So hang on, Stav expresses his surprise that there might still be anti-evolutionists among us, I quote what Doos XL said to show that yes, there's at least one and then you start unravelling and mouthing off how dumb I must be to think Doos XL doesn't believe in evolution?
There's only one person making a complete dick of himself here . . . well, two if you count Doos XL.
Okay, so you're saying Doos XL does in fact believe in evolution?
LMAO!
You still there ButtPlug? Is your wall okay?
Ok, let's try one last time...
Were you correct, it would mean that Deus is saying that scientists are anti-evolutionist.
"Another term for an anti-evolutionist is a scientist or a person who believes in science. "
So, let me ask you, is that what you think he was saying?
Are you starting to see how far you'll stretch reality only to slam into a wall?
Ummm . . . I think he's saying that real scientists are anti-evolutionists and anyone who believes in evolution does not believe in science.
You did see his post with the cartoon of Darwin, right? That wasn't your first red flag? Huh ButtPlug?
PS Doos XL, feel free to step in here and confirm whether you are an evolutionist or an anti-evolutionist.
Hmmm . . . ButtPlug seems to have beaten a retreat.
I'm guessing he's finally realized just what a complete and utter fool he's made of himself on this thread and has gone to wipe all that egg off his face. If that is the case, he'll be a while still . . .
ButtPlug is busy studying.
Only 13 days until the exam.
LOL ou RooiTit, you're in for a surprise because, as usual, you've taken variables for granted.
Haha you'll see...
Can you at least answer the simple question . . . are you saying that Doos XL does believe in the theory of evolution?
It's just a "yes" or "no" required. Shouldn't use up too much of your study time.
Ex-Doos is a young earth creationist, of that we can be sure.
I know one when I see one. He is the missing link... missing brain cells...
Sharkbok, do you have any idea how ButtPlug might have interpreted what Doos XL said as meaning he (Doos XL) believes in evolution? Do any of ButtPlug's subsequent comments make any sense to you?
No, ButtPlug's comments make little to no sense, but they rarely do... Half the problem is that he is not sure what he does and does not believe in himself. And then he is also half Metonese...
So based on Doos XL comment: "Another term for an anti-evolutionist is a scientist or a person who believes in science.", would it be fair to say that that is an admission that he is anti-Evolution?
Just checking because if you read ButtPlug's subsequent shrieking replies, you'd swear I was the dull-witted moron who didn't understand what was being said . . . while all available evidence points to ButtPlug not having even a basic understanding of the English language . . . or else being terminally stupid . . . or both!
There are some atheists who think their ancestors were apes.
Rooibek is one above.....just grunting and growling...banging his chest.
He wants to be an ape.
Hate to be the one to break it to you, Bendover, but there are plenty of Christians who also believe in evolution.
Sorry if that means that the Happy Clappy charlatan who pockets your money every Sunday to finance his lavish lifestyle is talking crap . . . but it's true. Just ask a few of the bible-bashers on here.
Here, Numptus Maximus...
I let ChatCPT provide you with an explanation of the word "believe" as it pertains to science...
The word "believe" can be used to describe one's confidence in certain things, but it is not the most accurate word to describe confidence in science. Science is not based on belief or faith, but rather on evidence and empirical observations. When it comes to scientific knowledge, a more appropriate word to describe one's confidence would be "trust" or "have confidence in," rather than "believe."
So, while one may have faith or belief in their personal values, religious beliefs, or other things, it is not accurate to say that someone believes in science. Instead, they trust in the scientific method and the evidence produced by it, which is continually subjected to testing, refinement, and improvement.
It's hilarious that one actually has to explain this stuff to you guys...or let ChatGpt explain it.
Of course, ou VisKop is clueless as always.
For your information we are all Apes, even you moonrover
You may not like the idea but what you want has nothing to do with facts.
What scares you so much that you are basically related to most if not all life forms on this planet, I think it is an amazing thing.
I can only presume you see evolution puts glaring holes in you book of fables (which it does)
Evolution does not disprove a god but it does disprove your version of god
Religion AND Science leaves us with a lot of unanswered questions...If evolution was as simple as Darwinism would sugest, the universe should be crawling with signs of extraterrestrial life...regardless of the origin of life on Earth...life still seems to be preciously rare in the universe...if at all...not saying interstellar travel should be possible, but there's ways of making "presence" known without actually traveling to Earth....over 13 billion years...some galaxies have a couple or more billion years head start...
I have visited Cradle of Humankind.... hence surprised there's another Cradle of Human Culture.As with most finds around the globe, a skull is found, then there's huge fanfare but the accompanying bones are never found or put in place. Worldwide this occurs.150 years from Darwin and sadly dem bones are not showing up.
So Draad just out of interest how many planets that are similar to earth (you know, have an atmosphere, oceans, in the goldilock zone etc) have you visited?
So in the vastness of space which we have only just developing the technology to you expect us to have found signs of life already?
How many of the estimated 100 billion suns (so maybe 500 billion planets) do you think we have looked at?
Also if there is life out there it does not mean all of them are at our level of technology (remember its taken us over 4.5 billion years to get to where we are (thats almost a third of the time the universe has existed) The odds are that there is life out there and it is completely possible than more advanced races are out there or were and are long extinct
Also Darwin's Origin of species is about Evolution it does not mention anything about Abiogenesis (how life started) these are two separate issues.
Sorry but some people on here are so ignorant of the actual facts of evolution it is obvious none of you have even attempted to read up on the subject. You lot keep repeating the same old discredited ravings of the creation apologists that litter Youtube with their mindless attempts to fit the natural world into your book that was written before the dark ages. The mental gymnastics that tho se fools preform is truly outstanding..
Its basic facts the natural world in no way fits your supposed gods word (or the goat herders that made it up.
Darwin's Origin of Species was written over 150 years ago, and it did contain errors but plenty of it is correct and has been proven correct.
The knowledge and proof on the subject now you would need an entire library to hold. I notice your book is still about the same size just had things added or removed as man have tried to improve it (but failed just turned it into an even bigger mess than what they started with I expect).
Everyday we learn more and more about the world while you lot have not come up with any new arguments for a god in over 200 years. Hell your lot have spent 2,000 years trying to prove a god and your evidence still sits at ZERO.
Sader, Earth is about 5 billion years old. Look at how much our technology increased during the last 150 years...there should be millions of plants similair to ours in the galaxy, at least half of them more advanced than us. Imagine our technology over a million years from now...now imagine only one billion years...staggering.
Even with makeup I t is still fugly
Tante also wants flowing blonde hair...but it ain' t happening.
Billions of years? Where do they pluck these numbers from? It's certainly not science. Theories, held together by more theories, and aggressive resistance to anything and anyone who disagrees. Even threatening lives if needs be. This is the logic we are dealing with: the layers date the fossil, yet the fossil dates the layer. It's not about the pursuit of truth, it's about rejecting the Creator at any cost. The thought leaders of atheism are Luciferian, and that's the next step. The leftists are already there. Alice Bailey said it would be with the capture of the arts to subversively educate the common man into the theocracy of the ruling class. Each of these globalist loyalists we have here have a common trait: bitterness and self-aggrandizing.
So Doos XL, is it safe to say you're not an evolutionist?
I believe in micro evolution, better known as micro adaptations. The only observable form of evolution in the universe. No, I do not believe that a donkey can become a snail.
Thanks Doos XL.
Goodness me there's a lot of egg on this thread!
LMAO!
Just so we're absolutely clear, Doos XL, when you said this:
"Another term for an anti-evolutionist is a scientist or a person who believes in science. "
. . . are you saying that anti-evolutionists (like yourself) are following the correct science while those of us who do believe in Darwin's theory of evolution are rejecting real science and following a pseudo-science?
Jesus christ , stop watching retarded creation apologists evolution does not claim a fuckin donkey can become a snail.
The ignorance of some on here is astounding.
If you spent even a little time studying evolution you would know that these claims are fuckin bullshit.
Nor does science claim life came from bloody rocks.
Please do tell me who you watch or what you read that makes you make such ignorant claims.
You don't believe in evolution yet you believe in Noah's ark how did we get so many species in about 4,000 years from what is believed (by you lot) 1500 estimated "kinds" that survived the flood?
You obviously believe in super duper rapid evolution on a scale beyond imagination to now have approx 5 million species.
That is over 3 new species evolving every day for the last 4,000 years.
Would love to hear your explanation of how this happens, I wait with baited breath
Ja ja, but there's some dark patches in the "natural selection " narrative as well...some gaps to be filled.
Those are some mighty big gaps Mr Draad. Especially when it includes all of existence. Nice theory, if only they could find but one piece of evidence anywhere in the universe.
So Rooibek wants his jesus to be an ape too.He has a tarzan ape fantasy.
I have the genealogy for my Jesus ....right back to Adam.
A study of genetic barcodes has all of humanity descending from a single pair of adults.
These paleontologists and genetisists can run around for decades and in the end they will all agree on the bible.