The Goodhue try
I have watched this a few times, and I can't find anyone at fault.
What is surprising is that Sonny Bill is at 1st receiver and not Moounga- , with Barrat cutting the backline, or closer to the wing.
Sonny Bill does a skip pass (of Goodhue). Then Barrat made the break and passed inside to Goodhue. Delande could have done better on cover defence. He appeared to be on a Sunday stroll
The only way that could have been defended is if Am leaves SBW to Damian and Mapimpi fans out between Goodhue and Barrett. It would still be quite a stretch and a number of permutations could still result in a try. This is the danger of turnover ball.
So De Allende alone is to blame for the Goodhue try and he got Vermeulen's knock on "out of the way". That was not the only ball possession loss by Vermeulen on the day and he gave away two penalties as well. Never happened before/
Idiots galore - only a sick mind can come up with that description. Why did De Allende not learn to fly and then catch player that was at least 10 meters ahead of him to start with. This is the way the idiots mind works - what a lot of sheer BS AGAIN.
With that type of ball possession loss - Vermeulen has had the same problems in the past - the whole backline defense is thrown out of gear and even Matfield said so last night on TV and he should know since he was a center playing as a stand-in lock during line-outs/ Both he and Paulse claimed that De All ende did hos work as expected and never said a word about his involvement in the Goodhue try.
Why did De Allende not learn to fly and then catch player that was at least 10 meters ahead of him to start with.
This is why you can't be taken seriously on this forum, Mike. To start with, DA is ahead of both carrier Barrett and try scorer Goodhue. Not "at least 10 meters" behind.
This was always going to be difficult to defend. I still think Mapimpi had the pace to stay with Goodhue, but he was slacking along right until Goodhue received the pass, when he started mounting a chase. Our cover was caught fast asleep as Goodhue outstrips them in a sudden burst of speed between the halfway and the 10m line, taking about 3m from DA (from just behind him to roughly 2m ahead) in 10m.
Listen idiot - when Barrett ran through the gap he was at full speed already and by the time De Allende turned around and started running after him he was already 10 meters ahead of De Allende.
Both Goodhue and Barrett have pace aplenty - but then the whole story is totally concocted to try and blame De Allende for the try being scored. Another load of total BS on site. LMAO
by the time De Allende turned around and started running after him he was already 10 meters ahead of De Allende
In the shot above, De Allende had turned around and started running after him. He is still ahead of him.
I am not expecting them to catch Barrett, that would be silly. I am expecting them to be aware of Goodhue and stay close enough to him to make a tackle possible as he receives the scoring pass. In my opinion, that was possible, especially for Mapimpi who has more pace than Damian.
You think they couldn't, fine, that's your opinion.
Trying to sell the idea that DA was at any stage 10m behind Barrett though? A flat out lie and completely unnecessary given the touch and go nature of this incident. I don't know what you wish to achieve with these fabrications other than making a complete joke out of yourself.
Bullshit galore Mozart
You know nobody else but you could come up with this BS and nobody else but the other Idiot Speakers on site will agree with you on this issue because it is farfetched and based on theory that has no basis at all.
You are always the liar on site and your theories have been proved to be impossible to execute by any player. That makes you a complete IDIOT to even raise it on site.
Accept that Vermeulen buggered up badly - the defensive line as per what Matfield said was in disorder as a result of the bugger-up turnover and it would have been impossible to stop the try the way it occurred. To blame any one player other than Vemeulen for the try is complete and malicious idiocy and a futile attempt to excuse Vermeulen for causing the resulting try. Nothing new on that - I know of three other cases where the same BS was spread by you on site.
.
Duplcation
CHRIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As much as i am not a de Allende fan...
Moz, this is the biggest load of shit and a real example of an old person being stubborn in their ways!
Much like CM and Frans.
Prejudiced analysis is worthless - Chippo got it 100% correct. By the way IF my auntie had balls - she would have been my uncle.
No CM.... she would have been your father.
LOL Chippo
wat gaan no aan?
motsart you lick to speak buffelkak
allende wos not by any of the close player.
No, it's a drunken and prejudiced old fool who never played a minute of rugby in his life but spends all his time hanging out on this forum trying to pretend he's an expert.
Mozart
What would your response have been if Du Toit made that mistake? "THAT HAPPENS"?
No - it would have been 10 or more paragraphs of verbal abuse.
So why should any same person accept the BS you write ab ove..
https://m.facebook.com/RugbyFilms13/?refsrc=https%3A%2F%2Fm.facebook.com%2FRugbyFilms13%2Fposts%2F%3Fref%3Dcontent_filter&ref=content_filter&_rdr
HD quality copy;
https://verystream.com/stream/BbrB2Vk6tNb/2019_The_Rugby_Championship_R2_New_Zealand_vs_South_Africa_27.07.19.mkv
Mozart
The moment you manage to do analytical assessment on an objective basis it would be of great help to all of us. The moment you come up with BS like you did in this case it is a tragic joke that shows nobody can ever expect from you to post the truth on site.
Duplication
Liar
Goodhue did not run past De Allende - Barrett made the break nd ultimately passed to Goodhue when the latter was in the clear. Same BS as always.
Not carrying the ball B Ster. Lies wont-help you - but lies remains normal with you.
So why should De Allemnde deal with Goodhue and get carded and not Barrett as the ball carrier.
WE now have three successive threads started by you to demonize and belittle De Allende and on one case also Kriel - have you really got no other comment.
Yo u are back to the Goosen saga -3 new threads per week and the same with Du Toit. Have you really got nothing else on your brain about rugby but to write BS about those three players?
Funny - Funny. I quoted what you wrote and then took the stats and there as the lie for all to see. Convinced you are an habitual liar if you do not get your mean way about things . Happy Idiots Day to you..
Delande was on a Sunday stroll.
Another option might have been to get in-between Barrat and Goodhue, and do a "lazy run". (ala Mccaw). A lazy runner move would have at least made it harder for Goodhue to line up perfectly on his outside.


