FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  The Indian Variant

The Indian Variant

Started by sharkbok95 REPLIES1,365 VIEWS· 20 May 2021, 14:25
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
SH
sharkbokCaptain23,201 posts
20 May 2021, 14:25
#1
20 May 2021, 14:25#1

The UK variant is estimated to be around 70% more transmissible than the original variant from China. The  Indian Variant could be more than 50% transmissible than the UK variant.

Each level of lockdown becomes less effective as the transmissibility increases. Countries that did well at the start of Covid, done worse as new variant transmissibility increased.  

So far it is believed that current vaccines are effective against the Indian variant. The UK is in a rush to vaccinate faster to prevent another wave. It does however seem mRNA vaccines are more resistant to variants than viral vector technology like AstraZeneca and Johnston & Johnston- and Sputnek 5. 

The Indian variant is expected to become the dominant strain in the UK within weeks. A good chance it will become the dominant variant in the world as more cases are discovered. 

I see the Blue Bulls have a player who had long Covid, he was out of rugby for 5 months- but is now playing again. (Probably the South African variant). 

On the positive side, more vaccine is available around the world, so this might help stop the next variant - while combating the current variants. 



ST
Stavanger1Pro4,532 posts
20 May 2021, 16:43
#2
20 May 2021, 16:43#2
With the freedom of movement between Ireland and Northern Ireland there is no way we can stop the Indian variant taking hold if it becomes dominate in the UK.
Really is race against time. Our vaccine program has picked up speed recently but we are a few weeks behind the UK, I suspect my age cohert will get its first jab next month, most likely it will be Pfizer.
Looking forward to getting back to normal.
SH
sharkbokCaptain23,201 posts
20 May 2021, 17:26
#3
20 May 2021, 17:26#3

I see Northern Ireland is ahead of the rest of the UK. They are now inviting people 25 and older to get jabs.  

The UK government is going to make a decision on vaccinating children in around 1-2 months once all adults are vaccina ted. 

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
20 May 2021, 17:35
#4
20 May 2021, 17:35#4

"Looking forward to getting back to normal."

Nothing will be the same again. This is the new normal. We'll manage it as good as we can and get used to living like we have to...the vax won't be a fix like with polio and smallpox. ..it might help for a while, and mabe we will adapt and live with like we do live with flu...but vaccine even 100% of the population won't stop it...I hope I'm wrong...we'll see soon.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
20 May 2021, 17:43
#5
20 May 2021, 17:43#5

My problem is the vaccine does not effect spreading of the virus, but help  with serious illnesses of infected people.    So whatever happens vaccination will not effect transmission at all.   

I have registered to get  the jabs but was not informed  yet when to get the jabs.    In  a way I would be happier if the vaccines prevents transmission  even by people that has been vaccinated - but experts all  over the world claim it does not and I have seen no reports to the contrary anywhere.          

SH
sharkbokCaptain23,201 posts
20 May 2021, 17:53
#6
20 May 2021, 17:53#6

Tests in the UK and US have reported around 70% reduction in transmission after vaccination. Though that might vary by the variant. 

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
20 May 2021, 19:53
#7
20 May 2021, 19:53#7

50% in South Africa, according to the government. 

SH
sharkbokCaptain23,201 posts
02 Jun 2021, 19:24
#8
02 Jun 2021, 19:24#8

Cases in the UK have gone from under 2000 per day to 4000 per day in about 10 days. That is even with 3/4 of the population vaccinated with 1 dose, and about half with a second dose. 
It is mostly younger people that are reporting infections, so it shows the vaccines work. 

Looks like the start of the third wave...

The Indian variant is going to create problems all around the world for the foreseeable future. 

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
02 Jun 2021, 19:31
#9
02 Jun 2021, 19:31#9

..so says the BBC.

SH
sharkbokCaptain23,201 posts
02 Jun 2021, 20:12
#10
02 Jun 2021, 20:12#10

@ButtPlug,

South Africa is about to go into a third wave as well. It is only a matter of time before the Indian variant takes over from the UK variant as the dominant globalist variant. 

The South African variant does not appear to be as transmissible as even the UK variant. If SA gets the Indian variant Covid will be much worse. 


MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
02 Jun 2021, 20:17
#11
02 Jun 2021, 20:17#11

Yes we have now heard the same claim for the UK variant, the SouthAfrican variant and this Indian variant. But Indian cases have dropped from 400000 a day at the peak back to 133000 cases per day. In a population of 1.4 billion!!

So far India has had 28 million cases, one case in 50 people living cheek to jowl in huge cities. If this variant is 2.5 times as transmissible as the Wuhan virus one would have expected more cases.

SH
sharkbokCaptain23,201 posts
02 Jun 2021, 20:22
#12
02 Jun 2021, 20:22#12

India's recent wave peaked and dropped because of lockdowns.
It is the only way to tackle the problem quickly, at least until herd immunity from the vaccine. 

India has also claimed all the AstraZeneca vaccine that was being produced in India - so they must be doing mass vaccinations. 

South Africa will struggle to go into a third lockdown, more so than richer countries.
70+50 = 120% increase is transmissibility, not 2.5 times. 


MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
02 Jun 2021, 20:35
#13
02 Jun 2021, 20:35#13

Your words:


The UK variant is estimated to be around 70% more transmissible than the original variant from China. The  Indian Variant could be more than 50% transmissible than the UK variant.

Basic arithmetic:

UKR=WRx1.7

IR=UKRx1.5=WRx1.7X1.5= 2.55WR

So the Indian rate according to you is 2.55 times as transmissible as the UK rate. Lefties shouldn’t  use numbers.

SH
sharkbokCaptain23,201 posts
02 Jun 2021, 20:39
#14
02 Jun 2021, 20:39#14

Those numbers are wrong. You are using 1.5, instead of 0.5, and 1.7 instead of 0.7. 

1 + 100% = 2.

1 + 50% = 1.5    (This is a 50% increase of the base transmissibility). 


DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
02 Jun 2021, 21:01
#15
02 Jun 2021, 21:01#15

Are you sh!tting us?

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
03 Jun 2021, 00:27
#16
03 Jun 2021, 00:27#16

Unfortunately he isn’t....Lefties have trouble with numbers.

SH
sharkbokCaptain23,201 posts
03 Jun 2021, 00:30
#17
03 Jun 2021, 00:30#17
If you take any number and add 100% - it doubles the original number.

So if a variant is 70% more transmissive, it is less than double the original number. 1 +70% = 1.7 
That is the law of physics chappie, an objective universal truth - not faith-based truth. 

If someone grows by 20%, they are 20% taller than their original height.Original Height + 20% = new height. If someone is 5 foot, and they grow to 6 foot- they have become 20% taller. 
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
03 Jun 2021, 03:02
#18
03 Jun 2021, 03:02#18

Precisely.....let’s assume 100 people are infected in Wuhan. If the UK variant is 70% more infectious than the Wuhan version, instead of 100 people being infected 170 people are infected.

But if they had gotten the Indian variant 50% more people would have been infected than the UK variant (your words not mine). So rather than 170 people being infected 255 would have been infected

So 2.55 times the original 100 were infected. This has nothing to do with physics, it’s primary school arithmetic. I’m not really sure what your major malfunction is, but it appears to be serious. See a doctor.

 

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
03 Jun 2021, 05:30
#19
03 Jun 2021, 05:30#19

 "That is the law of physics chappie, an objective universal truth - not faith-based truth. "

LMAO!!!

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
03 Jun 2021, 08:06
#20
03 Jun 2021, 08:06#20

My morning coffee almost came out my nose. 

VisKop, tell us again abo ut "zi science".

Plank.

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
03 Jun 2021, 08:09
#21
03 Jun 2021, 08:09#21

Thought you would like that...I wonder how he calculates mark-up?

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
03 Jun 2021, 08:32
#22
03 Jun 2021, 08:32#22

Mark-up or po p-up?

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
03 Jun 2021, 08:48
#23
03 Jun 2021, 08:48#23

 

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
03 Jun 2021, 09:04
#24
03 Jun 2021, 09:04#24

I see your math PHD and I raise you my drivel.

hahaha

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
03 Jun 2021, 09:13
#25
03 Jun 2021, 09:13#25

 

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
03 Jun 2021, 09:18
#26
03 Jun 2021, 09:18#26

Before this disappears!

"


mozart on Ruckers Forum

mozart

Hall Of Fame


33349 posts


Jun 02, 2021, 20:17


Yes we have now heard the same claim for the UK variant, the SouthAfrican variant and this Indian variant. But Indian cases have dropped from 400000 a day at the peak back to 133000 cases per day. In a population of 1.4 billion!!

So far India has had 28 million cases, one case in 50 people living cheek to jowl in huge cities. If this variant is 2.5 times as transmissible as the Wuhan virus one would have expected more cases.


 0 0 Likes

sharkbok on Ruckers Forum

sharkbok

Hall Of Fame


13377 posts


Jun 02, 2021, 20:22


India's recent wave peaked and dropped because of lockdowns.

It is the only way to tackle the problem quickly, at least until herd immunity from the vaccine. 


India has also claimed all the AstraZeneca vaccine that was being produced in India - so they must be doing mass vaccinations. 


South Africa will struggle to go into a third lockdown, more so than richer countries.

70+50 = 120% increase is transmissibility, not 2.5 times. 




 0 0 Likes

mozart on Ruckers Forum

mozart

Hall Of Fame


33349 posts


Jun 02, 2021, 20:35


Your words:




The UK variant is estimated to be around 70% more transmissible than the original variant from China. The  Indian Variant could be more than 50% transmissible than the UK variant.


Basic arithmetic:


UKR=WRx1.7


IR=UKRx1.5=WRx1.7X1.5= 2.55WR


So the Indian rate according to you is 2.55 times as transmissible as the UK rate. Lefties shouldn’t  use numbers.


 0 0 Likes

sharkbok on Ruckers Forum

sharkbok

Hall Of Fame


13377 posts


Jun 02, 2021, 20:39


Those numbers are wrong. You are using 1.5, instead of 0.5, and 1.7 instead of 0.7. 


1 + 100% = 2.


1 + 50% = 1.5    (This is a 50% increase of the base transmissibility). 




 0 0 Likes

DbDraad on Ruckers Forum

DbDraad

Hall Of Fame


14120 posts


Jun 02, 2021, 21:01


Are you sh!tting us?

  0 0 Likes

mozart on Ruckers Forum

mozart

Hall Of Fame


33349 posts


Jun 03, 2021, 00:27


Unfortunately he isn’t....Lefties have trouble with numbers.

 0 0 Likes

sharkbok on Ruckers Forum

sharkbok

Hall Of Fame


13377 posts


Jun 03, 2021, 00:30


If you take any number and add 100% - it doubles the original number.



So if a variant is 70% more transmissive, it is less than double the original number. 

1 +70% = 1.7 


That is the law of physics chappie, an objective universal truth - not faith-based truth.


If someone grows by 20%, they are 20% taller than their original height.

Original Height + 20% = new height. 

If someone is 5 foot, and they grow to 6 foot- they have become 20% taller. 

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
03 Jun 2021, 09:50
#27
03 Jun 2021, 09:50#27

This though...

"That is the law of physics "chappie", an objective universal truth - not faith-based truth."


The levels of screwery in that sentence are unprecedented and will remain hilarious until the end of time.

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
03 Jun 2021, 10:08
#28
03 Jun 2021, 10:08#28

"If someone grows by 20%, they are 20% taller than their original height.

Original Height + 20% = new height. 

If someone is 5 foot, and they grow to 6 foot- they have become 20% taller. "



SH
sharkbokCaptain23,201 posts
03 Jun 2021, 10:08
#29
03 Jun 2021, 10:08#29
I would ask for a refund for your maths degree, it seems like a waste of money. 
Although the far right is so blinded by ideology, it is pointless for them to learn maths or science. 
They will try to shape the world to fit their Arab ideology, even if that includes lying to themselves. To dishonest for science, and stuck believing in Noah's ark. That is part of being a good Fake Christian or Arab- living a lie. 

It is very simple, a 70% increase is not a + 1.7 increase, it is +0.7. 
Even Dolph "Lungerin" sic" would know that.
A 20% increase in transmissibility is + 0.2% (not 1.2) 
Just like if someone is 5 foot, if they grow by 20%  - they come 6 foot.If someone is 5 foot, if they grow by 120% they become 11 foot. 
Very simple stuff... No need for a doctrine. Honesty is something inherent in someone, it is not something that can be bought. 

SH
sharkbokCaptain23,201 posts
03 Jun 2021, 10:17
#30
03 Jun 2021, 10:17#30
Draad I have tried to make it simple so even you can understand. 

a 20% increase is + 0.2, not + 1.2 
5 Foot +20% = 6 foot (correct) 

5 Foot + 120% =  11 Foot. 
Use a calculator... Try refuting what I am saying logically, instead of being a blue-arse horse fly around Mozart. ---Buttplug is dependent on his YouTube education and world of conspiracies, so we cant expect independent thought from him. 


DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
03 Jun 2021, 10:37
#31
03 Jun 2021, 10:37#31

I would ask for a refund for your maths degree, it seems like a waste of money. 

Although the far right is so blinded by ideology, it is pointless for them to learn maths or science. 
They will try to shape the world to fit their Arab ideology, even if that includes lying to themselves. To dishonest for science, and stuck believing in Noah's ark. That is part of being a good Fake Christian or Arab- living a lie. 

It is very simple, a 70% increase is not a + 1.7 increase, it is +0.7.  (or original value x 1.7, what is 1 + 0.7? )
Even Dolph Lungerin" sic" would know that. (He's got a degree in Chemical engineering, so he probably knows that, yes)
A 20% increase in transmissibility is + 0.2% (not 1.2) (No, it is multiplied by 1.2 idiot)




Just like if someone is 5 foot, if they grow by 20%  - they come 6 foot. (I'm stumped how you managed to calculate that correctly)If someone is 5 foot, if they grow by 120% they become 11 foot. (No sh!t Sherlock)




"Draad I have tried to make it simple so even you can understand. "
...
"Use a calculator..."
Maybe you should stop using one and exercise your brain for a change.
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
03 Jun 2021, 11:29
#32
03 Jun 2021, 11:29#32

This is becoming funnier by the moment.

Now we have inserted a strawman in order to cover poor maths.

We are perhaps only a hair's breadth away from bringing in UFO's to bolster the argument.

...and it's not even Friday yet.

Please keep going $ussieVissie.

Draad, when last did you laugh out loud at a thread like you have this one?



SH
sharkbokCaptain23,201 posts
03 Jun 2021, 11:29
#33
03 Jun 2021, 11:29#33
My guess is that anyone who is not part of the far religious right would agree with the facts. 
70% increase =  +0.7
However, most of these "people" that cant understand primary school maths are also anti-vax conspiracists. so it is not as if they live in reality anyway.
If their church minister tells them that the tooth fairy exists, then so be it- it becomes reality. 
The same clowns who try to argue with scientists. They can't keep up with logic, so their only option is a conspiracy, misinformation, and disinformation. 

The same clowns who would try fix their car themselves instead of using a certified expert mechanic. 

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
03 Jun 2021, 11:33
#34
03 Jun 2021, 11:33#34

We are dealing with the same person that doesn't understand the difference between possibility and probability.

The guy actually thinks the two words mean the same thing. Cos of all zi sciencing.

Is it possible for a pop-up merchant to make sense? Yes.

Is it probable? No .

hahaha

You plank!!!!

SH
sharkbokCaptain23,201 posts
03 Jun 2021, 11:48
#35
03 Jun 2021, 11:48#35
The same ButtPlug who worked at Mcdonald's and argued at a braai with a scientist who had a doctrine. 

ButtPlug then claimed that people with doctrines are stupid, because this person was struggling to turn his patty at the braai...

The far-right fear science, because it can destroy their tooth fairy reality...
They fear the honesty and truth that science provides, and this crushes their little reality of going to heaven... For they are God's people after all, for it was they that stole the Jewish Bible, and passed it off as a Western Bible with a white God and white Jesus. 

Just like how the Boers stole the "Western" Bible and turned the Great Trek into the promised land, with black people the slaves given by God...The alt-right...


PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
03 Jun 2021, 12:09
#36
03 Jun 2021, 12:09#36

Haha and God enters the debate.

Planky, you really are a special one.

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
03 Jun 2021, 12:11
#37
03 Jun 2021, 12:11#37

"My guess is that anyone who is not part of the far right would agree with the facts. 


70% increase =  +0.7"
No, it's +(0.7 x the amount/quantity) which equates to multiplying the amount/quantity by 1.7.
Increase "A" by 70% = 1.7"A"= 1.7x"A"
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
03 Jun 2021, 12:13
#38
03 Jun 2021, 12:13#38

Plum, he's gotta be trolling...

SH
sharkbokCaptain23,201 posts
03 Jun 2021, 12:29
#39
03 Jun 2021, 12:29#39
Here are x2 calculators.
I suggest you use them, but you won't because it is created by evil scientists. 
You want to remain a child with your tooth fairy fantasies... Anything that destroys your fantasy reality is blocked.
https://www.calculatorsoup.com/calculators/algebra/percentage-increase-calculator.php?v_1=1&v_2=1.7&action=solve

----
This is another calculator. So now you have 2 calculators . 1 +1 = 2. 
https://www.omnicalculator.com/math/percentage-increase?c=GBP&v=bb:0,number:1,result:1.7


DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
03 Jun 2021, 13:02
#40
03 Jun 2021, 13:02#40

You don't need a calculator for basic arithmetic...and that seems to be the problem...

↓ LOAD MORE (page 2 of 3)

More from Mikes Gripes