FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Average ages of starters....a lesson for lemmings

Average ages of starters....a lesson for lemmings

Started by Mozart49 REPLIES886 VIEWS· 23 Sept 2015, 05:40
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
25 Sept 2015, 05:48
#41
25 Sept 2015, 05:48#41
 Mozart
Can you not understand anything at all?   Let me explain one thing in very easy detail.   When it comes to rugby - age is not a factor at all.   You get the  situation that older players can still perform and younger players can fail to perform.   That is plain and can you understand now that I repeatedly said age is not a factor - that performance is.
So lets look at the situation insofar as Meyer's selections and your support is concerned insofar as the match last Saturday is concerned - an exact replica of what happened over the last year in rugby:-
*   Matfield - absolutely useless as a lock in Tight 5 play - physically to weak to compete. On Saturday stood around in the backline and made tackles - nothing else *   De Villiers  - Very good in 2013 - bog ordinary in 2014 - very poor since his return after his horror injury*   Pienaar - has not done anything of value in scrummie play for three years - very slow service at best - a typical robotic player*   Kirchner - always clueless what to do when a ball coming his way - always was and always will be*   Habana -  frankly this once great player does preciously little in games nowadays and Saturday was a typical example  *   Mvovo  -  was  he actually playing?*   Louw    -  was he actually playing?*   Jannie   - played for 15 minutes and then became an embarrassment *   Beast    - played for 15 minutes and then became an embarrassment *   Bismarck - gave away four crucial penalties on Saturday - for the rest he did not do anything substantial.
Burger tried his heart out - but did not really succeed in doing anything bar spilling balls and destroying two perfectly good try-scoring opportunities.   However, credit should be given for effort.   
Problem is that in the case of most players - other than perhaps Habana and Burger - the performance of players in tests and Super 15 over the past year  was in par as to what they achieved on Saturday - so why should they actually be in the team at all?
You still don't get it - Hansen select players based on PERFORMANCE irrespective of age - Meyer select players based on REPUTATION with no regard to PERFORMANCE. 
 
 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
25 Sept 2015, 12:08
#42
25 Sept 2015, 12:08#42

Moffie why not try catch a fucking wake up for once......did I not say that of the original side selected, which contained Alberts huh, or do you want me to point that out for you to old timer?


Suddenly you want old age to be 32 and above.......fuck you......my call is 30.....so it stands


I'll say it one more time, the AB side selected to play the Argies contained 8 players under the age of 30. The ORIGINAL Bok side selected to play Japan contained only 4 players under that age of 30......that half that of the AB's.


This is the very reason all and sundry bar your ignorant self pointed out the fact that the Bok side contained too many old players - this is a FACT you stupid dunce


But keep making a complete TWAT of yourself backing the loser that is Meyer......what really tickles is that you are too stupid to comprehend how pathetic it makes you look.  

GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
25 Sept 2015, 14:42
#43
25 Sept 2015, 14:42#43
 

 

The cowardly vitriol directed at these great players tells me a lot about South African rugby fans. It's frankly disgusting.


Hey...Matfield and JDV should definitely NOT be there...nobodys directing vitriol at these (once great but not any more) players...they  simply spent, finished...pugela...mdala.


What about the unjustified comments by  the anti Lambie and De Allende clones...???


Is this just another case of the pot and kettle...



DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
25 Sept 2015, 15:15
#44
25 Sept 2015, 15:15#44
 Netso Basjan! I'd rather lose against Oz in Oz in the death of the match than lose against Japan on a neutral field. Damian and Kriel get blamed for losing matches because of their defence at the end resulting in tries. True in some respect. Why the silence about what the rest of the team did leading up to that point? Why hammer on one incident and not about the 12 penalties at the break down, the actual real reason why we lost, and guess who were the culprits? Jip, it was the vets!
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
25 Sept 2015, 15:29
#45
25 Sept 2015, 15:29#45

What is really sad is that Jean and Matfield have tarnished their reputations and will always be remembered for the washed up has beens they ended as and who contributed in a large way to the pathetic performances by the Boks under Meyer.


Unlike Bakkies, Fourie and co who retired gracefully, these clowns have dragged our rugby down to an all time low and don't have the ability to rectify the situation as they are no longer close to being good enough to make a positive impression at the highest level


Very sad really  

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
25 Sept 2015, 15:29
#46
25 Sept 2015, 15:29#46
Who gives a damn about your call Vetsak...you couldn't order a new paper clip for the office without permission. Our squad and our starting team is similar to the ABs in age. You can cut it any way you want, but 32 is a better definition of an old player than 30, given how many players at the WC have hit 30. And on that basis we are a younger team.
The fact is we only have one outlier Matfield....take him out and we are almost a year younger than NZ. 
Draad nobody is saying Allende or Kriel are solely responsible....or even most responsible. We are saying at the death if they make their tackles we might have won...and because they never made their tackles we surely lost. As D'Arcy pointed out.
Thanks for the the apology  above, I was bit over the top, think no more of it.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
25 Sept 2015, 15:35
#47
25 Sept 2015, 15:35#47

Ah Moffie the old prick is still struggling with NZ having EIGHT players under the age of 30 versus the original Bok side selected having only FOUR


You spot the difference between EIGHT and FOUR coffin dodger?


Stuff average age, deal in actual ages 

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
25 Sept 2015, 22:38
#48
25 Sept 2015, 22:38#48
 Spot the difference between 5 over 32 and 2 over 32. The ABs are as old as the Boks and they are the best team in the world, case closed.
DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
25 Sept 2015, 23:54
#49
25 Sept 2015, 23:54#49
Draad, I simply tell it how it is. I don't look for scapegoats, I look for the truth. Aainst Australia Damian was beaten all day. Opponents are looking at his channel as the access point to the try line, and by and large it has worked all year long. Same thing with Lambie, it is a well that you can generate momentum through his channel and he buckles everytime. 
As per age? Name one team of youngsters that has made a serious challenge for the World Cup. 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Sept 2015, 02:40
#50
26 Sept 2015, 02:40#50
 The constant Damien lie and not realising that age should never be  a factor - and that age should not be separated from performance.  If players - irrespective of age - still perform - age is not a factor.
Too often we have duds in the team that cost us dearly and those duds unfortunately are all past their sell-by date.  
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news