WD as I speculated, the Irish did the job for you

 Well as I said WD Ireland may do the job for you. The rush defence rendered yet another touch passer.....Ford....completely toothless. And the Poms were not there in the first half, did they think Ireland was a lay up? They looked much better with their subs in the second half, but couldn't crack the Irish defence. Ireland won with better lineout accuracy, better kicking and huge defence. Fairy rugby was not in evidence, this was the power game the Boks used to play.

 
Patting yourself on the back again, I see!

When aren't you doing that?

Soon as I'm wrong Carbuncle....don't hold your breath.

 
Sadly a great opportunity thrown away.

To go all that way only to fa lter at the line.

Tragic.

Not as tragic as winning 4 tests and losing 8. Although I agree this must be a bitter pill.

 
How did that "egg laying counter ruck" strategy work out for you, Faggot?

I believe you gave us all a lecture on Coetzee's brilliance at selected Alberts at 6.

You got that one right too, huh?

Haaaaaaaaahahahahahaaa!!

 About as well as Jantjies, Kleintjie Kriel, Mapoe, Faf Mostert and Whiteley ....worked out for you Desnotter. But still there is always Maakniks.....LMAOFY!

 Yes the poms found out that the winning streak is a mighty big ask to maintain.I reckon the Boks 17 run streak was better than the Poms purely because they had to play the ABs hahaha!Would rather our boys had put them to the sword but ah well thats not possible .

 you forgot, Vorster.

 That's because there's nothing big about "Big Guy" apart from his fat lip.

 Mozart
Are you ever right?  A week or so ago you wax lyrically about how the English play "traditional Springbok rugby" against the Scots.   So what happened now?  Were they playing real traditional Springbok Rugby in accordance with your concept of rugby yesteday?
How dare I question the almighty Mozart on this one.   Yesterday the English scored ZERO tries and kicked only three penalties.   That was typical Springbok Rugby in the last three years whenever Morne Steyn was the pivot.   You still have your regular praise songs about him and Fat Fransie so we can rest assured that we are going to be confronted by a steady stream of BS.  
But let us also remember how you think Farrell was the answer at flyhalf for the British Lions.   Let us also remember how you constantly attack SA players for missing tackles.  Your hero Farrell made 10 tackles and missed 6 tackles yesterday.   That is a missed tackle ratio of 37,5% - on par with the dismal record of he two Steyns - so one accept that it was acceptable to you.  Why your silence when Farrell failed in the statistical component and your hysterical attacks on SA players who missed tackles?
Then we have the George Smith saga yesterday.   Nobody doubt that he WAS in his prime a top loosie and everybody agree on that.   However, it was his claim that he still is that makes you a poofter.   He was totally inadequate yesterday as proven by his stats and you made no comments on him either,   If Du Toit was as bad as Smith was yesterday we would have had a thousand screams of agony on your part - so why the silence?   Incidentally he was comprehensively outplayed by Kriel yesterday - yet you have the audacity to keep on about how poor Kriel is.
Then there was the myth you told about the early replacement of Stander last week when he was replaced at minute 63.   But no word about the early replacement of Pollard at minute 53 on Friday.  
The above Is just a few examples of the BS you write on this site and then you think that we must take your rubbish as gospel.   Now you have a real case to respond by quoting some childish and useless song lyrics - so show us some rugby knowledge and respond in an adult manner.               
   

Rocky burst in, and grinning a grin . He said, "Danny boy, this is a showdown". . But Daniel was hot, he drew first and shot, . And Rocky collapsed in the corner.

 Another simpleton quote without dealing with the issues raised.   Moronic  comments at best.