FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Are the wee abs real title contenders for the world cup

Are the wee abs real title contenders for the world cup

Started by Beeno142 REPLIES489 VIEWS· 17 Jun 2014, 13:16
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
19 Jun 2014, 16:00
#41
19 Jun 2014, 16:00#41

Why would I be fixated with du Plessis at lock you stupid prick when he has played most of his rugby there?

 

At 2.01m and 120kg its pretty obvious he is best suited to lock.....the Bulls play him at 7 because they lack quality loosies........and you call me stupid - geez Dutchie you are such easy pickings.

 

You are toooooo fucking stupid to counter my takes hence your childish pathetic response - you Dutchmen are so fucking stupid

 

 

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
19 Jun 2014, 16:28
#42
19 Jun 2014, 16:28#42
 There is a good reason why he is played at flank, but why would you understand?
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
19 Jun 2014, 17:56
#43
19 Jun 2014, 17:56#43
 beeno: Clearly as  RAW stats don't exist in the ESPN stats database the word must be the result of some mental association - perhaps your desire for raw fish (Moz, don't mention Sasuke San). More likely a thick juicy steak.
The other phrase (which is also not in the ESPN stats) is We would have... As in we would have won if...., (WWHA) is the acronym. Sounds like more moaning to me
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news