AO
You lied on site and when challenged you claimed I do not have the comprehension to identify the lies. Lets rather admit that I can identify BS when I see it written on site.
Every time you are asked to provide proof about the statements you make you vanish from the thread or run for cover. Grow up sheister.
I never vanish, I crush you like a weak little mosquito, each and every time. You claim that Louw made only 2 turnovers against France. He made 3. You claimed he made only 3 the entire season. That was debunked. You are always proven wrong. Your only defence has been to give yourself a pat on the back. It reminds me of a scene from Hook.
Excellent of the bench. Ha-ha. The fact is he made two turnovers in possession - but made no ball carries and in three bench appearance - in total about 50 minutes - he made 3 tackles. By the way the actual turnover that won the French test was made by De Allende, which led to the Pollard try. Both you and AO ran off when I referred to that turnover and try.
That does not represent excellence. Did he not knock on a ball in the red zone - handing possession back to the AB's? No Mozart = nothing was proven in that game either. He made 10 tackles in that game - the despised Du Toit made 24 and the heroic Mostert the same. So the hero Louw was excellent?
And to say he is a professional - therefor he must be praised. Professionalism means you must do a job well and Louw did NOT.
OK and what about the Sanchez try and my reference to the similarity of Du Toit's poor defense a few years back and Louw's flop in that case.. When I pointed out the similarity - your response was a joke. You claimed there was no similarity, making an utter fool of yourself. No proof provided - but there was absolute similarity. Ha-ha-ha.
When will you ever be honest in performance evaluation?
No Mozart - try as you want to the player is over-the-hill and useless.
