....and beware of the dark angel of death, Victoria Nuland, wherever see sows her evil spawn.
The US exposes its deceitful
nature by promising to help developing countries
Assisting poor nations is
never the true motivation for Washington. All it wants is to rule the world
The US, accustomed to
profiting from wars and conflicts, relying on a spirit of hegemony and ‘world
domination’, has in recent years been attempting to rally the so-called
democratic G7 partners to jointly oppose China’s influence and counter its Belt
and Road initiative.
To this end, the Americans
have launched a global infrastructure program for developing countries in Latin
America, Africa, and Asia. In the end, however, they have failed to deliver on
their promises, which were never sincere to begin with.
In order to maintain its own
international hegemony, the US suppresses human rights in other countries,
interferes in their internal affairs, and violates the international order and
system based on the purposes and principles enshrined in the UN Charter.
Washington withdraws from various groups and agreements at every opportunity,
shirks international responsibility, undermines the basis of global cooperation
based on mutual trust, often adopts unjust sanctions, and resorts to military
action. All this leads to chaos in various parts of the world and causes
serious humanitarian disasters.
The Biden administration
launched the Build Back Better World (B3W) initiative at the G7 summit in 2021.
It failed miserably, but was effectively replaced the following year by similar
‘fluff’ announced under a different banner – the Partnership for Global
Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) plan.
Given the lack of specific
initial agreements and the vague wording and deadlines in the aforementioned
projects, it is clear that Washington will not achieve its goal, and that its
attempts to fool the world will not succeed.
For example, PGII’s investment
goals have been reduced from $40 trillion by 2035 to $600 billion in the next
five years. Given US electoral politics, all this could actually be seen as
manipulation of numbers and duping the public.
Furthermore, unlike the
large-scale Chinese initiative, it is assumed that funding for US
infrastructure projects will come mainly from private investors and is
therefore not guaranteed. Two-faced US politicians cannot fail to understand
that it will be difficult to convince the investment funds involved in the
projects that they will be able to profit. In addition, there is a significant
risk of investing in projects in countries where markets may not be transparent
and the rule of law may not be up to the very same US ‘standards’.
As for government funding, it
must go through the approval process in the US Congress and can be blocked at
any time by the very same US legislators, who are only driven by short-term
profit and domestic political considerations.
Asian partners have no choice
but to be skeptical about the ability of the US to deliver, so they switch to
engagement with China, with which cooperation has long been mutually beneficial
and smooth.
The reason why US and Western
promises are not kept is that they simply do not have the capacity and the will
to implement them. US politicians face enormous pressure to improve their own
infrastructure. How can they afford to spend significant money on helping
developing countries? Furthermore, the US and NATO countries are now embroiled
in a campaign of armed support for Ukraine.
Since the beginning of the
Russia-Ukraine conflict, US media and political figures have not only failed to
call on the sides to negotiate and make peace, but have instead made efforts to
spread lies and inflame the situation. This exposes America’s true intentions
to profit from any crisis.
Washington’s stated ambition
of helping poor countries is not its first, second or even third motive, and
its real focus is on acting against China and Russia. Guided by its policy of
double standards and global hegemony, the US is trying to block Beijing’s
access to advanced technologies and put a brake on the Belt and Road program.
However, due to its lack of concrete strategy, as well as its deceitful nature,
the US is unable to seriously compete with China and stop its economic
development and growing influence. Therefore, Washington’s efforts in this
direction are seen as unconvincing and too late.
By many measures, China is
already the world’s leading economic power. It is clear that detractors in the
US will try to create programs that would reduce the interest of developing
countries in cooperating with Beijing, but these efforts will not succeed.