FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Burger not the ineffective forward runner last Saturday.

Burger not the ineffective forward runner last Saturday.

Started by Mozart5 REPLIES349 VIEWS· 22 Oct 2015, 23:34
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
22 Oct 2015, 23:34
#1
22 Oct 2015, 23:34#1
PMtawarira0/000/1/4100006/2 0/030/0HBW du Plessis0/000/6/7701212/10/000/0PMalherbe0/000/2/3510007/10/000/0LEtzebeth0/000/1/13601025/02/010/0Lde Jager0/000/2/117000210/06/120/0FLouw0/000/4/73012217/00/000/0FBurger0/001/14/2659012316/10/020/0N8Vermeulen0/100/7/1590021012/21/020/0(H)Strauss0/000/2/71500003/00/000/0
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
22 Oct 2015, 23:42
#2
22 Oct 2015, 23:42#2
 As you can see from the Chart, Schalk made 59 metres in 26 carries with two offloads. The dead runners were our two locks....who averaged about half a metre per run. Schalk did turn over the ball three times, but our locks in less runs turned it over 4 times combined. They ran about the same number of times combined, as Schalk, but Schalk gained 4.6 times the metres.
You will hear a lot of bleating about Schalk because it fits the story line, but nothing about our unproductive locks because supposedly with their physicality they would dominate the gain line.
Moz keeping it real yet again.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
23 Oct 2015, 00:42
#3
23 Oct 2015, 00:42#3
Mozart
The bleating is not about Schalk Burger at all - even though you did not evaluate two  issues on his part - him losing ball possession 3 times and giving away 2 penalties is just not on.
There is also a fact that Burger got his balls in open field play as first receiver of the ball from the scrummie - while the carries of the locks were in traffic.
However, the real bleat is about the idiocy to use that strategy and cut out effectively the flyhalf and the rest of the backline from getting decent ball.  This could perhaps have been tried out a few times as a variation - but it was not and was standard play throughout the game against the Welsh.   The same strategy was used continuously and with disastrous consequences in the Japan test earlier in the tournament.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
23 Oct 2015, 02:14
#4
23 Oct 2015, 02:14#4
Probably overdone. We needed to move the ball into 12 channel before taking contact. But I doubt Schalk was in less traffic than the locks, he just wasn't part of a pod.  
AG
AgPleezDeddyClub Pro900 posts
23 Oct 2015, 03:01
#5
23 Oct 2015, 03:01#5
 I think Burger is an effective runner but we could mix it up more, give the opposition a bit more to think about.
Let's hope Pollard turns it on against the ABs  like last year 
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
23 Oct 2015, 10:20
#6
23 Oct 2015, 10:20#6

Um.....Schalk takes the ball as first receiver, ie flyhalf.......and has plenty of room to run in hence the metres gained.....the fact that he receives the ball some 3 times more than anyone else and is so ineffective with it, is the concern.


The locks only carry call in traffic, so the metre they gain is a good one.


Huge difference.......in effect the stats are telling us that the ball is going to the wrong person......Schalk is nowhere near productive enough running the ball a massive 26 times and only gaining 59 m


Half the ball Schalk is receiving should be going to our backs  

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news