I welcome and implore anybody that catches a man intentionally in a woman's bathroom to kick said man in the balls. And when they go down, to keep kicking them in the balls.
LOL and I thought it was supposed to the left that are the violent intolerant ones!
But I supposed I kinda respect that you're actually open about your bigotry, it's refreshing I guess.
The normal playbook;
1) Use words like "violence" to paint opposing views has dangerous.
2) If (1) doesn't work, then apply a label, in this case "bigot"...but use "Racist", "Nazi", "Homophobe", "Xenophobe" as required.
allow me to pre-empt steps (3) & (4)
3) If that fails, dismiss without engagement, reduce the argument to a caricature so it can be waved away.
4) And when all else fails, claim the debate itself is illegitimate, so no discussion is necessary.
Me - To all my ladies out there...kick any man in a girls bathroom right in the dick!
If I had a young daughter now in any bathroom and a man walks into that same bathroom space where she is busy, and he proceeds to relieve himself as a man in front of my daughter or just hang around to watch what she is doing, there won't just be a kick in the nuts ...there would be additional physical violence.
And if that is too violent for you Stav... or anyone else, and it makes me a bigot, then you have clearly never had a daughter, and if you have ever had a daughter, and that behaviour is still perfectly fine for you, then you have never been a father.
There are other forces at play, it's now known that CBS is making a huge play to buy another company which involves billions of dollars.
The deal would have to be approved by Trump.
So there, the plot thickens, Jimmy is just the meat between the sandwich.
As for free speech, yes it exists in the USA as long as it favours the authoritarian in the Oval Office.
lol DA
Ou Starrie is totally fine with some guy putting on a dress and then being allowed to be in women only spaces.
We're apparently bigots. But then...this is how things used to be...
"The urinary tether refers to the way shared or inadequate public bathroom facilities historically restricted women’s movement in society. Because public toilets were often designed for men and not equally available or safe for women, many women stayed close to home so they could return quickly when they needed the toilet. This “tethered” them geographically, limiting their freedom to travel, work, or participate in public life as fully as men could."
So the very un-bigoted Stav would like to see a return to a time pre woman's rights. A time when woman don't feel safe in places where they are meant to feel safe.
One can only laugh at how silly these people are.
1) Use words like "violence" to paint opposing views has dangerous.
What sort of insane level of gaslighting is this. Your literally advocating for physical violence against a group of people.
2) If (1) doesn't work, then apply a label, in this case "bigot"...but use "Racist", "Nazi", "Homophobe", "Xenophobe" as required.
What doesn't work. Simply question is punching or kicking someone repeatedly in the balls not a violent act?
I can use the term transphobe if your prefer.
3) If that fails, dismiss without engagement, reduce the argument to a caricature so it can be waved away.
Let's engage then, why do you think its acceptable to punch or kick a trans person in the balls? When I see a comment like your or DA's all I can imagine is that you believe transgenderism isn't really a thing, that trans people don't really believe or feel their of the opposite sex to that of which they were born too and that for the majority if not all the people claiming to be transwomen, its really just an excuse for perverts to get access to female only spaces so they can try to spy on partially naked women or commit acts of sexual violence against them. I mean I can understand that some women would genuinely feel uncomfortable in sharing a public bathroom with a transwomen but I'm not not exactly convinced that women in general would feel any less uncomfortable with a man rushing into a bathroom to repeatedly punch or kick a transwomen in the crotch.
Any research conducted into the topic of transwomen in public bathrooms such as a study by the Williams Institute, a peer reviewed article in the Frontiers in Sociology and a UK Parliamentary Submission found no credible or statistical basis for the the claim that transwomen pose a heighten threat in public bathrooms, in-fact they found transwomen are more likely to be the victims of assaults in public bathrooms, and frankly from reading posts like yours that doesn't surprise me in the slightest.
Now by all mean's if you have some other reason why you think its okay to punch/kick transwomen in public bathrooms please feel free to enlighten me.
If I had a young daughter now in any bathroom and a man walks into that same bathroom space where she is busy, and he proceeds to relieve himself as a man in front of my daughter or just hang around to watch what she is doing, there won't just be a kick in the nuts ...there would be additional physical violence.
I can't believe I need to explain this, but do you not know the mechanics of how women go to the loo?
You do realise there isn't urinals in women's bathroom. There is individual private cubicles with lockable doors. A transwomen is not going to relieve themselves in front of anyone, they will be in f**king cubicle with the door closed.
Now if a man, women, or transwomen or transman exposed themselves on purpose to a child of mine or was trying to see them naked in any situation or location, I would immediately get my child out of their and contact the police. If they where attempting to assault my child, I would use any mean's at my disposal to stop what their doing, including physical violence to stop them and then call the police.
And if that is too violent for you Stav... or anyone else, and it makes me a bigot, then you have clearly never had a daughter, and if you have ever had a daughter, and that behaviour is still perfectly fine for you, then you have never been a father.
I don't have an issue with you using physical violence in such a situation. My issue is that your singling out transwomen as more likely to be preparators of such crimes when their is no supporting evidence and that in my book is transphobe bigotry. Something I would never teach my kids to be.
BB
Neo-fascism usually includes ultranationalism, ultraconservatism, racial supremacy, right-wing populism, authoritarianism, nativism, xenophobia, and anti-immigration sentiment, as well as opposition to social democracy, parliamentarianism, Marxism, communism, socialism, liberalism, neoliberalism, and liberal democracy.
Wh ere do you get t he above BS, Nationalism is not ultra nationalism - you ae either [prooud of your country or you hate it like ;efists are alwaays guilty of. There is no ultra-comsevarism in the USA - the Republicans are a centrist Party with some elements of cente righ present . The Democrats are a Leftist Party and a large level of Ultra-left present in the Party, no racial superirty present in any party, Authorization was present under the Biden Autopen Regime through weaponizing of the Justice Department and people they think opposed them - theey even used the F BY to spy on 1,3 millian people, The also tried to censorthe media through ana ttempt to establsih a disinformation biard in the WH - but even some Democrats opposed it and it enve got off th e ground. Open Borders is shot - especially since it allows criminals and terroristss into the country, There is no policy in the USA that ban legal immigration at all, Xenophobia - total BS again - no proof of it existing in th e USA at all. =There are millions of Indians, Chinese and countrues from all over the globe living in he USA after legally applying and allowing them to enter the country - VP Vance is married to a lady frinm Indian descent and there are many Chinese and Indian people elected to political position - so shit again..
I am not sure where you find any signs of Social Democracy other than elements linked to the Democratic Party and they have policies close to communism operating in political position in the USA. Nobody has acrted against them despite the links to instigating riots in the USA like in the major riots in 2020 and the college riots last year, There are strong links between the ultra-left wing of the Democrats to marxism and communism - whicj can only survive under dictatorial regimes and as pointed above the Ciden Autopen Regime tried to involke totalitarianism in the USA, By h e way Socialism is a policy that estroyed he eonomoies of many countris and like Marxism is a faied ideology,
Thirdly their is no such thing as liberal democracy - there is only demcoracy - in some countries teir are liberal parties .in Government and they no better than to implement the system the Denocrats tried to implement in the USA,
So where did you got the BS you quote from?
...it's a man baybe!!!
AI ouMaaik AI :)
Starrie, guys with dresses on are not woman.
You can call them trans woman, wannabe girls or unicorns, but they're men in dresses.
It's got nothing to do with assuming trans people are more likely to attempt to sexually assault women or girls. Nice try though.
You're making it about the trans woman and their "rights" but seem to be skirting the rights of biological woman and their rights to bathrooms and change rooms that are their spaces.
If it's got balls, it's doesn't belong in the lady loos, bud. No amount mental gymnastics will change that.
All this Anger goodness…sadly not reflected in the views of his countrymen:
The Countess last month commissioned the first-ever independent survey into attitudes to gender in Ireland. It has revealed widespread support among the Irish public for single-sex spaces, services and sports.
…….
How now brown cow?
Only 55% said no men in women's sport?...and 21% in favour...1 in five !!!
It makes sense though. Europe lost its balls long ago.
It's a post-op trans continent at this point.
Nice to see England fighting back.
England is trying to, Plum.
No need for all this nonsense
How is one not supposed to be cynical about all these things?
The internet has been completely weaponised to amplify unreasonable ideas under the guise of morality.
It's like there is one in a hundred people affected by something, there is already a reasonable solution for their problem, but an argument is created around the the idea that the current solution isn't moral enough.
And before you know it, the other 99 people hate each other as a result of the ensuing debate. And it's all amplified and bounced back off of the population through social media algorithms. And then mainstream media has to jump on board because these platform outstrips the landscape they formally dominated and they need to remain relevant...
At this point, I'm not sure whether China is behind this or if it's just Big Tech and the bottom line. It's like everybody in the West hate each other because of these stupid woke ideas, but when you look at Eastern countries, they're predominantly homogenous in their thinking. Yes, i know Nepal has issues right now, Sri Lanka always has problems...but the problems they have are the same category of problem that the West have had. What the West is experiencing is a brand new problem.
It's like the currency of attention has been weaponised against society through smartphones.
I heard a comparison recently. I'll ask chat to lay it out;
"In the 19th century, railroads(which are networks) spread slowly across the U.S., giving lawmakers time to recognize problems and build regulatory frameworks as the industry matured. By contrast, modern social media platforms(which are also networks) like Snapchat or TikTok scale almost overnight. Their networks evolve so quickly that regulators are always stuck dealing with yesterday’s issues while new ones emerge.
This “action/time gap” is where Big Tech thrives. By moving faster than governments can legislate, tech companies operate with minimal restraint, capturing profits while externalizing the social costs—whether that’s misinformation, privacy erosion, or mental health fallout. The open question is whether these firms genuinely serve the public interest or whether they’re content to watch society destabilize as long as revenue climbs.
To be more cynical still, the contest may not be just company versus society, but hemisphere versus hemisphere: East and West using platforms, algorithms, and influence campaigns as tools of soft power. In that light, Big Tech isn’t just moving faster than regulators—it may also be shaping geopolitics in ways democratic oversight can’t reach."
Now, tell me that isn't terrifying!?
Anyone else unable to post and getting a notification about not having permission?
Yep, for a days I couldn't even access this forum in any way.... it told me I did not have the necessary permissions
Guess we got banned :D
https://www.ruckersforum.com/forum/bobbok--/-403--forbidden-access-is-denied-/53207
Link to Bob's thread about it a while ago.
"...The 403 error you get may be becauseyou are trying to get on to an article which we have removed OR because your profile was marked as a high risk profile due to certain content (maybe racial?). It then gets blocked for 24 hours.
If it does happen, feel free to drop me an email to investigate.
Cheers
Ed..."
I mean I can understand that some women would genuinely feel uncomfortable in sharing a public bathroom with a transwomen
I think it's quite a bit more than just "some" women"
Back in 2024, a YouGov poll in the UK consistently showed that over 50% of women did not want this to happen.
33% said trans women should be allowed, 51% said no, 16% don't know
37% in favour, 47% against, 16% don't know
26% in favour, 58% against, 16% don't know
29% in favour, 55% against, 16% don't know
27% in favour, 56% against, 17% don't know
30% in favour, 52% against, 18% don't know
20% in favour, 62% against, 18% don't know
22% in favour, 62% against, 18% don't know
Back in June of 2023 less than a third of all Brits supported trans women in women's changing rooms or toilets.
I guess you would get different results depending on where you pull your information from but from what I can see, there generally is a higher percentage of women against it than for it.
For instance, according to another UK poll by Censuswide in 2023, this poll, which was apparently reported by some national newspapers at the time, was a bit more specific. It found that 66% of British women believed that "biological men" should not be allowed to use women's lavatories, and only 15% said that they should, but there were concerns regarding the "politically charged" term of "biological men" in this poll, which they say likely influenced the high opposition to this happening.
There is no information which is solidly affirmative with any stance on this topic, because of the surgery vs non-surgery differences, as well as what specific terms are used in these polls, but one thing is quite clear..... and that is that no matter where you try and pull this information, it is that there are definitely a lot more than just "some" women that would genuinely feel uncomfortable sharing a public bathroom with a transwoman
Link to Bob's thread about it a while ago.
Cheers Db
hehe
BB
I am actually very sorry for you falling for all the shit spread by the media. You should by now know bette than come up with B S spreading on this site,
ABC is owned by threee major companies - one of them (Disney) - instructed ABC to let the show ack on show - the other two said no ways, So the show remained banned. So why did that happen? At the height of the Russsian Hoax lies spread by the FBI and CIA in 2018 the viewership of the Kimmell show had a high of 3,2 million viewers, Since then it decreased to 1,7 million vewers and was going down fast while costs attached to the show increased. So will the show be returned is very, very doutful at this stage.
You also fell down flat since the Republican Senators do not aupport wihdrawal license withdrawals from media guilty of spreading lies - the fear that the criminal-minded Democrats may gain power and they do not want precendents set and introduced media censorship like happened when the Autopen ruled in the WH. The efforts of the Autopen to establish a Disinformation Board in the WH and weekly meetings between WH, FBI and CIA with media represnetatives to prevent publication of news detrimental to the regime shocked them and caused them to oppose any precedents that the emocrats would abuse the system. So let the media kee[p spreading lies and them losing markets the way it is happening at present, So the US Government will not allow the situation tp becoeem a rpecednet t he criminally minded Demcorats can abuse.
As to Tylenol I would not wan a ban either - neither do I want a sitution where the Health Department became the corrupt arm of Big Pharma, The fact is statistically the USA is the most Unhealthy Country in the world as a result of a variety of reasons linked to dietary and even medical treatment of people, The Covid vaccines developed was in fact a farce since it does not prevent people spreading of the virus and gettng infected by the virus - nether did mask help either, People suffering from mrbidiis and got infected by Covid cused most deaths amongst people, So trillions was spent on non-effective vaccines while the death rate was high in teh case with people surffering from morbidities and Big Pharma had a field day in making trillions in profits,
The oth er fac as that the US Health Department illegally funded the gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Biolab w here according to relable information the pandemic started, Trump stopped the fidnding wh en he found ou what was going on and ordered a scientific investgation as t what cause the start of the pandemic - after the Health Department insisted the virus originated fronm the fish market in Wuhan, Any different opinion was censored on the insistance of the Health Department until Fucci was fred by TRump as his Covid advisor in September 2020. The Bden Autopen stopped the investigation and Biden announced that the FBI and CIA will within 3 months announced what the real situation was as to the origin of the Covid virus, Three monhs became a year and the final announcement was that there is no consensus on the issue of starting of the Covid pandemic, Six monts later Wray as head of the FBI admitted in House questioning that the virus originated in the Wuhan Lab. In fact the Health Department was corrupt and an arm of Big Pharma who did do fuck-all about deteriorating healt conditions in the USA - a total disgrace. As to Tylenol further investigtion is eded but hat ws happening is that in most cases of autism the amjority of mothers pof ch idren borne with atism the mother use Tylenol was in evidence, Further research needs to be undertaken - but Big Pharm does not want it to happen and that ia a disgrace as well.
I warned you before - beware of media lies and distortions you always spread on site, It makes you look silly and guilty of inability to t hink about issues by yourself,
.
net4oom
For now...his show will disappear before the end of Trump's term...the market for petulant "resistance " is getting smaller by the day...money talks.
Jesus, the fake emotion. Coming from the guy who told people who didn't want to get vaccinated to "Rest in peace, Wheezy" during the pandemic. Yeah, I'm totally sold on his "compassion". Not.
The fact that the Democrats claim as being free speech is not applicable to liars whop delibnerately lie about issues - that is not free speech at all ad in fact is a blatant attack on free speech. Kimmell lied and knew he lied aboutht eh shpter of Kirk and some idiots support his lies even on thios site,
Afer being shot at and wounded in one assassination attempt and a second one thwarted - and after ten years lying abou Russian Collusion by thsi typr pf [erspn - I do not blame Trump for his reaction to Kimmell lies. Hopweverm his cmment is not really leading to anyth ing and the Republicn Party will not allow stopping this man from disgracing himself.
This is the same amn tha did not coemment on the censorship efforts of the Autopen regime to censor news and free speech and was stopped when the uproar followed, For Kimmell and his comrades they must have free speech - for opponents of their ideas there should be no free speech,
Cruz and other Republicans opposed action against media lies and the reason was that it would create a precedent that the corrupt skunks from the Democratic Party teh D P would isuse torealy undermine opposition to their regime. Kimmell is usig ot to create sympathy for him knowing full well it will not be introduced by the Republican Party. Bit attempt at attacking free speech by the Autopen Regime they supported and in the end was thwarted by the Courts.
However, Draad is right - while th FBI and CIA was leaking lies to the media for a decade Kimmell and his illk supported the lies, Now he is on tin ice as a reward, Kmme;;'s voewership in 2018 at teh time of the Russian Collussion lies was 3,2 million viewrs - it is now down to 1,7 million viewers amd te tme will come inveditably that his progam would not be financally viable and then he qould blame it on Trump and not their failure to enhance viewership through being honest.
.
We need honest, but responsible journalism, the Kimmels of the world are just creating more hatred.
Really?
What's honest about Trump?
What about Trump organizing the J6 rally to take the presidency by force Hmmm?
Call that honest Huh!
Listen Sucker, your hero is a proven low life liar and has divided America like no-one else.....he's the most shameless divisive POTUS ever.
And like you he can't stand being criticized.......that's right, you have much in common.
Get that into your head.
What did Churchill say about free speech?
Everyone is in favor of free speech. Hardly a day passes without its being extolled, but some people's idea of it is that they are free to say what they like, but if anyone else says anything back, that is an outrage.
Wtf. here we've Batshit & his budgies upset over what a comedian said.
Moffie used to sing the praises of this website to high heaven for its tolerance and its non-restriction of free speech. Look at him now, first and foremost in the queue to jump on free speech and knock it on its head after his master threatened NBC.
The Ferret is a daily revelation, he has zero credibility.
Fancy mentioning honesty and Trump in the same breath........the hide, the stinking audacity and the delusional.
Delusional is the wrong word Moron, it’s an adjective ….you want ‘delusion’. But still if I were you I’d stick to simpler words, they are more authentic in your case,
The laugh Moffie is you, Trump and honesty......you can't be serious, that's like trying to mix oil with water, spin yourself out of that one.
Moron!
Actually I’m willing to debate anything with practically anybody. But you are unhinged, just as your whole world revolved around race, it now also revolves around Trump. No point talking to a nutter.
And speaking about delusional…it’s still delusion,
What a sad attempt at an apology
Appparently, according to media rumours, Kimmel was under a lot of pressure to not apologise when he came back on air, otherwise his writers were going to walk out on him, because these writers still maintained that he said nothing wrong to begin with.
Kimmel tried to make it sound like he never said what he actually very clearly said, especially about MAGA, which as usual came across as just extremely poor and pathetic, which is exactly what I have always called him and the other Jimmy moron.
What he should have said if he had an ounce of decency is the whole thing got away from him.. that he tried to be smart instead of simply understanding the human tragedy that occurred. And then apologized to Charlie’s family and friends with a bit of sincerity. Assuming of course he has shred of empathy
No empathy only Turbo TDS 24/7...like a "few" other people...
No empathy only Turbo TDS 24/7...like a "few" other people...
Empathy se gat ... more like despair as an angry & totally unhinged Batshit careens onward with his madcap mission of vengeance. Skoon bevok.
No point talking to a nutter
There was no bigger nutter than Beeno and he was your favorite board mate....you never raised an alarm.
Besides that, you don't sincerely debate, you spin, never wrong and you put posters down.
As I repeatedly tell you.....you're a top bloke as long as one agrees with everything you say.
Kapeesh?