Dave - what do you think of the campaigns

I have read some rugby crap in my life......but seriously never have I read such utter rubbish recently when in comes to the merits of Matfield over Lood......I could get the debates if it was a close call, but the distance between these two players is so vast that it is not worth a serious discussion. The only thing Matfield has over Lood is experience and leadership.....if a coach selected that over merit, then he would have suffer the consequences. From a purely rugby standpoint, Matfield is not fit enough to tie Lood's bootlaces.

Closely followed by the garbage on Lood is the utter rubbish written about the merits of our centres......easily the best pair we have seen together since a young Jean/Fourie combo......difference being that these two are even better.......their software is in a different class. To question de Allende's strength is the most ignorant take on a player I have ever come across and now I see Moz questioning Kriels strength......based on what exactly. de Allende and Kriel once again were good against nobodies granted but good they were. It was not a polished performance by Kriel, but that try of his just showed his attacking class. His speed and feet are second to none. He is going to rip defences apart as the years go by. Long-term investment in these two along with Serfontein is a must.

As for questioning Malherbe's merits in the scrums yesterday, well that is just insulting. How the F  U  C   K can you be stupid enough to question anyone of the Bok pack when they marched the poor States pack backwards with interest in ever scrum....it was a massacre.

Apparently PSDT offered nothing either....what a load of crap, he took over from Lood, as dominant in the line-outs, carrying the ball and defending. Great outing by the young man.

Morne was his usual self, nothing special.....should he be on the bench ahead of Lambie......NEVER