FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  A crucial scrum...

A crucial scrum...

Started by Denny5 REPLIES820 VIEWS· 20 Jul 2015, 12:47
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
20 Jul 2015, 12:47
#1
20 Jul 2015, 12:47#1

in the Bok red zone and the front row is replaced. A crucial throw last year and Strauss replaces Bismarck....both scrum and lineout went awry.


Why? In hindsight we know the timing wa s wrong.


Is it because Meyer has absolute faith in his bench or is it an act of madness?..... or is it an act of stupidity?


I just don't get it.


I think it's fair to say that to make a change at a critical part of the game puts a lot of pressure on the bench player.


Isn't it wise to wait until the pressure is relaxed before making a change? And even if Meyer has absolute faith in his bench there is still the human element of making a mistake which cannot be ignored.


The practice of substitution has a lot to do with timing.


Anyone remember that chip and charge individual brilliance by Ricky Januarie in the Dunedin Test? Nothing illustrates the importance of timing better listening to Jake White saying he was just about to replace Ricky when that bit of unbelievable magic won us the test.


Meyer's timing is tragic.

DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
20 Jul 2015, 13:19
#2
20 Jul 2015, 13:19#2
 Meyer is clearly trying these bench options out. We learnee much from it, more so than had we fielded them late in the gamewith the result wrapped up. But we must not neglect to mention Australias change oif tactics for the second half.
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
20 Jul 2015, 13:26
#3
20 Jul 2015, 13:26#3
You mean the change of tempo which happened after Quade Cooper was replaced while at same time the Boks rung the changes in their scrum. 
PA
PakieCaptain17,321 posts
20 Jul 2015, 13:53
#4
20 Jul 2015, 13:53#4
It's sad that losing in test rugby seems to have become okay in the name of learning and experimenting. We made massive tactical blunders that cost us a test match. That's not okay. Any idiot of a coach can make willy nilly substitutions to "experiment". Meyer's job is to help his players win test matches through sound tactical and strategic management.
DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
20 Jul 2015, 14:00
#5
20 Jul 2015, 14:00#5
 I didn't say it was okay, in fact, I forewarned that our bench was weak. I was called an effing idiot for saying that, how it's all changed! But unfortunately, our rugby is so rife with mythos that we do have to experiment at test level. Now we know without doubt Malherbe, Reinach and Damian for instance are definitely not test quality.
PA
PakieCaptain17,321 posts
20 Jul 2015, 14:03
#6
20 Jul 2015, 14:03#6
Yep, not referring to you as such. But there's a definite vibe to that effect going around, especially coming from the coach himself.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news