X.com to be banned in the UK? (Maybe Canada and Australia as well)

Ummm . . . have you actually read the Mueller report (even after it was heavily redacted by the Trump administration)?

Here's an excerpt:

"The Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion. Evidence of Russian government operations began to surface in mid-2016. In June, the Democratic National Committee and its cyber response team publicly announced that Russian hackers had compromised its computer network. Releases of hacked materials—hacks that public reporting soon attributed to the Russian government—began that same month. Additional releases followed in July through the organization WikiLeaks, with further releases in October and November. In late July 2016, soon after WikiLeaks’s first release of stolen documents, a foreign government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump Campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos had suggested to a representative of that foreign government that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. That information prompted the FBI on July 31, 2016, to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump Campaign were coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities."

So basically, there was interference from Russia, the Trump campaign knew about the interference but because it favoured Bozo, they welcomed it.

Those are the facts.

Just because so many Republicans lied or evaded questions or simply didn't answer those questions that Mueller couldn't prove collusion by the Trump campaign doesn't mean they weren't in on the whole thing. They certainly knew it was happening and they allowed it to happen (remember the facts!). You'd have to be stupid even by Trumpanzee standards to think that the Mueller report exonerated Bozo.

You're full of Sh!t Rudenek. They looked for a crime, accused him of a crime and after throwing everything they couldn't proof anything...Adam Schiff lied. He said he have seen proof of collusion and he couldn't proof it. Barack Obama and his intelligence agencies spied on a president elect and his transition team and used a concocted dossier to justify it. They hijacked Trump's first term with this nonsense. Deliberate obstruction of a POTUS.

Draad, just stick to the specific facts you'd like to dispute and we can take it from there.

Nah, I'm good.

Since you not stick with proven facts - then how dare you ask Draad to stick with BS that was since disproved by 2 Special Council Investigations and the report of the Inspectoir General of Justice.

Since then documents released earlier this tear by the CIA showed it was a scheme concocted by the Democrats first as an election strategy and then as a plot to destabilze the Trump's Presidency.

What is really funny you quote from the Mueller report that could not find any evidence of Collussion between the Russians and the Trump Election campaign - but base some fo the issues on propaganda BS. So what about the alleged hacking of the DNC computer/, It was never proven of having happened, It was just another lie. What the DNC claimed was hacked was in fact media reports on opinion polls, The DNC never asked the FBI to investigate the alleged hacking - they used a Ukraine based firm to investgate it and was a concocted lie. By the way it now came put the Ukraine firm allegedly used to invest th ahcking - was in fact an FBI operation based in Kiev.

When Mueller was confronted on the sisue as to why he did not investigate the source where the Hoax orginated from - he said it was not part of his responsibilities. Barr then appointed Huxham as Special Council to investigate how the BS started, He lald three court case charges against individuals invovled and when ti becme clear that the source of the allegations orginiated from the Obama Administration using the CIA and FBI for implmentation he wthdrew the charges.

In a report dated 7 December 2016 the CIA experts found that there was no evidence of any collusion between Trump and Russia - and was ready to publish it on 8 December 2016. Obama called a meeting attended by Clinton and Biden on 8 December 2016 where it was decided not to publish the CIA report and a scheme was concocted to sabotage the Trump adminsitration using the Russian Hoax based on BS they concocted themselves.

Obama and Biden was criminally involved in the process and the Justice Department is now investigation charges involving Obama himself. Trump said Obama should not be charged despite the fact he was an alleged criminal. Trump said he does not want to see a .precedent esablished in the USA. The fact si that the USA people has since realized that the Demcorats are a party based on High Treason and undermining of the country through corruption and maladministration.

,

.

Rooi makes an appearance because he was one of those caught up by the massive misinformation campaign.

The uneducated allways springback to freedom of speech.

All freedoms have limits, which are basically to protect the freedoms of others.

If someone robs a bank and speaks during the time, is that just their right to express their freedom of speech?

Yes, the law already provides for all of that.

What's your point?

"The uneducated allways springback to freedom of speech.

All freedoms have limits, which are basically to protect the freedoms of others.

If someone robs a bank and speaks during the time, is that just their right to express their freedom of speech?"

The irony is so astounding, I don't actually know where to start with this.

"Rooi makes an appearance because he was one of those caught up by the massive misinformation campaign."

ButtPlug slinks away from the actual facts presented . . . and rather sticks to the narrative he heard on Fox News or read on Breitbart.

Lol there are no facts that we haven't been over on here countless times before, RooiTit.

Just to be clear, are you denying that there was a plethora of misinformation involved and that it was spread far, wide and en masse.

Lol..."facts"....straw man horse manure...selling the same horse sh!T as 9 years ago...

Rooinek

I do nt waqatnch FoxNews and smetimeds see articles on their website, My main nfo I get from, S enate and House Hearing rerocfddin gs - normally available on the internet.

I also stidy he docuentation made recently beong unclassified and that is where it vbecae clear that the so-called Russan Hoax were based enirely on lies concocted by the Dmmpcrats and by the Obama Admibnistration.

I never read breitbart - but often atch BB Dabd Sky News since it is available on DSTV, The one chabbell Inever watc h a fer 2008 was CNN, When theycame out initially I watched them virtually full time - but over the ast 15 years whenever they come up with a honest report and not lying it was by accident and not intentional at all. S ame with MSNBCm NBC and ABC.

Allow me to explain - at their prome theio viewership wa 3,9 million people - a fte years of BS instead of nws the now have a viewership of 950 000. Reason what they use as propaganda was recognized as such and thy lost viewrs massively, A nexample of the situation is - in one case of ying a gentleman took them to court t claim $100 million ibn damages, The Jury fond CNN guity of libeel. After studting the financial records of CNN in an open court th Judge said that he would prefer a lower settlment since a fine of $100 million will lead to bankryutsy of CNN. After discussins and desperate please by CNN the punishment was reduced to te following:

1. RThat at the start of each hourly news report CNN would apologize to t he claimant and admit their report was a lie, That was to be done for three days running.
2. CNN will pay the claimant $5 million nd cove all his legal costs realting to the case,

I quote this case to ilustrate who the real liars in the emdia set-up is, So maybe you should take more cae about media B S and check what really the situation is when ou get reports from news media,

,

SB

The uneducated allways springback to freedom of speech.

All freedoms have limits, which are basically to protect the freedoms of others.

TRue - but what is not freedm of speech is lying abour issues, When in G emany the AfD isa ccused of being nazi's and people claim it isa lie - the reaction remans unchanged to protect thor own political interests,

Wish the media bear your simary in mind, onme wnders whether all the lies spread by the media is really not abuse of reedom of speech,

SB

The uneducated allways springback to freedom of speech.

All freedoms have limits, which are basically to protect the freedoms of others.

TRue - but what is not freedm of speech is lying abour issues, When in G emany the AfD isa ccused of being nazi's and people claim it isa lie - the reaction remans unchanged to protect thor own political interests,

Wish the media bear your simary in mind, onme wnders whether all the lies spread by the media is really not abuse of reedom of speech,

SB

The uneducated allways springback to freedom of speech.

All freedoms have limits, which are basically to protect the freedoms of others.

TRue - but what is not freedm of speech is lying abour issues, When in G emany the AfD isa ccused of being nazi's and people claim it isa lie - the reaction remans unchanged to protect thor own political interests,

Wish the media bear your simary in mind, onme wnders whether all the lies spread by the media is really not abuse of reedom of speech,

Ou Maaik, you say "allow me to explain" and then you proceed to hammer away at your keyboard as if you're wearing boxing gloves and you don't explain anything. Just the usual lack of respect for anyone bothering to even try read your pitiful nonsense . . . and then you go triplicate again.

Are you sure you've had your meds today?

Maaik, jy mors jou asem.

Ou Maaik, you say "allow me to explain" and then you proceed to hammer away at your keybeard

waaaaaaahahaha…...OU Rooibeard your deterioration since retirement is is precipitous,