Globalisation has undoubtedly facilitated world trade, yet its effects on democracy within nations seem to be adverse.
The US has reaped significant benefits from globalisation, particularly in sales, but the country's unstable political environment prompts doubts about globalisation's overall efficacy.
If it is not working in the richest country doing the most exports, then surely it is not working for other countries - at least when considered with medium to long term objectives
Global monopolies or oligopolies have given rise to the wealthiest individuals in history, leading to an unprecedented concentration of wealth and power among a select few. Globalisation has propelled China to the forefront as the world's leading manufacturer creating a competitor to Democracy (or what we have left of it)
Despite potentially noble intentions, these billionaire figures have not been democratically elected to address social or economic issues from behind the scenes.
Public trust in politics is at an all-time low, exacerbated by numerous politicians' close ties with affluent individuals who finance their campaigns or offer bribes. It remains unclear whether this issue stems from the global economy, where power is frequently situated in fewer people. (Going backwards, like fall of the Roman empire)
The decline of primary and secondary industries in Western countries has hindered economic opportunities for individuals better suited to specific types of work.
Domestic industries have been supplanted by foreign imports, primarily from China and the US, leading to economic downturns in rural areas. This shift has resulted in a concentration of jobs in the tertiary sector (professional services) within urban locations.
Several democracies, such as the UK, have overly relied on the tertiary sector. While a weaker currency has benefited overseas manufacturing labour costs, the rise of AI and automation underscores the importance of competing across all industries because people costs will decrease.
The US is at the forefront of the IT and software manufacturing industries. The dominance of China and the US has transformed the EU into a market that predominantly purchases rather than sells. Consumers of foreign products, instead of putting their own industry first.
I think many countries in the EU are starting to see that over-globalisation is just weakening their own industry in the long term, and realise that their local producers need economic protectionism to develop industry instead of allowing it to become a foreign import.
Some trade is certainly good, but not at the expenses of not competing within an industry.
Trump has capitalised on this situation with his America First slogan, as it seems to many that the global economy is put ahead of people within that economy. (Trump is a conman and oppertunist with no plans to fix the problem).
Countries are starting to build up their armies again for the first time in decades. The world is less stable now, and being economically depdepdent on a global supply chain leaves them exposed (e.g. Energy).
The derisking from China is the starting point, but that could potentially be extended to the US. Not in the a negative way, but just to make sure that local suppliers are competing in every single area possible. The US has become more authoritarian with their monopolies and the cabal (e.g. Bill Gates) being the main shareholder in so many industries.