AUS vs RSA: Damian Analysis (RC '15; Round 1)

All of us has seen that game repeatedly and all of us has seen what lies you have given in what you stated was what happened on the field of play.  So what is this thread all   about? 

All of us has seen that game repeatedly and all of us has seen what lies you have given in what you stated was what happened on the field of play.  So what is this thread all   about? 

The thread is the video. 

 A link to my match summary: http://www.ruckersforum.com/forum.cfm?threadid=14625#inscore_ifheight_xdc_500

 Disaster
Yiu ran away like the coward you really are when I proved that your match  description were deceptive and often enough outright lies.   The two Village idiots who are  repeatedly eating crow insofar as De Allende is concerned are you and Mozart.     

Actually, I posted on that very thread. I told you the video would be coming soon and that you would have to stand by your words under the closest of scrutiny! What more needed to be said? In light of this video, and my summary... your thread is redundant.

But, if you are so confident I am wrong. Go through the video, you wouldn't want to be a coward would you? You have accused me of cowardice in your new ploy, yet here I am on attack and you are doing your damnedest to avoid me, LOL!!! Another lie? Or are you confused? Whatever narrative makes you feel better I suppose

 What's wrong Tokkie-lossie? Fox got your tongue? LMAO!!!

 

 Well, for a time the big mouths went quiet, now they start bleating on other threads. Something about a video that frightens the poor dears away. You were saying something about being stupid UncleanCu*t? Well, here is the footage so you should have no trouble proving your point. Don't fret little one, video 2 is on its way.

Disaster 
I suppose everyone went quiet - one can only take idiocy up to a point and then it loses its funnyness.  Your constant repetition of the same BS is having the expected effect - we are all tired of your idiocy. You are a waste of space on this site, oxygen thief.    

 The coward and liar. The blow-hards are put on the spot and bereft of words. Best not speak of idiocy though, even your pal Denny called out as a plank embarrassing yourself.  Best you curl up in your rocking chair and fade into obscurity as the worn out relic you are.

 "All of us has seen that game repeatedly and all of us has seen what lies you have given in what you stated was what happened on the field of play."

It is actually very easy. All you have to do is point out the timestamps where DF is lying and explain why exactly he is lying. Come on Ou Ballie. The floor is yours.

 Ceradunce 
It was done point per point and it did not make nice reading - since there was so many lies and so much misrepresentation in Disaster's descriptions.   The idiot then ran for cover and now started a new thread on the same issue - hoping that members would have forgotten his previous BS.   No wonder the rest of the members ignored the thread and I tried to worn the idiot off - but then his brother in arms and fellow idiot came along and try to help him out.       

 Where was it done? Which thread? You are the f'king moron making a habit of calling everyone who you do not agree with idiots, morons, dolts, etc. You are the one calling everyone who you do not agree with liars while this forum is littered with your own lies and other examples of hypocrisy. It is time you remove the log from your own eye before looking for splinters in the eyes of others.

 Ask your fellow-idiot - it was a thread he started and I quoted his comments and pointed out the points where he misrepresented situations or lied outright.  

 Mozart
What you asked for was done and was clarified 100%.  Why did you avoid commenting on the outcome.   Disaster ran for cover by avoiding commenting on it and now come back with another batch of BS on a new thread.  .  This item was covered in detail previously and returning to it without dealing with the comments I  made iro last thread is cowardice and dishonesty - something the three of you have in abundance. 
I pointed the issue out to Disaster and he then started going ga-ga.   No wonder the other two - you and ceradunce - tried to come to his rescue.   Birds of a feather flock together and in this case it was evident.    

Actually, I commented on that thread as I already stated. Anyway, the video is there and it lines up with my summary which by default renders yours a fallacy.

 The Kudriani try was Flo's tackle to make.  DdA,  coming from the side,  never had a chance.  You lot are so hell bent on proving DdA's shortcomings,  you lose perspective.  WTF,  why don't you start supporting NZ? 

Damian was ahead of Louw and should have stopped him. A 12 needs head-o n stopping power, Damian does not have the upper body strength to do that. Once Kuridrani got behind him in the tackle it was over. It's much like Serfontein who got run over in our 22 against Wales for a try. They are both too weak to impose themselves at 12. 

 Look idiot - you are talking too weak and then ignore the fact that everyone else say he is extremely strong in ball carries with amazing upper body strength.   You think that Fransie is bodily stronger than De Allende, but he landed on his backside twice when he tried to tackle De Allende.  Fat Fransie stronger than De Allende - what a joke.
Draad is perfectly correct on his assessment of that Kuridrani try - I have said that you are talking BS and you continued with your lies on that one.  Are you not ashamed in being caught out continuously abusing the truth.   You really are following the famous norm:-
The truth is precious - it is to be used rarely.
In your case it is not rarely - but never.  

 If DdA went for K,  and K passed to the left,  it was a try in any event.  It was his responsibility to guard the pass.  How is Flo blame free? IMO,  that was his tackle. 

 Draad
Don't expect any sense from the senseless disaster.  

Furthermore your bleating has brought an avalanche of egg upon thee! Your credibility is shot. Hiding behind snide comments only makes you look more like a weasel.

 OK... 

Well, Michael, this has all been rather flaccid. Such chest beating, so much vitriol thrown my way, but one little video and the house of cards comes hurtling to the ground. It would amuse me more were it not so routine. I knew you would offer no retort. 

 BS

LMAO!

So my summaries are always a pile of lies? How about you put your money where your mouth is? You might win back some respect.

 OK
I took your comments and watched the game myself.  I then compared what you wrote with what actually happened and found that virtually everything was misrepresented by you - in some cases it was outright lies.
I posted your comments and what really happened on this site - but you were too big a coward to respond to that and ran off like a coward.  
Just take one example you said De Allende missed a tackle.  The commentator said it was a good tackle and it was indeed a good tackle.  That was not even misrepresentation - it was an outright lie.  
So find the thread where the issue was discussed - your comments quoted and what really happened reflected in my comments.  This is nothing new - you even criticized De Allende for performance in a game that never took place - and when it was pointed out to you - you changed the name of the opposing team.  You then added another lie - you denied what happened and also that you subsequently altered the message you originally submitted.  Honesty is not your strong suit.    

I invited you to post your summary on my thread. You refused. End of discussion. Your thread is irrelevant, which waste of time. Worthless. Debunked. Over an done with. Move on before you embarrass yourself even more. 

 This is rich - you cannot find the thread where you were exposed as a liar.  Why am I not surprised about that.  

You aren't surprised about it because I asked you nearly a week ago to repost your summary here. I don't even remember the thread title. Just save us all the trouble by posting it in here and we can deal with it. Why the hold up? If it's so. Important or you, so relevant to ti's discussion, post it here. It's of no consequence to me. Your thread is irrelevant. Once the video is posted, your thread became a waste of time and worthless. 

Disaster
The comments were posted and your lies exposed.   You ran away from it like a coward you are.  So if you want it find it.  I do not specialize in finding threads - ask your fellow-idiot Ceradunce for it - he will find it.  I am sure it as posted on either  21 July 2015  or 22 July 2015.
  

Whose running where? I don't need your thread, I have he video and the accompanying summary. Your thread is irrelevant. 

 Disaster
I never went back to find past threads - that is the forte of Seuntjies and Ceradunce - so I did nothing of the kind in your case.  What yu comes up is so ridiculous that it becomes boring in the end - so is the so-called eggs.
As Seuntjies or Ceradunce to find that thread for you and then go and hide in shame for being caught out as a liar.    

Boring, I know the feeling very well. Have it your way, I may not have attained your whimsical delusions but I did successfully pinned the tail on the Tokkie! Wear it with pride, but don't hide it away between your legs.