Time for Peeper to ‘return’….

Our resident Grammar Nazi is having a doosy of a day, sjampies........ ain't that PHD a fat help.

P eeper-hole is so excited that a whole thread is dedicated to his participation on this board...geluk Rooidrol!

Squeaky Toy, truth be told, you seem a lot more excited than anyone else (including me) that there's a thread about me and my participation on this board. You've made 14 out of the 82 posts on this thread. Have a little think about that.

Be so kind as to clarify your position Peeper….are you still claiming Etzebeth is a racist  thug?

Oh you counted, how cute!

"Be so kind as to clarify your position Peeper….are you still claiming Etzebeth is a racist  thug?"

Huh?

Are you off your meds Moffie? Did you have an accident with your zimmer frame? Did you bang your head?

How much more clarity do you need? The second post on this thread is pretty clear . . . even for a doddering old fool. Even a stupid person can work out what Rosycheeks is saying and the words "criminal racist" are there for all to see.

So what needs clarification, Moffie? Unless of course you're admitting that you have copious amounts of egg dribbling down your fat face and were wrong about me being Searle/Rosycheeks?

Hmmmm?

Be so kind as to clarify your position, Moffie . . . are you still claiming I'm posting as Searle/Rosycheeks?

LMAO!

Florian hoist by his own petard!

Hall Of Fame

9556 posts

I've yet to know anyone more spiteful and hateful of another than ou Koosie. We need to be thankful to social media for exposing these types

What needs clarification Peeper is whether, accepting Etzebeth as a worthy Sharks player, you have given up on your view that he was guilty in the assault incident. Here’s an example of the tripe you were posting:

Hall Of Fame

12147 posts

Contrary to what some of the stinking liars on this forum will tell you, I'm no fan of BEE, Affirmative Action, quotas or whatever you want to call it . . . it's just apartheid in reverse as far as I'm concerned . . . but the real question to be asked here is just how stupid you have to be to get involved in something like this and to be assaulting people and calling them "hotnots" when you're a professional sportsman and it's just weeks before the showpiece event of your sport?

It's very obvious what has occurred in this situation: Rooinek has been working to orchestrate a comeback, and has successfully utilised Mrs Searle to make an opening founded on victimization whilst setting up his old foe to be the unreasonable aggressor. Well done Rooinek. They all played their parts well. 

So much human energy wasted on petty unbased quarrels.

Only a fraction would suffice to terminate rugby in SA.

Such a misallocation of resources.

Hey Rooitwit could we be clear once  and for all that you fully supported quotas. When I argued for merit selection you said I was a Nazi!

Then one day you told us all your son had not got a job because of affirmative action. You had a real meltdown, warranted in my opinion. However I had to point out the hypocrisy of your position, and you were left rooi faced again!

Bwahahahahahaha. It was an hilarious event.

Your extreme prejudice against Etzebeth and your hopes of him being prosecuted for racism are well know. Now he is playing for the wee guppies everything changes.

You have accept you are only consistent in being inconsistent. Hahahahaha.

Anyhow nice to see you around and hopefully you are going to cease playing Mrs Searle. As for your not using bad language sorry you have been one of the most vulgar cretins ever to post on a rugby website.

 Jy weet dan Beenz...the D!CK is guilty as sin.

Yeah 

Piss Mint openly discussed his preference of selecting a black player over a white player.....just to appease the politicians....

Fucking weak....

.

Piss Mint openly discussed his preference of selecting a black player over a white player.....just to appease the politicians....

Fucking weak....

Weak how. Selection has always been a political matter in SA rugby. That is the history of SA rugby.

Selecting from what pool of players. SA rugby has failed to bring the sport to the locals. The number of professional quota players is appalling.

As to the claim about discrimination, it is as baseless as claiming that returning property that was robbed is theft as the thief disagrees and considers that to be robbery.

SA rugby has put rugby in a very delicate position. It would take a lot of courage, accountability and other human values to return the situation.

All human virtues that are far from being displayed. SAns do not have it in them.

That is a policy of ruin. Ruining things and then picture the restoration or the correction as ruining things.

The honest solution would be to terminate SA rugby.

But since it is such a fetish for people, they can not let go and they keep bringing ruin everywhere as they have done already.

"Weak how. Selection has always been a political matter in SA rugby. That is the history of SA rugby"

Very simple... it is weak to say it, and then later deny you ever said it....

Either stick to your principles, or shut up..... Piss Mint cannot d o that

What principles.

SA rugby has made the selection a political matter way before the tale of the non existing quota policy.

It is another trend: any correction to an issue must be of a different nature.

The solution to a problem coming from politics is political by nature.

As stated many times already, the disgrace in SA rugby is not the non existing quota policy, it is the extremely low number of SA quota professional players.

This situation is the result of a political situation. Anyone selling the idea that it could be ended without involving politics has no argument.

Oppression can not be ended. For ending it would feel like oppression to the oppressors. Oppressors must be oppressed to end their oppression so it can not be done.

People must stick to theirs principles: anyone against oppression must work to end oppression, that would be oppression in itself.

People have nothing in store.

Whoosh!!!