Anti-Evolution...

 Would your Jesus support Putin ?

Nope...peace on earth and an end to war...some day...

">

Limk please moonrover, from what I have found all women can be traced back to one woman but most but not all men are not linked to one man, and more they don't believe that they even mated with each other.

Also they state that they were not the first people either, they had ancestors as well.

Why do you keep stating blatantly false information, you can't keep people swimming in shit these days you know, Anyone can spend 2 minutes on the net and see the facts. I thought you god said lying is a sin but you keep right on doing it.

Also still waiting for how 1500 species turned into 5 million in 4000 years of you just going to carry on ignoring it because its got you fucked?

Yes, I'm also interested to see Bendover's sources. Bet you it's an Intelligent Design website!

LMAO!

I do enjoy laughing at a Christian Fundamentalist that bases his reality on Sunday school teachings for 3-year-olds. This simpleton has been brainwashed so far, there is no turning back.

He gets angry when his dogma is challenged, because deep down he feels an increasing certainty that he is basing his reality on BS

Many people who consider themselves religious accept evolution (including Church Priests), and therefore the Bible can't be taken literally - only figuratively (at least for those that subscribe to religion)

For others, the Bible can't be taken figuratively either...

Awe shucks

I have some bananas here for you apes. I mean you want to be apes.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/8-things-you-didnt-know-about-bananas

So you have proved you put up a link, now how about one that supports your lies.

I guess you can't answer your hyper speed evolution beliefs with any facts either. since you're doing the Christians standard tactic of changing the subject.

Typical lying pratt, gets called out for posting lies and just ignores it. If you can't support your claims then we all know it just more apologist bullshit like usual.

I don't  care what he thinks but posting blatant lies fucks me off.

If I started posting lies about what the Bible says I am sure he would be amongst the first to call me out and rightly so.

He is either a outright liar or poor gullible fool that only listens to scam artists.

So have you traced your ape ancestors?

Only have to go back 10 million years. 

Piece of cake. Dig some bones out of a hill and call her great, great, grandmother Lucy??

Stop showing your ignorance Homsapiens are believed to be around for approx 300,00 years.

Your ignorance is truely unbelievable 

Even "Lucy" is not that old, her species (Austropithicus)  existed approximately  3.5 million years ago.

Really you have stop showing you inbred stupidity. You are a prime example of what inbreeding produces, do you play the banjo by any chance?

Sure I saw you in deliverance, tell me what was Burt Renolds like ( if you can remember that is)

You know he was the main star, I can post a pic if you can't remember who that is.

Post one more arrogant lie and I will start the same shit with you book of ignorance.

I can't believe such stupidity exists in this day of information. It hurts my brain that such idiots can still exist in this day and age.

Hey Sader, you are the missing link. 

Probably am but at least you are the end of the line for your branch thank fuck.

World won't miss morons like you that for sure.

How does it feel to be the dead end branch for you line of morons? (well for your inbred  branch anyway, unfortunately there are many more offshoots that we are still waiting to die out from stupidity)

Have to admit we are surprised that your lineage has lasted so long, must have got lucky somewhere an intelligent one decided to breed with one of your recent ancestors (guess his horniness over came his intelligence, suppose your ancestors were lucky he was thinking with his little head)

Oh God, Rooi is gonna love this, but who cares...

I have a question for you Deus.

Evolutionary algorithms are based on evolution. The cumulative effect of small adaptations resulting in larger and more useful changes/outcomes over time...or in the case of algorithms(hitting the fast forward button) and skipping to the result. We know these algorithms work and are widely used. They simply stack small positives through generations...small positives like the micro-adaptations that you mention.

Evolutionary algorithms are also used in all three branches of machine learning as a sub-set within the field. 

Meaning, we know that the concept of evolution is able to produce complexity and diversity from rather simple beginnings. I'm not sure that efficient optimization is even possible without evolutionary algorithms these days...considering the size of data sets. 

So here's my question. Are you saying that speciation did not occur or are you saying you're only willing to believe what is observable without extrapolating beyond that?

To me, evolution makes sense and does not exclude a creator. I've mentioned that here before.

There is no theory of evolution, not even a hypothesis.

After 160 years of Darwinism, science needs a better theory to explain how diversity arises and a theory to explain why species remain unchanged without gradually evolving into something significantly different.

Want some more bananas? 

Ask Sharkbok maybe he was a Banana Boy before with 50% DNA of a banana. 

You know what, you might actually be living proof that there is a god, according to evolution you shouldn't be able to breath let alone type anything while lacking a brain. You could be the miracle god botherers are looking for.

FYI Evolution is a scientific theory (which means its a fact) I know it is hard for you to comprehend. Mind you I am sure you are still trying to solve the question of what 1+1 equals let alone anything more complex.

Hey apeman we need some more of you in our zoo. 

Then people will believe in the missing link.

The species Homo Sapiens is part of the family Hominidae which are the apes.

We're all apes according to the scientific classification . . . well, except for the shape-shifting lizards that your hero David Icke believes in.

LMAO!

"FYI Evolution is a scientific theory (which means its a fact) I know it is hard for you to comprehend."

"A theory never becomes a fact. It is an explanation of one or more facts. A well-supported evidence-based theory becomes acceptable until disproved. It never evolves to a fact, and that's a fact."

LolZZZ tell us more about your science skills, Sader.

Why not start with the basics, like pre-101 terminology, before you start trying to persuade people?

I promise you'll see better results.

Here, I asked ChatGPt to explain the difference to you. There are some big words and relatively abstract concepts involved, so just go slow...okay?

The relationship between theory and fact in science is often misunderstood. In science, theories are not meant to be "proven" or become "facts" in the sense of absolute and unchangeable truth. Instead, theories are explanations for observed phenomena that have been repeatedly tested and supported by empirical evidence.

Theories are developed based on observations and experimental evidence, and they are used to make predictions about future observations and experiments. A scientific theory must be able to explain a wide range of phenomena and must be supported by a large body of evidence. However, even the most well-supported theories can be revised or overturned in light of new evidence or a better theoretical framework.

The scientific process involves continually refining and updating theories based on new evidence and observations. As a result, scientific knowledge is always tentative and subject to revision. This is the strength of science: it is always open to new evidence and willing to revise its theories when the evidence warrants it. So, while a scientific theory may never become an absolute fact, it can provide a very good explanation for a wide range of observations and can guide further scientific inquiry.

ButtPlug, I know you didn't have the character or the integrity to admit your hilarious misunderstandings on this thread, but that doesn't change the fact that you are either very stupid or else you don't understand plain English. Just scroll up and look for the word "bingo" if you'd like proof of that.

I'd be careful about commenting on other people's comprehension skills if I were you . . . especially on this particular thread where you got so much egg all over your stupid face.

Just saying . . .

whahaha!!!!

That's not what I was commenting on. His misuse of the words theory and fact have nothing to do with comprehension skills and everything to do with now knowing the difference between theory and fact.

Pretty ironic, you mention comprehension skills and make a comprehension error while doing so. 

What a plank.

"Whahaha the silly fool didn't understand what you were saying, Deus!

Read what he said again, RooiMoron."

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Calm down rooibeg

Here have another banana. 

Perhaps it's good that you get one under the belt, Rooi. 

A man can't lose every day forever...

Great Video this...

Are you one of the morons that thinks  that a scientific theory means it's just a hypothesis?

That sort of ignorance is the domain of creationist.

" This from the egg-faced and gullible half-wit who believes so vociferously and so fervently in things that turn out to be fictional"

...go on?