No man. Try raising your own arguments in stead of just quoting memes and full articles without any of your own deliberations.
"1. Obstruction of justice. Robert Mueller’s decision not to formally charge Trump with obstruction of justice leaned heavily......................."
I would, at this stage, be careful to rely a lot on the Mueller Report in making these kind of claims.
Many folks are crying over why Trump, himself, hasn't appeared before Meuller. What has he got to hide after all, they argue?
My question is this: "Why is Meuller digging in his heels about appearing before Congress? What has he got to hide?
Could it have anything to do with the current investigations into his own team and their conduct during the investigation?
Could it have something to do with the entrapment of witnesses like George Papadopoulus?
Or maybe with the threatening of witnesses' family members?
The fact that some of their Russian/Ukrainian sources being exposed as actual CIA CIs perhaps?
Maybe the editing of voicemail messages to omit exculpatory evidence?
Could it have anything to do with the FISA abuse?
Who knows but Meuller certainly is not too eager to appear before Congress.
IMO, he would probably only be prepared to face Congress if the likes of Mark Meadows, Doug Collins, Jim Jordan, Lindsey Graham and Devin Nunes are banned from the proceedings.
As for the "Obstruction of Justice Charges"......
Have you actually read the so-called instances together with the legal comments and notes on them?
One example. The general view is that Trump allegedly told McGahn to go fire Bob Meuller. Why would he do that? First of all, McGahn could not have fired Meuller in a million years. He had no authority to do that.
Then it was spun that ".....no, no, no, he did not tell McGahn to go fire Meuller. He told him to go tell Rosenstein to fire him".
That one also did not fly because Trump actually basically told McGahn to go ask Rosenstein whether it has been taken into account that Meuller may have a conflict of interest.
Fact is that Trump, himself, could have fired Meuller on the spot. Meuller worked for the DOJ. The DOJ is a branch of the Executive. Trump is in charge of the Executive and he, in effect, hires each and every govt employee and if he can hire, he can fire. Comey, himself, admitted in Congress that: ".....I know that the President could fire me for any, or no reason at all......"
Another so-called obstruction was the fact that he fired Comey, which was actually what sparkled the appointment of a Special Council. It was well withing his right to fire Comey. See above quotation.
"Mueller’s report also noted “a President does not have immunity after he leaves office” and that part of his task was to 'preserve the evidence.' ".
Yeah right, and then they (he and his team) themselves destroyed some of the (crucial) evidence.
"2. Campaign finance violations.....
.....'Cohen himself has now admitted,' it said, 'with respect to both payments, he acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1.'.....".
Cohen, who is now in jail for lying.
Cohen who, despite being warned about lying to Congress (again) before he started his charade in front of Congress, went ahead and did just that.
He lied another eight times in that hearing. Funny enough, months after this happened Elijah Cummings, who was the chairman of the committee hearing and who personally issued the above warning to Cohen, hasn't lifted a finger about it, despite numerous reminders to this effect by Republican representatives.
Yeah right. Let's rely on Honest Cohen's testimony.
"3. Inauguration overcharges.
....We don’t know if Trump himself directed the scheme, and if he did, we don’t know that proof exists. But if so, this would amount to a pretty obvious crime. ...."
I don't know about you but that looks a lot like conjecture to me.
"4. New York tax fraud. Last fall, the New York Times obtained detailed financial records showing that Trump and his father spent years committing what the paper called outright tax fraud — i.e., a crime. Though the alleged crimes uncovered by the Times occurred too long ago to be prosecuted today, the New York State attorney general is investigating Trump’s finances."
Trump has, like every big business man in the US been under IRS scrutiny for years.
"Trump Foundation fraud"
From the New York Times:
"The investigation of the foundation was begun by the former attorney general, Eric T. Schneiderman, a Democrat who was an antagonist of Mr. Trump before stepping down following revelations of sexual misconduct this year."
From the same article:
"Next month, the ongoing case will fall to the incoming attorney general, Letitia James, a vocal critic of Mr. Trump who said recently that she would 'use every area of the law to investigate President Trump and his business transactions and that of his family.' "