Young pop guns fire blanks...weaknesses exposed
Played them on their merits or would you have him try create something from nothing. SA were in shit, he was there to rebuild the innings.
But you are too thick to comprehend this obvious fact.......so because a bat does not score off 16 balls, when run rate is not an issue and wickets in hand are.....you conclude he was batting poorly.......I knew you knew little about the game, but you do keep confirming it.
Keep up the good work.
Next time I defend/leave 16 balls without scoring I'll be sure to conclude I'm doing a bad job.......what a joke
Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11657 RE: Young pop guns fire blanks...weaknesses exposed
March 10, 2015, 18:25:56 Was a spinner bowling to Miller you plank
Bullsh!t Bertie at work.
This was Miller's spell with the bat, facing only two bowlers, i.e. Wahab Riaz and Rahat Ali (who got his wicket). Care to explain to us which one of those two is the spinner that was bowling to Miller? You might find that Riaz is a left-arm fast bowler and Ali is a left-arm fast-medium. Who is the plank now?
Slightly nervy times for SA fans at the ground as David Miller saunters ever so smoothly to the middle
12.3Wahab Riaz to Miller, no run, tries him out with a full delivery on middle and leg which is defended back to the bowler
12.4Wahab Riaz to Miller, no run, "ooooohhh" goes around the ground as he fires in a sharp bouncer which has Miller weaving out of its path
12.5Wahab Riaz to Miller, no run, tries to steer away a run through point, but is unable to do so in the end
12.6Wahab Riaz to Miller, no run, short outside of off as Millar initially looked to have a go before withholding at the last moment
Has been a wonderful fightback from Pakistan in these last few overs to turn this match into a contest
End of over 13 (wicket maiden) South Africa 74/4 (158 runs required from 34 overs, RR: 5.69, RRR: 4.64)
-
- DA Miller 0 (4b)
- AB de Villiers 1 (7b)
-
- Wahab Riaz 2-2-0-2
- Rahat Ali 3-1-17-1
Rahat Ali to de Villiers, no run, AB pokes at this one going across him to the keeper as he looked a touch hesitant in going for it
13.2Rahat Ali to de Villiers, no run, keeping it nice and tight on that fourth/fifth stump line as AB fends away to the off side
13.3Rahat Ali to de Villiers, no run, short of a length which gets good carry off the deck as it flew through to the keeper
13.4Rahat Ali to de Villiers, no run, back of the length on the pads which is tucked away towards midwicket, but they can't pinch the run
13.5Rahat Ali to de Villiers, 1 run, clips away this length delivery off the pads as they are able to scamper through for the run
13.6Rahat Ali to Miller, no run, fuller one outside off which is defended away carefully to the off side
Aron: "From 67/2 to 74/4, I wasn't surprised at all, we can expect this kind of collapse in Modern Cricket, Good comeback by Pakistan.."
End of over 14 (1 run) South Africa 75/4 (157 runs required from 33 overs, RR: 5.35, RRR: 4.75)
-
- DA Miller 0 (5b)
- AB de Villiers 2 (12b)
-
- Rahat Ali 4-1-18-1
- Wahab Riaz 2-2-0-2
Wahab Riaz to de Villiers, 1 run, punches away this back of a length straight down the ground through long off
14.2Wahab Riaz to Miller, no run, tries to steer this length delivery to the left of the bowler, who got down on all fours in an attempt to cut this one off
14.3Wahab Riaz to Miller, no run, guides away this back of a length towards the off side
14.4Wahab Riaz to Miller, no run, Riaz is on another level at the moment as he fires through a 138kph back of a length delivery which Miller looked to nurdle away through the leg side, but the ball ends up shaping away slightly on the way to the keeper
14.5Wahab Riaz to Miller, no run, tries to work a single through the leg side, but is unable to find the space he required
14.6Wahab Riaz to Miller, no run, fails to time away this slightly short and wide delivery through cover point, as the ball ends up nearby on the off side
Ibrahim: "Wahab Got us back in game. Well Done boy.. We Can do it "
End of over 15 (1 run) South Africa 76/4 (156 runs required from 32 overs, RR: 5.06, RRR: 4.87)
-
- DA Miller 0 (10b)
- AB de Villiers 3 (13b)
-
- Wahab Riaz 3-2-1-2
- Rahat Ali 4-1-18-1
Rahat Ali to de Villiers, no run, looking to guide this one through cover point, but picks out the point fielder instead
15.2Rahat Ali to de Villiers, 1 run, moves over to the off stump before clipping away this full delivery on the stumps through fine leg
15.3Rahat Ali to Miller, no run, tails in on a fuller length outside of off as Miller plays outside of the line in an attempt to get this through extra-cover
15.4Rahat Ali to Miller, no run, turns away this length delivery onto the leg side, but finds the close-in fielder soon after
15.5Rahat Ali to Miller, OUT, unleashes a wonderful yorker on middle which Miller appears to be late on. Looked out as soon as it struck really. Miller wants the review though. Replays show this went on to hit the back pad, so that may hurt his chances for this being given, but it is red all the way down, so Miller has to go, and South Africa are now five down with still quite a bit to do
If you look closely you will see that it looked like Miller had no answer to the bowling of these two.
Wow Vlagshit are you really this stupid? Your angle was...'Weren't you trying to convince me how easy it was hitting Duminy for 11 runs per over on a field the size of a rugby field?'
My counter was that Miller was NOT facing a spinner on a rugby field. Hello!!!!!
Firstly JP got smacked by a guy who had his eye in and was an opener when the pressure was not on and chose to attack him given firstly he is a spinner and secondly the field was tiny.
Miller on the otherhand had only just got in, his side was in shit and he was there to steady the ship before launching an attack......he never got to that point because he was undone by a great Yorker........one that according to Moz looked better as Miller is a opo gun.......what utter ignorant crap.
But hey ho you lot are a real tonic when it comes to cricket.......you lot have clearly played very little of this lovely game for your appreciation of the art is a big fat ZERO.
"Was a spinner bowling to Miller you plank"..... is the same as: "It was not a spin bowler that was bowling to Miller, you plank". Where did you go to school? The Eastern Cape?
Good one D U T C H I E........which part of those two sentences are you struggling with?
And while you are at it.......please explain how you reached the ignorant conclusion that I said Miller was facing a spinner.......take your time.
EC damn right and they taught me well........something you clearly missed out on.
There is thick and then we have this......hell even in your taal I would have seen the obvious.
Looks like my English (second language) teacher at my Afr medium school did a better job than your English (first language) teacher at your English medium school.
Bwhaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.........this is classical......so the D U T C H M A N says my first sentence could have been interpreted with an 'It' in front of it........no you profoundly stupid man.......if I had intended an 'It' in front of my sentence, changing the meaning of the sentence in total, I would have inserted an 'It' you moron.
Talk about making a complete twak of yourself.......but please, please keep going
Your poor English teacher must be turning in her/his grave
He'll probably post a never-ending series of long-winded and monotonous volumes explaining why he's right and everyone else is wrong which no-one else will ever bother to read. Won't be the first time.
Sometimes I think Ceradunce tries to win arguments with the sheer volume of his sanctimonious and predictable replies together with his ability to bore people to death.
Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1820 RE: Young pop guns fire blanks...weaknesses exposed
March 11, 2015, 21:19:46 Vlag, you misread his reply and fooked up. It happens, let it go. Let him have this one.
You spotted a "not" in his sentence then?
In any case, none of that is important. What is important is that the clown is using all of this to try and escape that fact that he is mistaken in his claim that JP Duminy is a good enough bowler to be a front-line bowler.
A little suggestion moving forward.....pick your battles a little more wisely next time or better still stick to debating in your own taal.
Bwhaaahaaaaa
His bowling stats tell us that.
You do not have the balls to admit that your grammar was crap and is trying to pin the stupidity on me. You seem to have problems with your first language you bloody mamparra. Remember how you tried to wriggle out of your balls up when you used the exclamation marks? What a joke. Maybe you consider some kind of refresher course in basic English.
BTW, I see QDK has managed to scrap together a few runs at just over 3 runs per over and your other hero, Miller got quite a few runs as well. Just a pity that it was, once again, against one of the minnows.
Oh wait. There he is. Sitting in the corner with his thumb up his arse.
There is no reason in the world that a part time bowler cant bowl 10 over you profoundly stupid man.
We all know JP is a not a specialist bowler, no-one ever said he was so once again you are exposing yourself for the dunce you are. Kindly point out where I said he was a specialist bowler.
I have said he is better than a part timer and more than capable of bowling 10.......we all know he is a specialist bat who is a handy off spinner.
Why do I think he can do the job as a spinner.......for the simple reason that his bowling technique is spot on for a spinner as is his flight and the little turn he gets. His action and technique is better than Phangiso, the specialist spinner in the squad.
Exposed once again.....drum roll
More from Cricket
- CricketSo our Protea women9 REPLIES · 865 VIEWS
- CricketNice win by our ladies7 REPLIES · 564 VIEWS
- CricketRooi, here you were wondering about Keshav0 REPLIES · 500 VIEWS
- CricketICC Women's T20 Rankings0 REPLIES · 927 VIEWS
- CricketWC semi final live23 REPLIES · 933 VIEWS
- CricketIt’s going to4 REPLIES · 1,010 VIEWS