The Goodhue try

.

Liar -liar - your pants are on fire,   The photo Idiot Speaker Pakie posted showed that De Allende was at least ten meters to the inside away from Barrett who was on full speed going forward.  If that was an well-positioned according to you.  Total Idiot Speak BS again, BSter.  You dimwit first claimed that De Allende was going to try and stop Barrett - but  should have followed Goodhue.  

You are known to make idiotic claims  about rugby  but this is by some distance the most idiotic ever -  no I am wrong here the physical impossibility to cut of Nonu from running diagonally across the field - confirmed by experts as a total impossibility -  is in line with this one and it is absolutely clear that you are a nut case when it comes to rugby;

What brought this on?   We know that you are crazy enough to bring  back threads where you were already severely embarrassed before,   I guess that you brought it back because I pointed out that Fat Fransie Steyn was an embarrassment and buggered  up badly on Friday and you want to get away from that discussion.   Piss poor effort I must add.     .                   

Dupli cate 

"You are known to make idiotic claims about rugby"

Speak for yourself Lügnerin. 

N o I am not an Idiot Speaker like you and Mozart.  

N o I am not an Idiot Speaker like you and Mozart.  

No I am not an Idiot Speaker and lia r  like you and Mozart.  

Third time's the charm. 

Mozart'

You have always been the biggest idiot on site  and the idiot who created scenarios on site which only an  absolute fool like you could believe possible.   

Your player support has always been that of a total rugby illiterate,   There has been so many foolish prejudices that it really is unbelievable.   Your interpretation is totally unbelievable,    If I were you I would think before writing total BS on site.   The other day when writing total BS to cover the inadequacy of Louw in defending when Sanchez ran past him you made the classical comments that Louw would have to develop wings to fly to tackle Sanchez,   Not even remotely true in that case - in the case of the Goodhue try De Allende would have to develop wings for the defense in this case,

Have you ever provided a true and realistic interpretation of what happened during rugby games?  If you have I have not seen it,  Your total bias can only be equal to the idiotic attitude of Comey and Strzok  in a political sense.   That shows total idiocy s well.   I will in future not call you an Idiot Speaker -  I have found your ideal description for you - Strzok you are and Strzok you will be in future.   A totally biased liar.

Now Strzok - lets get back to the real life,  Can you remember all the BS you wrote about Labuschagne over the years.   You were told he is a class loosie by every commentator and on site.   Before you ever saw him playing in a single game you condemned him as a player and made false claims about his weight and size.   You were repeatedly warned that you were a total idiot and so was your hero Meyer in his selections - remember.   Well on Friday the same Labuschagne gave the SA Loosies a real lesson as what loose forward play is about,  He was miles better than Vermeulen and Kolisi and even slightly better than Du Toit playing in a losing team.  You have in his case developed idiocy into a fine art.

Strzok and AO - in future to be called Liza Page - are total rugby biased idiots and we can be sure you will come up with BS in future - like trying to hide Fat Fransie's  total BS performance on Friday.   And then the hiding of the BS performances by players selected by Meyer for the 2015 test really was real disinformation.   The false story of yours in respect of blaming only Kriel for that defeat is a classical Strzok myth.          

   .     

.                            

Stop talking BS Strzok - look at the photo and don't  try misleading everybody again.   De Allende could not tackle Goodhue without the ball  and  De Allende turned and was following the line to try and go for Barrett.   You are really taking absolute crap in this case too.   Madness in evidence and it would serve no real purpose for De Allende to deal with Goodhue  without the ball.   Anyway who caused the problem in the first instance - Angel Vermeulen not so?

Also a coward not dealing with the issues raised by me.           

What question Strzok?  Your total BS about De Allende?