De Jager a flexible ray of hope; Rugby 365
Lood has always been good, stood out in a poor Cheetahs side in 2014, making TOW often.
Quality player, has size, strength and a great work rate......good skills and imposes himself physically.
We have a number of others that are of similar quality, sadly useless Meyer has missed out on two of them in Willemse and Jacques du Plessis.
The Bok pack should have at least 3 of Etzebeth, Willemse, Lood, PSDT or du Plessis in the starting 15, with one of them on the bench. Both du Plessis and PSDT are at home at 7 and would be my options there even though both are better locks.
A Bok pack should always have the physicality of 3 of these along with Bismark and Vermeulen. Add two grunt props starting with Kitshoff at 1 and one of Malherbe, Marcel or Coenie at 3
Bakkies the enforcer Vic the athlete. Now days 4 and 5 are both enforcer and athlete. We see the likes of Etzebeth, Lood, PSDT, Lewies, Jacques du Plessis and Flip being equally at home at 4 or 5.
So it is, Lood disagrees with you. He also defends Victor indirectly. With all things considered, I'd say your position is quite untenable. haha hahaha!
Lood says stuff all about liability Matfield
Old Lomp has pulled a neat trick here...only call yourself in the lineouts. But the few times you don't, call the number 8 and loop around. That way you can look like a hero every time. No wonder Eben looked like he could chew glass on the bench.
Geez Moz up your game....you are starting to sound more and more like idiot Fox.
What part of me saying PSDT was a lock who could play 7...much like the impressive du Plessis did you miss huh?
Funny thing is Lood has rubbed egg all over your face for the past 3 weeks. PSDT is even better than Lood so in time you are going to feel a ripe old idiot.
But talk us through Eben missing out because of Loods line out calls....let me guess...just because Eben was under utilised in the line outs this somehow affected his ability to go on the charge, clear rucks or put in some big hits on the day.
Wow Lood had special powers maybe we should make him captain
Talk us throw Loods calls affecting the rest of Eben s game?
You cannot argue with people whose main aim in rugby is to support players who are non-productive and lie through their teeth when it come to facts. De Jager "calling himself in every line-out" when he in fact called 5 out of 11 line-outs to go to himself is typical of their thinking. They cannot find a real reason to demonize De Jager since he performed so much better than low activity Matfield - they must invent a lie and persist with it. Our very local Herr Goebbels is really very good at emulating his norm - spread a lie repeatedly and eventually somebody might just believe it.
It is tragic to see members demean themselves to that level - but is also funny to see how they manage to do so .
Were there 16 line-out calls as claimed by you originally or less? How many line-outs did De Jager call to come to him - is it still De Jager " calling himself in every lineout"?
You really got yourself into a mess here - so how are you going to get out of this one? Spluttering won't help you here - you were practising the system here of if you repeat a lie often enough - it may become the truth in the minds of some.
The last contribution was a nice try - it may have been the result of a specific game plan though - so it is not really an answer. So lets get some real cogent answers this time around.
Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 12824Etzebeth was invisible they say.....
August 09, 2015, 15:05:04
They all say that, the fans....the incredibly imperceptive rugby press. But Etzebeth was just huge against Oz and NZ, so what gives. Has he suddenly lost form?
The key was in the Lomp try. Lomp is powered over with Etzebeth pushing behind him. The key is in the lineout calls yesterday. Burger was called 4 times, Lomp 5 times....Etzebeth once. And in at least 2 of Burger's lineouts Lomp was designated to sweep round taking the ball from him.
In other words Etzebeth was engaged once in the lineouts, Lomp seven times.....based on Lomp's calls.
Lomp was also the player who stood off the rucks to take the ball supported by others including Etzebeth. Etzebeth made one run....Lomp made 9 for an ordinary 23 metres.
What gives, why has Etzebeth been removed from his role in the lineouts and in the tough carries. He is a much better athlete than Lomp. Hell he gassed Ben Smith up the sidelines a few years ago.
Who knows, but it would be comforting if our rugby press had the smarts to figure out Etzebeth's role has changed rather than bemoan his absence.
He started off with the 16 story - when that did not pan out - he posted the follow-up statement quoted above admitting to De Jager calling the ball to himself only five times - but keep on referring to the 16 story. Now suddenly the explanation is that he called the ball to come to him "phased play".
Stop BSting - it is no good. Post your original statement and repeated ones - not the one where you tried to cover up your original lies. The following is typical:-
"Old Lomp has pulled a neat trick here...only call yourself in the lineouts. But the few times you don't, call the number 8 and loop around. That way you can look like a hero every time. No wonder Eben looked like he could chew glass on the bench."
Herr Goebbels you are and Herr Goebbels you will always remain.
So let me try again, here is the follow up post, which again makes it totally clear two days ago:
Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 12828RE: Etzebeth was invisible they say.....
August 10, 2015, 03:19:26
Well let's provide some help then.....in aggregate Lomp who was leading the pack called himself in lineouts and phase play 16 times....he called Etzebeth 2 times. What's the bloody mystery that we saw Lomp a whole lot more than Etzebeth.
Edit post
You have no comprehensive problems - an habitual liar never has. You think you are so clever - you can get away with lies.


