CJ. Stampkar's amazing stat
Mozart
There is one thing a person can say about you - once you have taken a dislike to a player there is nothing such a player can do to remove that pet hate. Your prejudice will always predominate,
Looking at performance yesterday it is clear that Stander did very well yesterday - whether you like it or not. Before he first played for Ireland Stander was in competition with Alberts for selection, He is at least loosie - something one cannot say of Alberts,
As to your reference to Kolisi - he is a quota player who would never get selection in any top rugby team,
Mozart
Unlike you I look at all the stats - not only selected ones that could perhaps be used to support your statement. It is not only ball carries that determine the usefulness of a loosie, what about -
* breakdown ball protection and recovery; and
* tackles/defense
It also include usefulness in line-outs - althoughthat is definitely not the strong suit of many of th loosies and also not that on Stander. Fact is I would have liked Stabder to play at 8 for the Springboks or even at 7 - but that is not to be.
Mozart
Unlike you I look at all the stats - not only selected ones that could perhaps be used to support your statement. It is not only ball carries that determine the usefulness of a loosie, what about -
* breakdown ball protection and recovery; and
* tackles/defense
It also include usefulness in line-outs - althoughthat is definitely not the strong suit of many of th loosies and also not that on Stander. Fact is I would have liked Stabder to play at 8 for the Springboks or even at 7 - but that is not to be.
Than Vermeulen was before 2015 you mean - his all too frequent injuries have taken their toll/
....96 carries averaging 3.7 metres a carry is not too shabby when you consider he was also at the heart of a huge defensive effort not to mention his try scoring heroics and overall consistency..
Stander gets the last laugh though playing for a team ranked second in the world and challenging for #1 next year...whereas all the haters and naysayers that would'nt evenwant him in their team , they're ranked nowhere worth mentioning...
Brycy
You should know Mozart by now - once he dislikes a player the hatred is for keep s
Mozart
Lets go back in history a bit and compared the facts about a player you supported all out (Alberts) who had an average 4 carries per game in tests and in five tests would have had 20 carries with an average meter gain of 1,80 meters per carry.
Compared to Alberts who scores zero for ball protection and recovery Stander is a shining light in that facet of play,
Brycy is right about the try-scoring issue as well. In 43 tests Alberts scored 7 tries - ie 1 try on average per every 6 tests. Stander in 23 tests for Ireland scored 8 tries for an average of just under I try in every 3 tests played.
Mozart it is clear that prejudice got the better of you once again. LMAO
....yea talk about putting the anal in analysis...whether he took two extra steps more or less does'nt detract from the fact Stander was the standout No8 of the tournament and instrumental in the Irish success...
Six Nations team of the tournament...
https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-news/its-six-nations-team-tournament-14427671
...why would a Welsh journalist fabricate numbers to make the Irish look any better than they already are...the answer is they wouldn't...in the meantime i will look for a fk to give... but if Stander was'nt the standout No 8 of the tournament then who was pray tell us as we all need a good laugh..
...and the No8 of the 2018 6 Nations was...exactly - CJ Stander.. .i rest my case yr honor
First time I've seen someone reference an article praising a player as evidence that he's actually p00
...poi'e ..thats what you call disman tling yr own argument
Not necessarily, you put a lot of weight on defenders beaten whereas I want my ball carriers showing gain line dominance, I don't care how many defenders he beats as long as he's making meters over the gain line. He might not be as productive per carry as another no8, but he can carry more often and still be productive.
I'm not the biggest Stander fan, not for any other reason than I didn't like Saffex ramming him down our throat as the second coming. But IMHO there is no denying he was the form no8 of the tournament. You might prefer Faletau as a player, but he only played 2 games this campaign, Italy and France, to name him the tournament No.8 would be a bit of a stretch I would think
Moz If Stander is as useless as you seem to think he is, then the remaining 14 Irish players must be uber fantastic to carry the weight of the "slacker". Seeing as they managed to dispatch teams like England and Wales with relative ease!
What you are purposefully overlooking with your stats is that even 1 meter gained in heavy traffic that places your team on the front foot is very valuable. Just as not being turned over when in such a situation is very valuable. You seem to be basing your argument on him being a Pierre Spies type running no.8. Within the current Irish game plan, that is not his function. His function now is similar to that of Alberts back when he was in form for the Boks. Get over the advantage line, protect the ball, make your tackles, link with the back line. He is doing all of those things well, just as Alberts did way back when.
Mozart
You are on the losing end here and you should know why. You actually are seriously prejudiced.
So why did I refer to Alberts - the worst loosie the Springboks had over the past decade with a minimal work rate in games. The reason is obvious - Stander was in competition with him for a while for Springbok selection and Meyer was stupid enough (his normal state of mind) to pick a slow and clumsy spare prop as a loosie, a move you supported all out.
It is no use to try and side-track the issue as raised by me by referring to other top class loosies you used with one reference only. Better admit you were wrong in this case and your attack on Stander is unjustified and the result of prejudice.
Mozart
You are on the losing end here and you should know why. You actually are seriously prejudiced.
So why did I refer to Alberts - the worst loosie the Springboks had over the past decade with a minimal work rate in games. The reason is obvious - Stander was in competition with him for a while for Springbok selection and Meyer was stupid enough (his normal state of mind) to pick a slow and clumsy spare prop as a loosie, a move you supported all out.
It is no use to try and side-track the issue as raised by me by referring to other top class loosies you used with one reference only. Better admit you were wrong in this case and your attack on Stander is unjustified and the result of prejudice.
Stander has turned into a right plodder. I wouldn't want him playing for the Mighty Stormers for sure. No loss to Bok rugby at all. Generally I regret our players going overseas but I don't think wee Stander is even Super rugby standard - if you know your rugby!
Mozart
You mentioned one game where Alberts played in - it was the French test in 2012 I believe. However, Alberts had an average 4 ball carries per match - with an average gain of 1,8 meters per carry - fact. He was so slow and useless an excuse had to be developed for his poor ball carries and that is the myth that Alberts was a tackle breaker was raised by you - he was not a tackle breaker at all since he was clumsy. He rarely if ever got the Boks on the front foot - another of your myths.
There i s no evidence that Albert have the abilities you credit him with - but there is ample statistical evidence that he was a low work rate player and a liability on defense. He also was totally useless when it came to ball protection and recovery.
A huge mistake by you for not recognize uselessness when it hit you in the face.
Mozart
I am afraid Alberts did not play in the only test the Springboks played against England in 2014 on 15 November 2014.
In future you may find the following website usable as to stats on test matches:-
http://stats.espnscrum.com/scrum/rugby/records/team/match_results_year.html?id=1;type=class


