Because she presented an immediate threat..... the vehicle was a weapon, and she utilised it.
She wasn't an immediate threat, he was to the side of the car. There is no possible way of knowing if the victim was trying to deliberately hit the ICE agent with her car. Nothing that the footage or nothing that we so far know about her indicates she would of deliberately turned her vehicle into a weapon.
I don't agree
This isn't a thing you can disagree with there is literally footage of the where the shot was fired from and photo's of where the bullet hole in the windscreen, it clearly shows the first shot was not straight through the front widescreen. The office is clearly at a 45 degree angle his lower body is clearly to the side of the car.
Yeah... and she speeds away and kills a innocent pedestrian or other officer and then you will be blaming the officer for not stopping the initial threat.... you would never be happy with any outcome.
Yeah because there wouldn't be an armed masked militia force going around creating situations like this in the first place.
You don't know that, neither do I ..... although I doubt it is true
Had any investigation been concluded by that point, had any evidence being produced. Remember this came from Trump who when asked about his delayed response to the Charlotteville incident responded he liked to get all the facts first and he is clearly politicising it to cover his own ass.
You don't know shit Stav......
So she makes a run for it and they give chase..... and she ends up wiping out an entire family in a SUV just 4 blocks away ........ yet they had the opportunity to stop her there
You stop the initial threat......if you want to be stupid enough to ride, ram or direct your vehicle towards ANY officer of the law, in any way..... accept the consequences.
What I do know is that in no other western country would we see a police force act like that, outside exceptional circumstances where an armed response team is specifically brought into to make an arrest of a suspect believed to be highly dangerous or them potentially manning roadblocks in response to a terrorist incident, you're not going see a police officers wearing mask walk up in aggressive manner to a person in a stopped car shouting get the fuck out of the car, you're not going see another masked office point a gun at the person, and even if the a police officer was hit/glanced/pushed in the manner that ICE officer it would of still been very unlikely the officer would of discharged his firearm.
Not only did their behaviour likely create the situation where the women instinctively tried to flee and not only did they create a risk of someone being injured by creating an out of control car, but even the firing of the weapon was dangerous in itself, as there was another civilian on the other side of the car not far off being directly inline with officer who fired his gun.
The UK police would of for example not created that situation in first place, but facing a similar situation of a fleeing vehicles they would of likely simply called in the number plate on the car and sent someone round to her house to arrest her or at least caution her for dangerous driving. Yes there can be high speed pursuits in the UK but it's likely a criminal fleeing a crime or arrest, not some random civilian who will almost certainly pull over at the first sign of police light.
I wonder how many of those 1 301 officers deliberately spent months or years of training..... just to do that......
I dunno, but both the Trump administration and people like you defending it will only encourage more of it because these people will think they have immunity. I can also tell you the number is far lower for police in other western countries. Checks the number of death by police shootings in Ireland, and since 2020, the number is...1.