FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Which would you rather have…

Which would you rather have…

Started by Mozart18 REPLIES901 VIEWS· 26 Nov 2022, 22:16
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
26 Nov 2022, 22:16
#1
26 Nov 2022, 22:16#1

Dud Allende, 5 runs for 5 metres….no clean breaks, no offloads, 2 defenders beaten while apparently standing still


Or…Willemse 9 runs for 64 metres, 2 clean breaks, 4 defenders beaten and 2 offloads.


If we we’re relying on Dud it would have been an arm wrestle. We broke the game open by finding space. I’d love to see:


Willie

Arendse

Am

Willemse

Kolbe

And Libbok


Perhaps we would need one power back like Esterhozen to distribute and gum up the channel, but those have to be some of the most lethal open field runners in the game.


DE
Deus Ex LemurPro2,355 posts
26 Nov 2022, 23:04
#2
26 Nov 2022, 23:04#2

Willemse is more effective in open space, as he has a step. However, this backline is being assembled on another false dawn. If we face a passive defence, a defence with inside leverage, or free space, then they can run. If not, they are doomed. It is a lightweight attack of limited utility that is not capable of operating in unison to create against a serious defensive effort. 

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
26 Nov 2022, 23:13
#3
26 Nov 2022, 23:13#3

I take your point, but do you beat a stacked physical defense by being a physical offense….or do you beat them with pace and elusiveness. Paulse, Kolbe, Am and now Arendse have left the big guys grasping air. The more vexing question is defense, their open field tackling is par or better, it’s the tight channel defense that is less clear.

DE
Deus Ex LemurPro2,355 posts
27 Nov 2022, 01:38
#4
27 Nov 2022, 01:38#4

The players you cited are window dressing atop something more substantial. Moving on from Damian is 9 years overdue, but we have the talent to do so much more. Test rugby is at a low ebb, and instead of dominating and building a future into the next ten years and beyond we are accepting pitiful rugby. I'm not seeing anything that I would consider to be great or sustainable. I know it's not all bad, and I get what you are saying, I'm just not happy with what I'm seeing. We need a real coach and an entire overhaul of Bok rugby. Erasmus is the Gareth Southgate of South African rugby. 

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
27 Nov 2022, 07:03
#5
27 Nov 2022, 07:03#5

L'Merde Grande and the shit on the brain Mozart iare all over in rugby again.   Mostert may have been mentioned by the Commentators on the service Mozart watched - he was no where to be seen 95% of the match and was useless as per normal.   He makes zero contribution at breakdowns where he is just pushed out of the way.   His tackling is weak and very questionable and his line-out performances are weak as well.

By the way a strong carry to virtually on the try-line by De Allende taking three players with him and ending a meter out from the tryline set up the try of Etzebeth.  As per normnal the shit-brained 2 never saw that.           

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
27 Nov 2022, 09:42
#6
27 Nov 2022, 09:42#6
Moz Moz Moz all of Willemse’s good work on attack was from broken play, not from structured back line play Perspective
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
27 Nov 2022, 10:35
#7
27 Nov 2022, 10:35#7
Yes, Saffex…and the Boks have the pack to create plenty of unstructured play and space. Right now, as evidenced by this tour, our forwards dominate the best European packs…and then DDA runs into the first person he can find.
DE
Deus Ex LemurPro2,355 posts
27 Nov 2022, 11:01
#8
27 Nov 2022, 11:01#8

The Bok pack looked blunt against France and were overpowered by Australia in the first test, average against Ireland, for the longest time blunt and cumbersome against Italy (Kwagga cracked the game open), heavily overpowered by New Zealand in both tests. England are a good match up for us, more so than any other 6 nations side. Eben needs a partner, Kwagga needs to start, Kolisi must go, the front needs a rethink. Some of our players look less fit than they did several years ago. When put under pressure our structures look laboured and start to disintegrate, we don't seem to be able to sustain our shape when on the front foot. Fitness needs to be corrected. We need more mobility and skills in the pack. Modern attacking rugby is a 15 man effort. That's how space is created, not by lumping bodies of players in dull sequences out wide. We haven't taken one step forward this season. 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
27 Nov 2022, 13:57
#9
27 Nov 2022, 13:57#9
DA gives as forward momentum from structured play Plum - you just don’t get it do you? Do you want a back line made up of 7 players with dancing feet? Good luck with that You really are clueless
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
27 Nov 2022, 22:20
#10
27 Nov 2022, 22:20#10

But Dud doesn’t.. ..yesterday in 5 runs he made 5 metres. Hardly ‘forward’.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
28 Nov 2022, 00:17
#11
28 Nov 2022, 00:17#11

In that 5 meters were included a move ended less than a meter out carrying 3 defenders with him.     It was that carry that led to the scoring of the Etzebeth try.    Of course you preferred not to see what really happened in that case - same as you normally do in all test matches.        

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
28 Nov 2022, 00:17
#12
28 Nov 2022, 00:17#12

In that 5 meters were included a move ended less than a meter out carrying 3 defenders with him.     It was that carry that led to the scoring of the Etzebeth try.    Of course you preferred not to see what really happened in that case - same as you normally do in all test matches.        

DE
Deus Ex LemurPro2,355 posts
28 Nov 2022, 00:25
#13
28 Nov 2022, 00:25#13

So you're saying that he fell forward a metre or less with three people touching him. Anyone can do that. You need to raise the bar Mr Clever. 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
28 Nov 2022, 00:41
#14
28 Nov 2022, 00:41#14
A metre gained in traffic is forward momentum - it’s the same stat Eben produces in traffic And DA is not defined by his last game - he has been good all season and that’s a fact Evidenced by his selection in the dream team - case well and truly closed
DE
Deus Ex LemurPro2,355 posts
28 Nov 2022, 00:55
#15
28 Nov 2022, 00:55#15

Is it? Slow, stodgy carries give the opposition valuable reset time. That's the hallmark of a Damian or Steph carry. 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
28 Nov 2022, 01:30
#16
28 Nov 2022, 01:30#16
Oh what utter bullshit Your rugby ignorance shines bright
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
28 Nov 2022, 04:22
#17
28 Nov 2022, 04:22#17

I’m afraid much as I’d like  to support Dud Allende….the tractoring hardly ever produces anything. It certainly didn’t yesterday. But the hype is entertaining. Take the bit that Kriel was great in defence when he was easily brushed off by Noll in a missed tackle reminiscent of his Japanese match losing flub.

I do, however, accept your point Dave that we have to have some bulk in the backline. I think if that had been Esterhozen he would by now have been making huge contributions.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
28 Nov 2022, 16:09
#18
28 Nov 2022, 16:09#18
Disagree Moz, while Esterhuizen is a monster he has not been as dominant physically as DA has. DA clearly has explosive power as he always makes metres in traffic Esterhuizen is the perfect back up to DA, if you are looking to replicate his style, while Willemse will offer the dancing feet and space attack
PA
PakieCaptain17,321 posts
28 Nov 2022, 16:26
#19
28 Nov 2022, 16:26#19

In that 5 meters were included a move ended less than a meter out carrying 3 defenders with him.  

No, he was tackled and brought down by Farrell alone. Watch again. Marcus Smith attempted to assist but was already moving backwards to do so. Etzebeth then joined to add a little extra momentum towards his own try.

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby