CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
01 Dec 2014, 11:00#2
Biltongbek
Part of the stats quoted is not visible due to adverts.
But the stats reveal something else - and that is the WC year was s tatistically a huge improvement on 2006. Will the same happen next year?
Not so sure about that one. Meyr has the inherent ability not to see when againg players start deteriorating in performance and his "experienced" players is likely to be ou downfall. Talking about playing players into the ground - Meyer did it.
Have you forgotten - De Villiers was the coah in name only - the real bugger-up was made by the senior players - who ran th e show and self-destructed.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
01 Dec 2014, 11:21#4
BB
Are you sure you have the temrinologuy right? Is it not "ruining the show" ?

sharkbok
Captain23,293 posts

sharkbokCaptain23,293 posts
01 Dec 2014, 12:25#8
I saw Meyer trying to use this as an excuse. However this is not enough data to be statistical significant. (i.e, a trend or pattern).
Look at Pdivvy stats. He actually did worse in the 4th year than in the 3rd year.....Div never really hada good year other than 2009.
20081394069%3601951654220091284067%276249272120101486057%397344533920119540 56% 229133
Meyers stats are about the same in the 1st year as the 3rd year.
Jake White did badly in his 3rd year.
PAPakie
Captain17,321 posts
01 Dec 2014, 12:40#9
Steve Hansen, on the other hand, has had a pretty useful third year.