SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
26 Feb 2015, 09:48#2
Jordaan is not the answer at 13 he is too small. Tyler Fisher is the real deal
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Feb 2015, 09:53#3
Balls - Fisher has shown zero compared to Jordaan insofar as actual performances are concerned. However, Fisher should be in the team ahead of Murray.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Feb 2015, 12:09#5
Dave
Sorry - but you are really talking tripe here. Jordaan in the past two years did twice what JJ Engelbrecht did - and that is a fact. Because in two years he missed two tackles, you - just like Mozart - make it out that his defense is deficient.
Both Engelbrecht and Jordaan had problems over the past two years. Engelbrecht because he should play on the wing and not at center - where he is more suited and where he will be less effected by the Bulls style of backline play. Jordaan because last year he had to play outside the piss-poor ball hogging Francois Steyn.
Let me be explicit. Size in rugby is important - but if it is not part and parcel of ball sense and reading of the game, it is of zero importance.
JEJeromeV
Club Pro492 posts
26 Feb 2015, 12:15#6
Tyler Fisher is without a doubt the best outside centre at their disposal, he's better than Jordaan and Murray in most aspects of the game. It's a pity to also see Jack Wilson's talent being wasted, He's a better option than Ndungane. I don't know much about Paul Perez although I've heard that he is a brilliant sevens player who joined the Sharks, he could possibly be a better option on the wing as well.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Feb 2015, 12:30#7
Jerome
I have not seen enough if Fisher to reach any conclusions on his performances. He played on Vodacom Cup level last year and those games were not televised. He did not make the CC team after Jordaan's injury last year so his exposure was severely limited making it very hard to say how he would perform on higher level.
I have my doubts about whether he is better than Jordaan - but insofar as Murray is concerned he no doubt is a better player - a player must be very weak not to be better than Murray .
Where I do agree with you is about Ndungane. He is getting past it and it is a pity that the Sharks selected him ahead of Wilson or Perez. Maybe the Sharks want to bring in Wilson gradually - hence his selection on the bench.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Feb 2015, 13:03#9
Dave
Easy to counter that argument about Engelbrecht vs Jordaan. For one thing Jordaan scored more than twice more tries on both Super 15 level and CC level than Engelbrecht did. He made more line breaks on Super 15 level in 1 year than Engelbrecht did in 3 years and that while he played outside of Francois Steyn - whose reputation since 2012 is that he is a killer of backline play. Engelbrecht's defense last year showed substantial improvement - but in 2012 and 2013 it was not up to the standard of Jordaan's defense in in the two years mentioned.
All-round there can be no argument that Jordaan was more effective at 13 than Engelbrecht was on both Super 15 and CC levels.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
26 Feb 2015, 13:32#10
Stop lying and provide the stats backing up that complete load of bullshit...Jordaan has done nothing of note at any level
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Feb 2015, 13:48#11
Dave
Just one stat is necessary - since 2012 Engelbrecht scored a total of 3 tries on Super 15 level - Jordaan scored in less matches played 7 tries. Comprehende?
The rest of the data needs some research and I do not have the time to do that now. If you do insist I will do it later on.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Feb 2015, 14:23#13
One piece of evidence - try-scoring - not enough? I will spend some time over the next week to deal with this issue.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
26 Feb 2015, 14:27#14
Nope try scoring means stuff all
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Feb 2015, 14:40#15
Come now Dave
Neither does line breaks - try assists - missed tackle ratio's, etc?
Over a period of three years stats indicate performance tendencies of players - so I will spend some time to rake all the above up to see how JJ justifies your high rating of him.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Feb 2015, 15:29#17
Pigheadedness makes you the same as some other members and does not work out. If there are skilful tries scored Jordaan beats JJ by more than twice.
Look the problem with JJ is that he has a game-reading deficiency and lack of ball sense - that makes him too robotic to ever be a top center. It does not count as much on the wing - so I still think he should play on the wing and not at center.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Feb 2015, 16:52#19
Dave
Let me quote from what you said and see how it applies in practice:-
"Mike you don't even bloody know what game reading is, let alone ball sense......Jordaan has good pace and a good step on him.....it ends there."
I do according to you not know what game reading and ball sense is - unfortunately JJ knows less than I do about it - and that was proven through his deficient performances as a 13 over three years of playing.
Jordaan has a good pace and good step on him - Engelbrecht has good pace, but no step on him.
Problem is that Engelbrecht has never adjusted his game - he was a wing and still plays like a wing, Unfortunately the Bulls is not a good training ground for development of center play and he could perhaps made the adjustment if he went to another franchise with proper skill-enhancing capacity than the Bulls would ever have. Engelbrecht is harming his own playing career by playing at center for the Bulls.
Engelbrecht played in two tests against the All Blacks - so which one are you referring to? The Ellis Park test his performance was seriously questionable.
26 Feb 2015, 17:07#20
He's playing outside center because Frans Ludeke is the coach at the Bulls...
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Feb 2015, 17:35#21
Shezza
That says it all - hahaha
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Feb 2015, 19:23#25
Dave
De Allende made a high tackle leading to a penalty - for Mozart that was a deadly sin. His idea about centers are seriously flawed - his ideal center pairing is De Villiers and De Jongh.
Mozart is a miracle insofar as assessment of performances are concerned. Lets take the case of Jordaan. In the semi-final last year Jordaan messed up in defense when he missed a tackle on Reid - so according to Mozart he lost the SR last year. It is of course utter balls. The Sharks lost by 38-6 - so the try where Jordaan failed to tackle Reid made no difference to the outcome of the game - if that did not happen the Sharks would have lost the game anyway since they really put up a poor show as a team.
Now lets take the case of Engelbrecht. Morne Steyn buggered up in defense constantly and that cost the Springboks one try when he missed a tackle on Ben Smith. Second try of Messam resulted from the most stupid decision of Steyn I have seen in fifty years - instead of a relieving kick, he passed the ball 10 meters out from the AB tryline and the ultimate result was the second Messam try. In the case where he blamed Engelbrecht, De Villiers went out of line in defense and got stepped, Steyn slapped Barrett on his back apparently wishing him well on his way to scoring the try and Engelbrecht missed the tackle. That resulted in Mozart assigning the blame solely to Engelbrecht - instead of assigning part of the blame to the other two players mentioned. Again the AB's won by more than 7 points - so the illogical Mozart is at it again.
Back to our argument on Engelbrecht. His main problem is that instead of aiming at the gap between defenders - he virtually always run straight at the first defender and gets tackled. In doing that he shows no stepping ability and an inability to create space for players outside of him. He has no off-loading abilities either and in virtually all cases backline moves end with him. Because of that Engelbrecht does not create space for players outside of him and he does not create space for himself. He is effectively the no 13 center with the fewest line breaks and least defenders beaten in any SA conference team. The few tries he did score was when he happened to be on the near the touchline and effectively did the work of wing - not a center.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Feb 2015, 23:59#27
Mozart
When tripe counts for something it may be worth reading your contributions - of real value it is not. A team losing 38-6 and you blame one player for the loss. That showed how skewed your ideas are.
Who last year competed for the worse tackle stats in center positions? It was Francois Steyn and Juan de Jongh - but not a word of that on this site. The rest of the centers were all way below them in the missed tackle ratio.
Who buggered up worse in the backline since 2012? Morne Steyn was the worse of those. He was so bad that Meyer was forced to drop him in 2012. Then came 2013 and he was back in with the failures in tests being ignored up to the very end, but in 2014 the signs were clear. He was poor in all the tests he played in and when he engineered the loss of the test in Perth - it was his final swansong in 2014. But not a word about Morne Steyn from Mozart.
So what must we expect - Mozart is most faithful in his support of players he likes and their flops are constantly ignored. The problem is he does not blame a player who caused a loss of a game by 1 point - but blames a single player when the team lost by 38-6.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
27 Feb 2015, 01:04#28
17 min - TRY CRUSADERS! Kieran Read beats his man on the overlap and doesn't need any help from the winger as he runs in the opening try behind the posts. That was beautiful, he was running with real pace and power. 10-0
There you have it the Sharks had just launched a beautiful attack from inside their 22. And then Read runs over the little chap you are punting....it totally changed the game.
And clean up your act, no need to be boorish.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
27 Feb 2015, 03:28#29
Mozart
Lets analyse the following statement:-
"There you have it the Sharks had just launched a beautiful attack from inside their 22. And then Read runs over the little chap you are punting....it totally changed the game."
There was no beautiful attack from inside their 22 started from ion side their 22 by the Sharks immediately prior to Read's try - so where did you get that from?
What about the other four tries scored by the Crusaders - all four also attributed to Jordaan? The Sharks never scored a try that game - there were two attacking moves initiated by Reinach and Lambie respectively - two other players you attacked also as being poor in that game - but both attacks did not result in any points scored by the Sharks. Their only points consisted of two Lambie penalties.
So because Jordaan failed in a tackle attempt on Read that led to a try - he solely became responsible for the defeat. What a joke.
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
27 Feb 2015, 07:30#31
Yes ou maaaikie Jordaan is a real talent and still only 23. He weighs in at 91 kg. Snapster needs to realise Fischer is 93 kg so his comments re size about these two players are a joke. (Per Offical sharks rugby website)Jordaan is a compact 180cm while Fischer is 189 cm.
If Jordaan can remain injury free it will be worth keeping an eye on him. He has real pace and skills and his defence is adequate.
JJ is 26 years old 95 kg and is a lanky 190cm. He is an easy target at center and lacks the ability to tackle hard or break a tackle. It is o bvious he would make a better wing. Bulle have done him no favours and have done much to mess up both JJ and Jan in different ways.
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
27 Feb 2015, 07:33#32
snapster the reason JJ plays center is that ou Ludeke is also clueless as cheaser implies. Wake up for once. JJ is not cutting it at center that much is clear. He did look good on the wing when playing in the Cape - FACT.
I will be happy to change my mind re JJ but only on perf ormance