CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
23 Sept 2015, 17:16#1
Low life is constantly entertaining us with his constant threads on the age of sportsmen - but ignore when the opposite happens.
So lets give him another problem to chew on and come up with an explanation. Against Japan -
* The Springboks started with 10 over 30 players and they lost the game;* The Scots started with 11 new players in their side and they demolished the Japanese.
So where was the problem insofar as the Springboks are concerned? Was it because the has-beens and never-has-beens did not live up to their reputations?
Meyer will regret one thing in the rest of his life and that is him suffering from age affliction - just like Low Life is.
The Scots are going to beat us hollow in the pool fame we have to play against them and the Boks will be on the way back to SA sooner than you think - Low Life.
DEDezertFox
Pro2,288 posts
23 Sept 2015, 17:25#2
The players you vilified cost us the test, so best not bring up a subject that exposes you. Furthermore, Scotland do not have Japan' s backline. It's a completely different kind of test. Nor where they drilled for two months by a coach who had worked with the Boks.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
23 Sept 2015, 17:54#4
Desert Disaster
Unlike you and Low Life I do not vilify players and expose my ignorance on rugby issues like the two of you specialize in.
I criticize non-performance factually - that is not vilifying it is evaluation of performances. You and Low Life do the exact opposite - you criticize people because they compete with your favourites for Springbok selection. I deal with f act - you and the arch idiot Low Life deal with fiction you create in your bird brain minds
GEgeneraltit
Pro3,164 posts
23 Sept 2015, 18:29#5
Ol ' Maaik leave Moz alone...he might repent of his folly once he tastes Cloudy's home made crow pie...I hope she doesn't remember Beeno's mother Suzie???