FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Bok centre stats vs Oz and NZ

Bok centre stats vs Oz and NZ

Started by Saffolk 8 REPLIES229 VIEWS· 04 Oct 2015, 21:58
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
04 Oct 2015, 21:58
#1
04 Oct 2015, 21:58#1
More bullshit from the clueless brigade
Apparently these dimwits had Kurindrani and Giteau dominating de Allende and Kriel
Yeah fucking right
The stats say:
At 12....de Allende ran the ball 9 times, gained 49m, made 2 clean breaks and beat 3 defenders.
Giteau ran the ball 8 times, gained 35m made 1 clean break and beat 2 defenders
de Allende hands down
At 13....Kriel ran the ball 9 times, gained 81m made 1 clean break and beat 6 defenders
Kurandrani ran 19 times, gained 74m, made no clean breaks and beat 4 defenders
Kriel walked it, not even close.
The stats against the Kiwi's is even more impressive
de Allende 11 runs, 46m, 2 clean breaks, 6 defenders beaten
Nonu 4 runs, 17m, 0 clean breaks, 2 defenders beaten
Kriel 11 runs, 76m, 2 clean breaks, 3 defenders beaten
Smith 6 runs, 18m, 0 clean breaks, 0 defenders beaten
You bunch of idiots and liars at that
PA
PakieCaptain17,321 posts
04 Oct 2015, 22:48
#2
04 Oct 2015, 22:48#2
Do the stats show De Allende stupidly letting himself be drawn by Quade Cooper (who was already marked by Kriel) to open the hole for Ashley-Cooper's try? Thought not. 7 points Australia. Do the stats show Kuridrani targeting De Allende close to the line, breaking his tackle and scoring the winning try? 14 points Australia.
But hey, he made 49 meters. Groovy. Best center in the world for sure.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
04 Oct 2015, 23:00
#3
04 Oct 2015, 23:00#3
Ah what bullshit.....Kurandrani did not target DA...DA was covering the inside had to try adjust and was not in a position to effect the tackle.
Bullshit DA would have been drawn by Cooper because at the time he would have concluded he needed to take Cooper out. Because you saw Kriel covering Cooper on TV does not mean a player does the same in the heat of the battle.
What the stats do tell me is that DA was better than Giteau and Kriel was far better than Kurandrani.
This is backed up by my take on the game and the media hype surrounding DA and Kriel following that game and the game against the Kiwi's. 


PA
PakieCaptain17,321 posts
04 Oct 2015, 23:03
#4
04 Oct 2015, 23:03#4
By the way, I agree that they outplayed their NZ counterparts in that test, and that was the one test where I thought Damian looked the business. 
DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
05 Oct 2015, 00:16
#5
05 Oct 2015, 00:16#5
Too bad the bulk of his metres were run down the touchline uncontested against Australia. Damian sadly sparked nothing in the RC and against Argentina we saw nothing of this supposed power as he was swallowed up by the big bad Pumas. Same against Scotland, he was stopped in his tracks in the second half when the Scots turned up the intensity and was weak in defence. Had a chance to set Habana free off a scrum set play but couldn't draw and pass. Simple stuff that the best centre in rugby should understand. I mean, he is playing better than Sonny Bill afterall! 
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
05 Oct 2015, 00:23
#6
05 Oct 2015, 00:23#6
 Kurandrani better than BOD bwhaaahaaaaa 
3K
3ku1Pro2,580 posts
05 Oct 2015, 02:16
#7
05 Oct 2015, 02:16#7
 Sonny Bill is in far better form then De Allende who is looking good himself. But SBW has been one of the best players of the wc so far.
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,281 posts
05 Oct 2015, 02:19
#8
05 Oct 2015, 02:19#8
yes Sunny Bill is playing well. Delande had a good test vs the All Blacks but has not produced his SuperXV form at test level consistently yet
DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
05 Oct 2015, 02:49
#9
05 Oct 2015, 02:49#9
 Damian is the new Lambie. Another myth. 
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news