One very positive aspect of our rugby is our depth in number 10's. Cant believe even HM will include Morne Steyn, or will he not come September.
Some highlights...some a bit old but nevertheless all our no 10s are young.
Patrick Lambie
Handre Pollard
Elton Jantjies
Yep in order I'd say we have
Pollard
Jantjies
Lambie
Goosen
All test quality
Absolute bullshit Moz......Lambie won us the England test and had as much to do with the losses to Ireland and Wales as the side as a whole did. Lambie proved his test status ages ago.
Your take on Jantjies is based on history, try move on and judge him on the now.
When last was Goosen injured? He has muscled up and stayed injury free all year. He proved against Oz that he has test rugby written all over him.
I'll say it again, we have 4 test quality flyhalves in Pollard, Jantjies, Lambie and Goosen......without question.
Lestat true to form.......Morne better than Lambie, Jantjies and Goosen........bwhaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
F U C K M E
Yeah bring up the footage you ignorant bafoon......you keep threatening footage and we never see it.
That break by Goosen was better than any break Morne has EVER achieved at test level and that after 10 wasted years of having that donkey as our pivot.
Add Etzebeth to the list of players he does not rate.......what a fucking idiot
Lambie won us the English test?????????.....this is how myths are started. What rubbish. he gained exactly zero metres, turned over the ball once and missed kicks to the poles.
When the match was in the balance, and the pom hooker was sent off......Lambie had a penalty, which he kicked dead. Exactly the mistake Morne was crucified for. That could easily have been a game losing mistake. But of course unlike Morne, Lambkins was given a pass by the Natal set.
Finally at the end of the match he got over a medium difficulty penalty and a drop, rectifying some of his earlier misses. It was a very jittery performance, with no authority at all.
I think I'll go with Mallett's correct take on Lambie and Reinach's performance against the Poms, where he said they were outstanding and should be proud of their performances.
Lambie and Reinach were excellent in that game.
Questioning Lambie as a test standard player is insulting tom say the least especially when one fool mentions the utterly useless Morne as a better option.
What fucking rugby do you gents watch......its clearly not the same as the majority of us out there.
I've been asking that question of Moz for years, but at least he carries some credibility unlike Lestat who is just simply useless on the rugby front.
Nothing much....which is the point. Hospital passes, being smeared backwards, being charged down desperately close to our line and making an atrocious cross kick. And then there is that "helluva mistake" kicking the penalty dead.
That was.....waaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahah.....outstanding?
I know, I would not really waste my time on Lestat......there is just no hope with that guy.
I have read some rugby crap in my life but Lestat takes the biscuit.....he wins hands down.
Imagine being anti Etzebeth, de Allende, Jean, Lambie, Goosen, Reinach, McCaw.......to name but a few and then being pro Morne, de Wet Barry and de Jongh
Ja well Liarmike if you looked at lestat's tape, which you wont because you are too mentally lazy, you will see Lambie doing several things you accuse Morne of:
1) Kicking a penalty at a crucial stage and not finding touch.
2) Getting charged down.
3) Getting dominated in the tackle.
4) Wasting good ball in the 22 with an ill directed cross kick
5) Missing key penalties
6) Passing the ball inside his own 22.
All in the space of one mediocre game.
