FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / CRICKET /  Young pop guns fire blanks...weaknesses exposed

Young pop guns fire blanks...weaknesses exposed

Started by Mozart68 REPLIES1,235 VIEWS· 07 Mar 2015, 18:24
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
10 Mar 2015, 14:43
#41
10 Mar 2015, 14:43#41
 And he did what exactly with the previous 16 balls?
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
10 Mar 2015, 17:02
#42
10 Mar 2015, 17:02#42

Played them on their merits or would you have him try create something from nothing. SA were in shit, he was there to rebuild the innings.

 

But you are too thick to comprehend this obvious fact.......so because a bat does not score off 16 balls, when run rate is not an issue and wickets in hand are.....you conclude he was batting poorly.......I knew you knew little about the game, but you do keep confirming it.

 

Keep up the good work.

 

Next time I defend/leave 16 balls without scoring I'll be sure to conclude I'm doing a bad job.......what a joke

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
10 Mar 2015, 17:26
#43
10 Mar 2015, 17:26#43
 Nah you have to admit that he just could not get going. Weren't you trying to convince me how easy it was hitting Duminy for 11 runs per over on a field the size of a rugby field?
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
10 Mar 2015, 18:25
#44
10 Mar 2015, 18:25#44
Was a spinner bowling to Miller you plank  
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
10 Mar 2015, 18:55
#45
10 Mar 2015, 18:55#45
 So what? Are you saying that he cannot play spin? Eish
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
10 Mar 2015, 19:47
#46
10 Mar 2015, 19:47#46
 Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11657 RE: Young pop guns fire blanks...weaknesses exposed
March 10, 2015, 18:25:56 Was a spinner bowling to Miller you plank 


  • 0 Likes


Bullsh!t Bertie at work.

This was Miller's spell with the bat, facing only two bowlers, i.e. Wahab Riaz and Rahat Ali (who got his wicket). Care to explain to us which one of those two is the spinner that was bowling to Miller? You might find that Riaz is a left-arm fast bowler and Ali is a left-arm fast-medium. Who is the plank now?

Slightly nervy times for SA fans at the ground as David Miller saunters ever so smoothly to the middle

12.3

Wahab Riaz to Miller, no run, tries him out with a full delivery on middle and leg which is defended back to the bowler

12.4

Wahab Riaz to Miller, no run, "ooooohhh" goes around the ground as he fires in a sharp bouncer which has Miller weaving out of its path

12.5

Wahab Riaz to Miller, no run, tries to steer away a run through point, but is unable to do so in the end

12.6

Wahab Riaz to Miller, no run, short outside of off as Millar initially looked to have a go before withholding at the last moment

Has been a wonderful fightback from Pakistan in these last few overs to turn this match into a contest

End of over 13 (wicket maiden) South Africa 74/4 (158 runs required from 34 overs, RR: 5.69, RRR: 4.64)

    • DA Miller 0 (4b)
    • AB de Villiers 1 (7b)
    • Wahab Riaz 2-2-0-2
    • Rahat Ali 3-1-17-1
13.1

Rahat Ali to de Villiers, no run, AB pokes at this one going across him to the keeper as he looked a touch hesitant in going for it

13.2

Rahat Ali to de Villiers, no run, keeping it nice and tight on that fourth/fifth stump line as AB fends away to the off side

13.3

Rahat Ali to de Villiers, no run, short of a length which gets good carry off the deck as it flew through to the keeper

13.4

Rahat Ali to de Villiers, no run, back of the length on the pads which is tucked away towards midwicket, but they can't pinch the run

13.5

Rahat Ali to de Villiers, 1 run, clips away this length delivery off the pads as they are able to scamper through for the run

13.6

Rahat Ali to Miller, no run, fuller one outside off which is defended away carefully to the off side

Aron: "From 67/2 to 74/4, I wasn't surprised at all, we can expect this kind of collapse in Modern Cricket, Good comeback by Pakistan.."

End of over 14 (1 run) South Africa 75/4 (157 runs required from 33 overs, RR: 5.35, RRR: 4.75)

    • DA Miller 0 (5b)
    • AB de Villiers 2 (12b)
    • Rahat Ali 4-1-18-1
    • Wahab Riaz 2-2-0-2
14.1

Wahab Riaz to de Villiers, 1 run, punches away this back of a length straight down the ground through long off

14.2

Wahab Riaz to Miller, no run, tries to steer this length delivery to the left of the bowler, who got down on all fours in an attempt to cut this one off

14.3

Wahab Riaz to Miller, no run, guides away this back of a length towards the off side

14.4

Wahab Riaz to Miller, no run, Riaz is on another level at the moment as he fires through a 138kph back of a length delivery which Miller looked to nurdle away through the leg side, but the ball ends up shaping away slightly on the way to the keeper

14.5

Wahab Riaz to Miller, no run, tries to work a single through the leg side, but is unable to find the space he required

14.6

Wahab Riaz to Miller, no run, fails to time away this slightly short and wide delivery through cover point, as the ball ends up nearby on the off side

Ibrahim: "Wahab Got us back in game. Well Done boy.. We Can do it "

End of over 15 (1 run) South Africa 76/4 (156 runs required from 32 overs, RR: 5.06, RRR: 4.87)

    • DA Miller 0 (10b)
    • AB de Villiers 3 (13b)
    • Wahab Riaz 3-2-1-2
    • Rahat Ali 4-1-18-1
15.1

Rahat Ali to de Villiers, no run, looking to guide this one through cover point, but picks out the point fielder instead

15.2

Rahat Ali to de Villiers, 1 run, moves over to the off stump before clipping away this full delivery on the stumps through fine leg

15.3

Rahat Ali to Miller, no run, tails in on a fuller length outside of off as Miller plays outside of the line in an attempt to get this through extra-cover

15.4

Rahat Ali to Miller, no run, turns away this length delivery onto the leg side, but finds the close-in fielder soon after

15.5

Rahat Ali to Miller, OUT, unleashes a wonderful yorker on middle which Miller appears to be late on. Looked out as soon as it struck really. Miller wants the review though. Replays show this went on to hit the back pad, so that may hurt his chances for this being given, but it is red all the way down, so Miller has to go, and South Africa are now five down with still quite a bit to do


If you look closely you will see that it looked like Miller had no answer to the bowling of these two.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
10 Mar 2015, 20:19
#47
10 Mar 2015, 20:19#47
That seems to cover all the angles...funny how much better the yorkers get if they are bowled to a pop gun.  
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
11 Mar 2015, 11:48
#48
11 Mar 2015, 11:48#48

Wow Vlagshit are you really this stupid? Your angle was...'Weren't you trying to convince me how easy it was hitting Duminy for 11 runs per over on a field the size of a rugby field?'

 

My counter was that Miller was NOT facing a spinner on a rugby field. Hello!!!!!

 

Firstly JP got smacked by a guy who had his eye in and was an opener when the pressure was not on and chose to attack him given firstly he is a spinner and secondly the field was tiny.

 

Miller on the otherhand had only just got in, his side was in shit and he was there to steady the ship before launching an attack......he never got to that point because he was undone by a great Yorker........one that according to Moz looked better as Miller is a opo gun.......what utter ignorant crap.

 

But hey ho you lot are a real tonic when it comes to cricket.......you lot have clearly played very little of this lovely game for your appreciation of the art is a big fat ZERO.

 

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
11 Mar 2015, 12:02
#49
11 Mar 2015, 12:02#49
I do not see a "not" in your original post.  
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
11 Mar 2015, 14:56
#50
11 Mar 2015, 14:56#50
What part of 'Was a spinner bowling to Miller you plank ' do you not understand D   U    T    C   H I E?
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
11 Mar 2015, 15:06
#51
11 Mar 2015, 15:06#51
 Saffex at his ducking and diving best. 
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
11 Mar 2015, 15:18
#52
11 Mar 2015, 15:18#52
Nope.....answer the question......I know English is not your first language......so have a think and try again  
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
11 Mar 2015, 15:49
#53
11 Mar 2015, 15:49#53
 The construction of your own sentence in your own first language was crap to start off with, you tool.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
11 Mar 2015, 16:20
#54
11 Mar 2015, 16:20#54
Nope it was not.....it is as plain as ever for anyone to interpret unless you are a complete idiot  
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
11 Mar 2015, 17:05
#55
11 Mar 2015, 17:05#55
 Yeah right.
"Was a spinner bowling to Miller you plank"..... is the same as: "It was not a spin bowler that was  bowling to Miller, you plank". Where did you go to school? The Eastern Cape? 
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
11 Mar 2015, 17:35
#56
11 Mar 2015, 17:35#56

Good one D    U    T    C    H    I   E........which part of those two sentences are you struggling with?

 

And while you are at it.......please explain how you reached the ignorant conclusion that I said Miller was facing a spinner.......take your time.

 

EC damn right and they taught me well........something you clearly missed out on.

 

There is thick and then we have this......hell even in your taal I would have seen the obvious.   

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
11 Mar 2015, 17:51
#57
11 Mar 2015, 17:51#57
I am not struggling with anything. It is you who are struggling to put a proper English sentence together. That first one could be interpreted as "(It) was a spinner that was bowling to Miller....". Easy as that.

Looks like my English (second language) teacher at my Afr medium school did a better job than your English (first language) teacher at your English medium school.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
11 Mar 2015, 18:22
#58
11 Mar 2015, 18:22#58

Bwhaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.........this is classical......so the D   U    T   C    H   M    A    N says my first sentence could have been interpreted with an 'It' in front of it........no you profoundly stupid man.......if I had intended an 'It' in front of my sentence, changing the meaning of the sentence in total, I would have inserted an 'It' you moron.

 

Talk about making a complete twak of yourself.......but please, please keep going

 

Your poor English teacher must be turning in her/his grave

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
11 Mar 2015, 19:19
#59
11 Mar 2015, 19:19#59
 How is that different from your phantom "not"?
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
11 Mar 2015, 21:19
#60
11 Mar 2015, 21:19#60
 Vlag, you misread his reply and fooked up. It happens, let it go. Let him have this one.
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
11 Mar 2015, 21:47
#61
11 Mar 2015, 21:47#61
Ceradunce admit he screwed up? LMAO! Yeah right, like that's ever going to happen! 
He'll probably post a never-ending series of long-winded and monotonous volumes explaining why he's right and everyone else is wrong which no-one else will ever bother to read. Won't be the first time. 
Sometimes I think Ceradunce tries to win arguments with the sheer volume of his sanctimonious and predictable replies together with his ability to bore people to death.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
11 Mar 2015, 23:10
#62
11 Mar 2015, 23:10#62
RooiAAS you hypocritical kettleblack. Did you admit you screwed up on RWC07? Did you admit you were laughably wrong about "imposter"? Nope you just slimed away. Admit those and a hundred other laughable mistakes and you can preach at others. How are the horses?
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
11 Mar 2015, 23:19
#63
11 Mar 2015, 23:19#63
 DbDraad

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1820 RE: Young pop guns fire blanks...weaknesses exposed
March 11, 2015, 21:19:46  Vlag, you misread his reply and fooked up. It happens, let it go. Let him have this one.


  • 0 Likes

You spotted a "not" in his sentence then?

In any case, none of that is important. What is important is that the clown is using all of this to try and escape that fact that he is mistaken in his claim that JP Duminy is a good enough bowler to be a front-line bowler.
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
12 Mar 2015, 02:49
#64
12 Mar 2015, 02:49#64
 He should have had a question mark at the end of his sentence in the first place and, yes I agree, JP is not a front line bowler.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
12 Mar 2015, 09:37
#65
12 Mar 2015, 09:37#65
Poor pathetic D   U   T   H   I   E has been owned. Poor old man is smarting no doubt.
A little suggestion moving forward.....pick your battles a little more wisely next time or better still stick to debating in your own taal.
Bwhaaahaaaaa


SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
12 Mar 2015, 09:39
#66
12 Mar 2015, 09:39#66
As for JP three balls don't define him and no one said he was a front line bowler but a handy part timer he is and one that has done a job for years. 
His bowling stats tell us that.
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
12 Mar 2015, 11:17
#67
12 Mar 2015, 11:17#67
@Dawie Kabouter. My, how the stooge has changed his story again. Suddenly Duminy has become a handy part time bowler. A handy part time bowler is not one that bowls for 10 overs per ODI. That is the role of the front line bowlers. By saying that Duminy should be bwoling 10 overs per game, you said, by implication, that he was a front line bowler. You have fallen flat on your face with that argument and are now trying to wriggle out of that one. 
You do not have the balls to admit that your grammar was crap and is trying to pin the stupidity on me. You seem  to have problems with your first language you bloody mamparra. Remember how you tried to wriggle out of your balls up when you used the exclamation marks? What a joke. Maybe you consider some kind of refresher course in basic English. 
BTW, I see QDK has managed to scrap together a few runs at just over 3 runs per over and your other hero, Miller got quite a  few runs as well. Just a pity that it was, once again, against one of the minnows.
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
12 Mar 2015, 11:19
#68
12 Mar 2015, 11:19#68
Has anybody heard anything about Rooinek? Haven't seen him around for quite some time.






Oh wait. There he is. Sitting in the corner with his thumb up his arse.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
13 Mar 2015, 11:18
#69
13 Mar 2015, 11:18#69

There is no reason in the world that a part time bowler cant bowl 10 over you profoundly stupid man.

 

We all know JP is a not a specialist bowler, no-one ever said he was so once again you are exposing yourself for the dunce you are. Kindly point out where I said he was a specialist bowler.

 

I have said he is better than a part timer and more than capable of bowling 10.......we all know he is a specialist bat who is a handy off spinner.

 

Why do I think he can do the job as a spinner.......for the simple reason that his bowling technique is spot on for a spinner as is his flight and the little turn he gets. His action and technique is better than Phangiso, the specialist spinner in the squad.

 

Exposed once again.....drum roll

 

— END OF THREAD —

More from Cricket