Board poll on the Clevermike/Mozart censorship

Early today Clevermike offerered to not post on strings Vlag, Pakie and I start. That wont solve the problem because Tokkie will simply transfer his viscious Chihuahua routine to threads started by others where I happen to post. . So my suggestion is a further constraint, no posting by Tokkie or by me on strings where the other one posts first. That would reduce Mike to sniping at me on his own threads, but remove his direct attacks on every post I make.....thus making it not necessary for me to respond. . So who votes in favour of the no sharing strings rule.....where the appearance of one of the grumpy old men first on the string locks out the other.

 It's sad it's come to this....you're both good posters, who evidently know your rugby albeit differ on how and who the boks should play 

I'm a no change sort of guy on this as on prior Mozart polls we voted for "freedom". So have at it guys, let freedom reign.

Not for me to say....I recuse myself. The poll simply clarifies things, but perhaps I need to admit a third option to accomodate you JW. . 1 Darwins rules....the survival of the fittest. .. 2 A Cosmetic rule that wont stop disputes.....Tokkie and I can't post on threads started by the other. . 3 A real constraint, once one of us has posted on a thread, the other doesn't participate on that thread. . I will scrupulously execute the Board's decision.....register your view.

 I'm with JW as I just ignore any threads with you two having a retarded pissing contest .Feel free to post as I have this amazing ability to not read your posts and just skip over them if I want

It seems to me that Mozart provokes CleverMike with stinging insults that cut him to the core & then CleverMike launches into multi thread attacks. All Mozart has to do is add a little fuel to the fire once in a while & in between claim innocence. 

 Moz, if the spats with mike bothers you that much, ignore him flat.

On the contrary, the spats with Mike bother the Board, so much so poor CC has left us....so Mike offered option 2 this morning. My point is option 2 wont work, if the Board wants to stop all these spats it's option 3.

 I'm in favour of this option . . . and any other option that potentially limits Moffie's childish and spiteful output.
At least the pompous old fool has finally recognized he's been getting his fat old arse kicked by Ou Maaik which is why he's trying so hard to beat a retreat without losing face with his Servile Gimps.
Wehe!

 Only someone who had his "arse kicked" by Maaik, might think it possible that someone might get his "arse kicked" by Maaik...

 
None of the above, Mozart.

Having interesting threads ruined by you two has become the order of the day.

That's how it is. One interesting subject ... followed by another ... and another ... spoilt by two adult men determined to get the last word in.

That doesn't entertain me. It irritates me ... and so I lose interest in the topic ... and the thread ... and all that's usually available to chat about is ... cricket ... on a rugby site ... which inevitably is also spoilt a few posts later.

So what motivates one to stay? You tell me?

"Hardening up" isn't the issue. Ignoring your rantings is a little difficult when every thread is dominated by it. 30 posts later and they're all between you two.

The only solution in my opinion is that I post less and less on this site. That I visit from time to time whilst looking elsewhere for rugby matter.

I'm sure that will please you ... so you two are free to go at it all you want.

 
Oh and Redneck ... thank you for encouraging me to stay. I appreciate it.

You too Mike.

So please don't go
Don't go
Don't go away
Please don't go
Don't go
I'm begging you to stay
Hey, hey, hey
I need your love
I'm down on my knees
Beggin' please, please, please
Don't go
Don't you hear me ?
Don't leave me now
Oh, no, no, no, no
Please don't go
I want you to know
That I, I, I love you so

 
Sorry Dense ... I don't putt from the rough.

You'll have to look elsewhere for your jollies.

CC i hear you are into danes.

Here's one of ours. He's ten months. Beast huh!

 Umm  i added a picture to that last post but it did stay :/

Ok, how does one add pictures to threads? Clear drag & drop doesn't work.

 
You have a Great Dane?

What made you select that breed?

King of dogs, Plum ... you won't reget your choice.

Their skeletal structure takes a pounding because of their rapid growth so please feed him top of the line food. I know it's expensive but it's worth every cent.

Get that pic on this site already.

Hows the non smoking going?

 

 
Come now, Plum ... where's the friggin pic???

Why can they not just have an attach pic option.

Had to sign up to Imgur for this.

Anyway, here it is..

I uploaded to Imgur, got the url, pasted it into the attach URL, and still nothing.

Help, anyone?

 
A simple copy and paste that used to work no longer does.

Annoying.

Think it might be because imgur is password protected? Try uploading to tinypic.com and then link to that.

Can't spend more time on this for now. Will get those images uploaded once i figure out how to use this nutty url system that doesn't accept URLs.

 Ok, thanks Rooi, will try that quickly. Anything is better than work

Also, when you paste the link, check that you don't have the "http" prefix twice.

Did that Rooi, but still get the same broken image box.

Maybe there should be a spam vote - in a similar way to how a new spam poster can be down downvoted. 
If/when a thread is hijacked by the Mozart/Clevermike Axis, 3 down votes by other posters would lock their ability to post on that specific thread. 
That would limit the destruction of other threads, while still allowing them to post/ruin each other's threads. They could have unlimited comments on each others threads.,

 OK that is a very clever Dane.. . Those small dogs have a tendency to get stuck in the throat of the big dogs. (LOL) 

  I'm in favour of this option . . . and any other option that potentially limits Moffie's childish and spiteful output.
At least the pompous old fool has finally recognized he's been getting his fat old arse kicked by Ou Maaik which is why he's trying so hard to beat a retreat without losing face with his Servile Gimps.
Wehe!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA THIS POST ILLUSTRATES HOW VERY IMMATURE OU ROOITWIT IS.YOU CANT MAKE THIS STUFF UP!ROOITWIT ALL I ASK IS THAT YOU DON'T GET SO BAD AS TO MAKE DENSE DENISE LOOK GOOD!

 
Well ... that Chihuahua was on edge ... it was a wise move to avoid it.

 

 Seems like the Dane takes after you.......big in size, loud of mouth.

 
Yeah ... and he's brave, gentle of heart, loyal, great around kids, a traffic stopper and simply beautiful.

Just like me.

but confronted by a Chihuahua he shytes himself....man you're a tonic.

Has he got carbuncles just like you?

Well the winner of this poll appears to be the Chihuahua. Nobody has exercised their constitutional rights....I guess it remains buyer's choice. Don't blame me, I proposed the only solution to Tokkie, now the polls are closed.

Yes, but is it a "viscious" (sic) chihuahua?
Wehe!