Posted 04 July 2014 - 02:51 PM
Barnacle, on 04 Jul 2014 - 2:48 PM, said:
Yeah, but I don't post there... So I was also just giving Vlagman some extra info too...
Added to that I also know that most of the posters here understand the value of the players more than what they seem to understand on other sites (not only "that" site) in general... The "exercise" of getting this info was also interesting enough, so that I thought I would be good to share here for everyone to see it too.
I agree. I was just playing the devils advocate.
I hope the house is a nice one
I am going nowhere, sorry to disappoint you
As I thought and said, now some random guy gets blamed for Rooinek's non existant sleuthing capabilities.
Pathetic
Add cruise liner to your achievement Rooinek, you left that out, but included the rod and sinker I see
Shame
My previous comment is probably correct then, this Stu person is possibly the only one who made the spelling mistake on this other site.
I cannot prove if there are others that did, but if so, Sorry Stu, it was only an observation that if there was only one, they would be crucified here.
Sadly, I was right.
Up the Germans !!!!!!!
Hi Admit One / Moaner
Didn't you also post on the old Supersport website
Sorry if I am wrong, just sounds vaguely familiar, but not sure
Becs
I have seen and read and enjoyed many of your posts on here for a long time, so I would think I knew you from that.
If I got the wrong end of it, maybe I read too much into your post at the time
As for SafeSex... well his post above just shows the calibre of the man, and defending what he says sometimes to some decent folk on here could be seen as biased.
Just my take
Up the Germans !!!!!!
DA who gives a flying fuck what you think?
My point was merely that you are not Stu, he was a good lad - you are a fucking waste of space - get it?
Well clearly you do SafeSex
Up the Germans !!!!!!
Hey SafeSex
I honestly only saw this stat now... I swear
The first thing you have got correct in 8361 posts
I am not Stu
Well done my buddy
What sounded like a simple question has 3 days later attracted 72 responses with only one poster half interested in answering the question, every other poster ignored the question and set about the de-moleing process.
Like everyone else, I believe the question is irrelevant and attention seeking.
Just bye the bye, the quoted post is 2 years old and written soon after the founding fathers set about resurrecting a dying forum.
Here's my take....
1) The Devil's Advocate is not Stu or Bedpan.
2) He is not a mole from Kamp Voetsek.
3) He posted alongside of us on other forums but under a different handle.
4) It's hard to believe when he says he read posts on various forums but never posted on any of them. And if he did post then we'd all remember the unusual handle of the Devil's Advocate.
5) He has no credibilty until he comes clean.
There used to be a poster trading as Charlie something, I can't remember his full handle but at a guess that's who I think is the Devil's Advocate.
Beeno
You really should stop singing Stu's praises, he didn't have a decent thing to say about when you were banned and he had some spiteful things to say after you finally left Kamp Poephol.
Just Win
There is a fair amount of baggage still floating around from past forums and the moles visit here to unload on individual posters, too cowardly to post under the nicks we're familiar with hence our reaction and suspicion.
Draad
Thank you for your kind words, it came as a surprise.