Unbelievable Garbage written on this site

There was a number of issues raised on this site where unbelievable garbage by some members is a fact and that makes it so obvious that they are not even remotely knowledgeable about rugby at all and guided by total misrepresentations or just being silly or severely prejudiced.  
Lets look at a few case here:-
The selection of a coach
In this case most members indicated that they are against the appointment of Coetzee - while the one exception was Mozart - who supported the appointment with a vague recommendation that he must be backed up by assistant coaches.  So lets look at the opinion survey on News 24 where the outcome after 13 123 people participated showed the following:-
Coetzee                =   3874 votes   -   20,42%Erasmus                =   7249 votes   -   38,21%Another candidate   =   7846 votes  -   41,37%
Mozart obviously is entitled to his opinion - but he is so misguided about the issue of rugby so lets look at that aspect.  He supports Coetzee - because his thinking on rugby is equal to that of Coetzee and the departed not to be missed Meyer.    He believes that 90% of the role of flyhalfs is to kick balls and that stampkar rugby is what must be used as a norm.   He condemns backline passing of the ball and that the role of the center is to crashball.  Hence his support for players like Francois Steyn who has no penetration at all and crashball consistently.  The rest of the backline is there to defend only.
He also stated that the Lions should not have passed the ball on Saturday - since their backline is toothless - omitting from his reasoning that the front line centers of the Lions (Vorster and Mapoe)  on Saturday was not playing and that one cannot change a playing style just because of that.  On Saturday there was another game where the Storrmers mostly tried to use stampkar rugby and came short against the Sharks precisely because of the kicking game and stampkar rugby.
The playing style which Mozart fancies are in the end always losing rugby - FACT.
The Issue of inward scrumming
There are fools on site who believes that inward scrumming is not an offence and when one says it happened in a game - especially one member says it is not a factor since other players he mentioned is guilty of the same offence.   Really a laughable statement since the illegality is not to be taken as a factor, because of an alleged impression by him that players he consistently criticized in the past is according to him guilty of inward scrumming.
That kind of foolishness is why some contributions on the site is of such magnitude that it shows total disregard of fact and a display of prejudice.  
The issue of Line-outs 
Here it is a case of outright lies that is told on this site.  Mozart is the guilty party here.   The real issues here relates to the WC semi-final - where he blames only De Jager for the loss of line-outs while the facts are totally opposite to reality.
In that game he alleged that only De Jager lost balls in line-outs - yet the truth is hided by him.   The line-out losses were in fact as follows:-
*   Etzebeth - 1 line-out loss*   De Jager  - 1 line out loss*   Burger    -  3 line out losses*   Matfield  -  1 line out loss
De Jager called the line outs in 5 of the above cases and stopped calling line-outs to go to Burger - because the latter was incapable of jumping against Read and consequently never caught a line-out ball going to him.  The problem was aggravated by inaccurate throw-ins by the hookers - but that is never mentioned by Mozart - his attack was on De Jager - the only player who lost the balls on throw-ins.
Now lets get back to the Stormers-Cheetahs game where Etzebeth was outstanding - so Mozart had to get to De Jager again.  He claimed that De Jager moved to the front of the line-outs three times and all three line-outs was lost because Etzebeth outjumped De Jager - an outright lie.  It happened ONCE when in a shortened line-out it actually happened.   Then he refused to read an article where Etzebeth credited his performance on the calls made by Du Toit.  
Then came the Stormers  - Sharks game where they targeted the line-outs and made sure their line-out calls on own throw did not go anywhere near both the two locks - in the main to go to the Du Preez twins and line-outs did not become a factor in the game.  Burger was as in the game incapable to deal with the Du Preez twins similar to how he was uncapable to deal with Read.  The calls of Du Toit in this case went to either Etzebeth and himself who took all the line-outs going to them.   What was disturbing was that when the Sharks did call two balls to go to the front Etzebeth was outjumped by Oosthuizen who took all the balls thrown at him.  
OBJECTIVITY ON THIS SITE IS OVERTAKEN BY PREJUDICE AND IN THOSE CASES THE PREJUDICED DO NOT MIND USING DISINFORMATION AND UTTER GARBAGE TO JUSTIFY ATTACKS ON PL AYERS HE DOES NOT LIKE.                  

Using the post to illustrate the headline. Brilliant.  

 Yep this is total garbage from a discredited liar.

 The above is not total garbage of "a discredited liar".   It was a reflection of what you actually wrote on this site over the last four months - so if you want to call yourself a liar - you are welcome to do so. 
However, why not try and disprove what I wrote above as coming from you - that would be the way to prove that I am wrong.  A personal attack would not help here.