FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  The implications of rugby only posts....

The implications of rugby only posts....

Started by Mozart44 REPLIES856 VIEWS· 14 Jan 2017, 19:32
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
16 Jan 2017, 17:08
#41
16 Jan 2017, 17:08#41
 I'll interpret that as a 3 Mo, thanks.
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
16 Jan 2017, 18:09
#42
16 Jan 2017, 18:09#42
 There are 70 topic slots in the top section. If it's really a bad topic it will drift to the bottom eventually, but a few off topic threads won't push current rugby topics out of view. It seems that this debate is used to squash certain views. Where's the tolerance ?
XA
XaviPro1,924 posts
16 Jan 2017, 18:25
#43
16 Jan 2017, 18:25#43
What Blikkies said. 3 For myself.
AJ
Arthur JohnPro1,748 posts
16 Jan 2017, 18:26
#44
16 Jan 2017, 18:26#44
 3 for me.
Mozzie I will apologize for the remarks made by a fellow blogger to your late family member.
Disgusted and ashamed to see us go so low........
But thank you to all who served.
Forever grateful and respectful.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
16 Jan 2017, 18:37
#45
16 Jan 2017, 18:37#45
Thanks for that Arthur....I count myself lucky that my generation had "service light". The honour accorded to WW1 and WW2 vets cant be overdone.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news