from such a charge,

    


DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
08 Apr 2016, 18:06
#2
08 Apr 2016, 18:06#2
 Foocking idiots, even I know that no-one can ignore a court order without having it overturned prior to not complying. They are stalling,  that's clear, but why on Earth for? They are only going to embarrass themselves more. 
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
08 Apr 2016, 21:27
#3
08 Apr 2016, 21:27#3
 Ou maaaikie were you not the dope MOANING ABOUT POLITICAL POSTS ON THE RUGBY FORUM.BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA OU MAAAIKIE MAKES A TWIT OF HIMSEL F AGAIN.
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
09 Apr 2016, 14:18
#4
09 Apr 2016, 14:18#4
Ja Ok Beeno. Your team looked good last night man. Man of the match went to right guy. Future Bok.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
09 Apr 2016, 15:56
#5
09 Apr 2016, 15:56#5
 I apologize - don't know how this one got on the rugby component of the forum - since I always try and avoid posting non-rugby issues here.
 
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
10 Apr 2016, 05:02
#6
10 Apr 2016, 05:02#6
  "I apologize - don't know how this one got on the rugby component of the forum - since I always try and avoid posting non-rugby issues here."
Noted with respect, Mike. And BTW I agre e with your comments.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news