FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Why sane women dont appreciate

Why sane women dont appreciate

Started by Beeno11 REPLIES216 VIEWS· 16 Jan 2016, 21:54
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
16 Jan 2016, 21:54
#1
16 Jan 2016, 21:54#1
sharia law:

SHARIA LAW: Gender Inequality
Sharia explicitly relegates women to a status inferior to men.

• Testimony of a woman before a judge is worth half that of a man.
• Women are to receive just one half the inheritance of a male.
• Muslim men are given permission by Allah in the Koran to beat their wives.
• Muslim men are given permission by Allah to commit marital rape, as they please.
• Muslim men are permitted to marry up to four wives and to keep concubines in any number.
• Muslim women may marry only one Muslim man and are forbidden from marrying a non-Muslim.
• A woman may not travel outside the home without the permission of her male guardian and must be accompanied by a male family member if she does so.
• Under sharia, to bring a claim of rape, a Muslim woman must present four male Muslim witnesses in good standing. Islam thus places the burden of avoiding illicit sexual encounters entirely on the woman. In effect, under sharia, women who bring a claim of rape without being able to produce the requisite four male Muslim witnesses are admitting to having had illicit sex. If she or the man is married, this amounts to an admission of adultery.


Meanwhile this feminist knows the stroty:

Ex Breibart London:

After the New Years migrant sex attacks, a leading German feminist has said the politically correct “bubble has burst” and Germans should speak out against Islamism. She claimed Cologne police have been covering up Muslim rape for 20 years, and said that sexual violence was now being used as a weapon of war in Germany.

By in large, the feminist reaction to the migrant sex attacks has been to either play down the problem or deflect attention on to a non-existent “western rape culture”.

As Breitbart London reported shortly after the attacks, a local feminist group in Cologne held a protest in support of further mass migration, and a British feminist publication tried to justify abandoning female victims because the male Muslim attackers were “oppressed”.

Alice Schwarzer (pictured left, next to German Chancellor Angela Merkel), is a veteran “second wave” feminist who rose to prominence before feminism became preoccupied with apologising for Islamism and misogynistic Muslim culture.

She has previously called for a ban on the wearing of the Islamic headscarf in schools or other public settings, and warned of a creeping Islamisation of Europe, which in her opinion would lead to an erosion of human rights, especially women’s rights.

She told Die Welt in an interview yesterday that her Cologne based magazine Emma.dehas been one of the only voices speaking out for women in Germany over the past 25 years.

“Since then, I have in certain circles been cheerfully reviled as a racist by multicultural, Greens, Leftists and converts”, she said, explaining that she has faced “enormous intimidation” for speaking out.

“Entire books have been published against me to try to shut me up. But in my case, it has not succeeded.”

She also made a startling revelation, which appeared to suggest that Germany police have been covering up the scale of migrant and Muslim rape for more that two decades.

“20 years ago, a Cologne police officer said to me: ‘Alice, 70 to 80 percent of all rapes in Cologne go to the account of Turks.’ I was shocked and replied: ‘You absolutely must make it public! Even a Turk is not born as a rapist. There must be causes. What’s going on here? What can we do?’

“But the message was clear: ‘No way, that’s not politically opportune’. And it is this kind of political correctness that conceals the circumstances,” she said.

She also said that there are in fact many people in Germany who, like her, feel, “critical about the development of so many migrants and refugees in Germany and their failure to integrate”. She said such people “fear the racism accusation”, but after Cologne, “This bubble has now burst”.

She argued that the “grotesque” contradictions in modern feminist discourse, namely the tendency to excuse Muslim violence against women, was in fact a form of racism. She insisted that feminists should not “patronise” Muslims by apologising for their intolerance and crimes.

“Political correctness should not prevent us from free thinking,” she said, “Because it’s not about people, but about ideology.”

“You should tell [migrants]: ‘You have the same rights – but also the same obligations!’ After the events in Cologne I keep reading the so-called young feminists arguing that, ‘rape is German problem also.’

“That’s right, we feminist pioneers have been saying this for 40 years!” But, she said, the migrant rape phenomenon clearly is of “a new quality, a completely different dimension” to lesser sexual violence committed by native German men.

She also argued that, “the headscarf has nothing to do with faith. It is a political signal,” claiming that, “Islamists offer parents money when their daughters wear veils” and reaffirmed her call for the garment to be banned in public institutions.

She also argued that the mass rapes on New Year’s Eve were a form of “war strategy”. She said:

“In all the wars the systematic rape of women is part of the war strategy. Because sexual violence against women reaches two people. First: Man breaks the women. Secondly, to humiliate their husbands. That would be really a controversial political dimension: Kalashnikovs, explosives belt and now sexual violence”.

She also explained that, “We have long known that a strong surplus of boys, not yet men, between 18 and 30 can be very tricky. This can even be triggering of war.

“China has pulled the emergency brake at 117 to 100 women, and the one-child policy changed. Sweden has now, thanks to the refugees, 125 to 100. And in Germany it will be similar at 70 to 80 percent of young men among the refugees. This surplus of men is a threat, regardless of cultural background”, she said.

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
16 Jan 2016, 22:06
#2
16 Jan 2016, 22:06#2
 Dr Ben Carson speaks out against civilisation Jihad and CAIR:Ex Breibart

CHARLESTON, South Carolina – GOP presidential candidate Dr. Ben Carson tells Breitbart News that the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) – which has spoken out defending Muslims including the San Bernardino terrorist’s family – is a terrorist organization that is calling for a “civilization jihad” and will “destroy us from within.

“That organization has clear cut ties with the Muslim Brotherhood and some other terrorist organizations and that’s why I called for an investigation into it,” Carson told Breitbart News after the GOP debate in South Carolina on Thursday night. “They insinuate themselves into our society.”

They want to bring about what they call civilization jihad and destroy us from within. They recognize that we are vulnerable because we are so politically correct and won’t do anything about it. That’s why I’m trying to call attention to it. Not that I have anything against Muslims who want to be Americans who accept our values, and our culture and our laws, but anybody who doesn’t, as far as I’m concerned, they’re not welcome.

CAIR has been declared a terrorist organization by the United Arab Emirates and was named by federal prosecutors as an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas-funding operation.”

Carson also commented on the sexual attacks on women in Germany on New Years Eve by allegedly Middle Eastern men suspected to be migrants.

I think if we are smart we will look at that and we will learn from it,” Carson said. “ But that’s a big ‘if’ unfortunately and that’s why we got to get a new administration in there as soon as possible.”

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news