FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  De Allende/ de Jongh our best centre pairing...

De Allende/ de Jongh our best centre pairing...

Started by Mozart16 REPLIES281 VIEWS· 18 Apr 2015, 23:15
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
18 Apr 2015, 23:15
#1
18 Apr 2015, 23:15#1

...by a mile, in this S15.  It's all de Allende the de Jongh detractors will say. But it's not...de Jongh may be the junior partner physically, but his super fast rush defence is killing our opponents attack. And his run early in the Force game showed you just how hard he is to put away. They combine very well


I don't think Juan is quite top international class, and I think for the WC we would be better served by a bigger centre. But right now no other 13  is putting up his hand. 


Nor is it as simple as Kriel being moved to 13 after the S15 season, top level 13 play has to be learned. If Kriel is to be a factor he needs time there now. And frankly JJ is so lacking  in confidence it may actually improve the Bools chances. That said it's a tough call for a coach to make.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
19 Apr 2015, 05:47
#2
19 Apr 2015, 05:47#2
 De Jongh is a real defense liability which which made him a zero insofar as top class center play is concerned.   In his last two games he made 14 tackles missing 5.   That leaves him with a missed tackle ratio of  26,1% - which is in line with the ratio of last year.
De Allende missed too many tackles too - but that is understandable - he has to cover for the flops outside of him and that is where the majority of his misses occurred.  
De Jongh last played for the Springboks in 2012 and was an utter flop - he went AWOL in both tests he played in and nothing will change if he is selected again.  Anybody even thinking he would be a suitable selection must really think about what he is capable of and what he can produce in all aspects of the game and what he produced the last two times he played for the Springboks.              
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
19 Apr 2015, 06:04
#3
19 Apr 2015, 06:04#3

Rubbish Moronic, de Jongh was pressing forward to trap the movement, a few times he closed the outside and the opponent slipped back inside into the defence....exactly what de Jongh was trying to achieve. He defended brilliantly against the Force, which would be clear if you weren't a old hooker trying to understand back play.

 

Here you have a picture of some outstanding centre play. De Jongh by the way made the most Stormers' metres and the most clean breaks.

 

You don't have enough honesty to even give him one bit of credit. I have never come across a more biased poster and consequently a more unreliable one. One cannot believe a word you write.  

 

Cde Jongh0/000/5/6632320 7/30/000/0Cde Allende0/002/1/7331512 9/30/010/0
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
19 Apr 2015, 06:07
#4
19 Apr 2015, 06:07#4
 Mozart
Sure his defense was brilliant with a missed tackle ratio of  30%.   What a farce do you make of rugby as a game when you comment on issues.  
I am not biased at all - unlike you I look at all aspects of the game and give credit where credit is due.  I did say De Jongh made a good intercept against the Waratahs and that he was good yesterday in some aspects of his performance is clear.  However, I also point out where he fails and that is in defense - where he failed in both his last two games.      
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
19 Apr 2015, 06:13
#5
19 Apr 2015, 06:13#5

You simply dont get the rush defence. B ut then why would you, life is above your pay grade!

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
19 Apr 2015, 06:29
#6
19 Apr 2015, 06:29#6
 Rushed defense  is not a new excuse - you used it when it when it fits your book - in other words when a failed defender is to be protected against factual deficiencies.  Stop harping on what I do in private life - that has bugger all to do with you - and start thinking about rugby,  a game where you have the most limited knowledge of imaginable.      
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
19 Apr 2015, 20:51
#7
19 Apr 2015, 20:51#7
Please let us not have wee de Jongh anywhere near a Bok side.Much better players exist like kriel, Vorster,  Jan, Odendaal. Pity Stokkies Hanekom has been injured - when is he due back.Then there is Sadie and Mapoe and JP. Estwehuisdbn is growing in confidence too.
Allende can paly 13 so no worries. Jean may come back well rested and on fire - we shall see.
De Jongh is a big no no. Why pick a proven non performer  for the Boks. His tackling is powder puff and his distribution skills are putrid. 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
19 Apr 2015, 21:30
#8
19 Apr 2015, 21:30#8
 Beeno
The last info about two weeks ago was that Hanekom would be back in three weeks time - so his return to full training is likely to be soon.   I would love to see how he and Vorster combines at center - that could be an eye-opener for all of us.  
I must admit I was more impressed by Vorster than odendaal in their few outings - I think Vorster is a smoother and more dangerous player than Odendaal.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
19 Apr 2015, 22:52
#9
19 Apr 2015, 22:52#9
De Jongh is small by modern centre standards,but technically he plays the position better than Mapoe, Sadie, and all these other unproven guys. Right now he looks like the best SA13 in the S15. 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
20 Apr 2015, 03:27
#10
20 Apr 2015, 03:27#10
 What a farce - he does not play better than other 13's in Super 15 and that includes Mapoe, Sadie and Venter.   I am not an Engelbrecht admirer and Murray is just plain and simple useless.    He is better than the latter two - but worse than the first three mentioned.
Jones was better than De Jongh ever was in the tournament in the game against the Hurricanes.
De Jongh again has the worst defensive stats of any 13 in SA and that makes him totally unsuitable to be classified as the best 13 at present in SA Super 15 teams.        
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
20 Apr 2015, 11:08
#11
20 Apr 2015, 11:08#11
de Jongh......bwhaaahaaaaaa.......what did he do?  
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
20 Apr 2015, 14:52
#12
20 Apr 2015, 14:52#12

Made the most metres of any Stormer on Saturday....beat 3  tackles and made 2 clean brea ks.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
20 Apr 2015, 15:03
#13
20 Apr 2015, 15:03#13

That will be the first time this season...just a pity his defence is so crap......the guy is a joke.......who in their right mind would select an 87kg player at outside centre in this day and age.......the guy should not even be playing S15 level.


Don't get me wrong.....if the game was downsized and played by little guys only, de Jongh would stand out.....for he is a talented player.


Its just no longer the game for little guys, in particular at centre amongst the backs.


de Jongh was solid enough, but Sadie was again better

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
20 Apr 2015, 16:40
#14
20 Apr 2015, 16:40#14

Dave, a simple straight question....


why do you say Waylon Murray is a has been? 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
20 Apr 2015, 17:02
#15
20 Apr 2015, 17:02#15

Because injury has got the better of him and he has never been the player he was for the short period he was not injured some years back.......I see no point in investing in him......its part of the problem the Sharks have.....poor investment.


He is still solid enough.....but the Sharks have better youngsters about that should be playing.........look no further than Tyler Fisher

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
21 Apr 2015, 11:34
#16
21 Apr 2015, 11:34#16
 Correct me if I'm wrong but when I hear the term has-been I always think of someone, especially in the sporting arena, as one who has achieved at a high level in the past......what has Waylon Murray achieved that is of note?
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
21 Apr 2015, 12:01
#17
21 Apr 2015, 12:01#17

Has been for me is a player over the hill or where injury has got the better of him regardless of his achievements......Murray has always played top flight rugby at test, CC and S15 that in itself is better than the average man.......Wentzel is a has been, Botes was one by the time he retired.


I don't associate has been with level of achievement......its mostly about age, where a player is nowhere near as good as he used to be - Matfield is the perfect example, as is Murray.   

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news