Worcester want compensation for Hougaard injury

ouch. Another nice argument down the drain because of facts.
Want some more of the same, comrade CleverZunk? Appendix 3 goes even further by also prescribing minimum levels:
2.2 The cover referred to in Section 2.1 above shall include Medical Expenses, loss of Emoluments, Temporary Total Disablement, CareerEnding Injury and Catastrophic Injury incurred as a result of injury sustained at the time when the Player is on International Duty.

3. Minimum Cover 
3.1 The minimum financial limits and the terms and conditions of the cover to be provided pursuant to Section 2 above will be agreed or specified by World Rugby from time to time but will not be less than:   (a) In the case of a Catastrophic Injury: £1 million sterling;   (b) Where a Player sustains a Career-Ending Injury and is aged on the date of the incident:       (i) 29 years of age or less; his Guaranteed Payments (save where such Guaranteed Payments are more than £225,000 sterling they shall be deemed to be £225,000 sterling);       (ii) between 30 and 32 years of age (inclusive); 66% of his Guaranteed Payments (save where such Guaranteed Payments are more than £225,000 sterling they shall be deemed to be £225,000 sterling);       (iii) 33 years of age and over; 33% of his Guaranteed Payments (save where such Guaranteed Payments are more than £225,000 sterling they shall be deemed to be £225,000 sterling);   (c) Where a Player is Temporarily Totally Disabled: his Guaranteed Payments (save where such Guaranteed Payments are more than £225,000 sterling they shall be deemed to be £225,000 sterling), on a pro-rata basis for the period of time during which he is unable to participate in the Game to a maximum of one year from the date of the injury, and ending 7 days prior to the date he is able to resume participating in the Game; 
 (d) The cost of any and all Medical Expenses.

By the looks of it, both Hougaard and his club are entitled to a few pounds.

 clevermike
 
Status: Hall Of Fame 
Posts: 24812RE: Worcester want compensation for Hougaard injury
December 13, 2016, 14:11:33

 The trooth Fairy
You are as stupid as they come and the fact that you act like an idiot is just normal with you,   Go and read the Laws of World Rugby and then come back and apologize - don't be a moron like your ass fly compatriot is.  

Looks like an apology is in the cards, indeed. Shall we have THAT gif again?
Noooo.....

OH why the hell not? Go on then.

.

.
.
.

 Apology for BS - and the story that Hougaard was not identified as being injured playing for the Springboks is farfetched and cannot be proved.  He played and was not selected after the AB test where he was disastrously poor - when was he injured?    
So the story about the injured player returning can be construed as BS.   There was no indication ever that Hougaard was injured while playing for the Springboks,   So what the hell is this all on about?   A story started by Worcester without any real proof - the man could have been injured elsewhere and then  Worcester claim it happened when he was playing for the Springboks.  
The whole story is BS and I stand by my original statement.        

 Hahahaha. You cannot make this sh!t up. Have a look at the chain of events.

1. Sharkbok opens the thread with an article about Worcester Warriors claiming compensation.
   




2. I say that I think that they have a point and give my opinion why I think that they have a point.
   




3. Ou comrade CleverZunk immediately jumps on the bandwagon, ignoring my opinion and the reasons for it and decides to rather attack me in person. He also decide to refer me to the "Word rugby Laws" without even thinking of displaying his own "superior knowledge" of said laws by quoting the exact "law" that has reference to this particular case.




4. JW also gives an opinion, stating that it appears to have been a case of the SA medical team not taking due care of their players.
   




5. Our Comrade apparently slowly starts to see the light, by the look of things, but he tries another escape route by throwing the "Johan Rupert-card". A card that should actually be used on another playing table (thread). He still fails to raise any opinion on the competency of the SARU medical team.
   




6. The Truth gives our comrade a "hidden" warning about his "audacity" remark but he doesn't recognise said warning. Instead of hanging back for a while and start having a look at the "Word rugby Laws", he soldiers on regardless. He attacks The Truth as well and also refer him to the "Word rugby Laws". By now, it has become blatantly obvious that he does not have the foggiest idea which laws, exactly, he himself is referring to but don't worry. He will keep on soldiering on.
   




7. And then......... the bubble bursts. The "Laws" explode in his face, in the forms of the Regulations as per the World Rugby Handbook. None of this would, however, be found in the in the non-existing "Word rugby Laws".
   




8. "So, where to next for our comrade", one would ask, but not to worry. He has another ace up his sleeve". Worcester Warriors have been bullsh!tting about this so-called injury of Hougaard, making the entire argument about the validity of their claim irrelevant. 
   

Hahahahahaha. FFS, you should try your hand at stand-up comedy, ou varkballas.
PS. I have to give it to you, though. Unlike your normal tactics of disappearing when you are down, this time around you keep on coming back for more. You seem to relish the cupboard door - broken nose combination.

 Mr Ceradyne what has Donna Nobles dear old Dad to do with Worcester trying to set a dangerous precedent for international sides ?NH clubs being the dogs arse trying to wag the wee dogs breakfast that is SARU at present.Jeezum crow I wish that SARU would get its house in order I canna even enjoy the replays of the ABs vs Boks this year as its like watching oversized kids being beaten up .What happened to that team from 2013-15 ? 

Wardad: "...Worcester trying to set a dangerous precedent for international sides ?"

What precedent. It cannot be a "precedent", as it is already specified in detail in World Rugby regulations. It's always been that way... When a player gets injured while on duty with a national side it is the National Union that is responsible for the medical expenses. And I'm talking from first hand experience here!

 Devil's Advocate

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1526 RE: Worcester want compensation for Hougaard injury
December 13, 2016, 08:57:47

Please

No more broken noses

Mike, just concede..... prevent the pain bro