Dont worry chaps

Well, collectively they amount to more than your great picks. Hows the greatest 13 since readmission these days?

 Elephants

 Dave 
You missed out on De Jongh - how can you do that when mentioning the present flops Desert Disaster adores?  He will be most upset!!!!!!

 de Jongh? The third best 13 statiatically speaking under Meyer - Damian is bottom, lol! Yes him. He sealed off his channel perfectly. Too bad Lambie starved the backline of ball. But what about Damian? Not so hot against Australia. Suddenly all the issues I forewarned were coming have engulfed you all.

 How the Disaster rates players is a mystery only known to himself.  Take for instance De Jongh - who went AWOL in the two tests he played in 2012 and did squat - being the third best pick of Meyer's 13's.  One has to wonder who the other two picks are - will indeed be fun to see those two names.    

Well with Damian and JJ the worst defenders statistically, it certainly won't be them! de Jongh was a rock on the EOYT. 

 Now that is fun - the idiot is not prepared to come up with the other two names who were according to him better than De Jongh.   Then there was the stats.  When I mentioned it Mozart could find no reason why it happened and the reason was that De Jongh was constantly hiding out on the field on the side where the ball would never go - so that is why he went AWOL.  Lambie must obviously get the blame for everything - but that is standard in this case.          

I went through the stats last year. Fourie was top, JP and Jean were next up. Taute, JJ, Damian were rock bottom. Damian is on course to surpass JJ. 

 Your interpretation of stats is as weird as all other interpretations are as well.  You know zero about stats evaluation and that makes your statement about stats so funny.  I can remember the saga when you quoted the 2013 unevaluated stats on Francois Steyn and claimed how good he was - while he was so poor his coach himself said he is no center.   Evaluation of his stats showed he was piss-poor.  I can go through the stats of Fourie, JP and De Villiers as well - but it would not help - since you would never understand anything about stats evaluation.
By the way  I cannot help but to laugh at your top choice of Fourie.  In three matches   He carried the ball 8 times for a meter gain of 7 meters.  That meant he made zero impact in attacking play - so he was worse in that aspect of the game than any of the other outside centers mentioned.   That said - his defense was shown statistically -as being solid.  He made the tackles in cases where he could get to the ball carrier - but because of his pace deficiency players he could not get to just ran circles around him.   Davies in the Welsh test did it twice.  That type of thing is not shown up in stats.  Hig joke your first choice.        

Your arrogance is only surpassed by the length of your nose. 

 Fransies stats contradicted nothing at all - what it did confirm he was piss-poor.
"Of course you dislike footage the most because there is no room for deception!  I recount your bold but foolish assertion that video footage is a gross frabrication of the truth! "
Another lie by a feeble-minded idiot.  What I did say is that interpretation of video evidence must be correct and not fabricated.  You and Mozart had been caught out so often in fabricating false interpretations of what actually happened that it is hard to make any sense of it.  Nothing wrong with the video evidence - everything wrong with deceptive interpretation amd outright lies in which you and Mozart specializes.       

They confirmed that Frans was better than Bosman, Lambie, Butch and all the other alternatives tried at 12! That is a very important point. Now if nearly 6 players could not play exceptionally well, that would put Plum under the spotlight. It then becomes patently obvious why he was sacked and that was his final Super rugby season. But we must not neglect to mention that you endorsed the Sharks losing streak this year, branding it as the dawn of a new age devoid of shackles. So clearly we are differing in our estimation of excellence.

 Desert Disaster
They confirmed only one thing - that Steyn was the worst inside center that year in anby SA Franchise - he was piss-poor in both defense and attacking play.  
 "But we must not neglect to mention that you endorsed the Sharks losing streak this year "   Another outright lie - what a farce we have here.   What I did say specifically is that Steyn duplicated this year the same deficiencies shown in 2013 and 2014.  From an attacking perspective he made one line break in 2014 beating in total 8 defenders and this year it was 1 line break beating 9 defenders.  I never justified the fact that the Sharks was on a losing streak - I condemned it - and pointed out that John Smit was primarily responsible for the fiasco.   His firing of Plumtree was a huge mistake - hisd bringing in his cronies from England (Stevens, Wentzel and Botha) an even bigger one.  His appointment of three coaches within less than two years was also a fiasco,   What io did say is that there was virtually no team renewal for years  and that it has to commence forthwith,   
The tea was saddled with duds like Alberts, Botha, Wentzel. Stevens, Steyn and were also burdened by a poor display by other players like the Du Plessis brothers - who showed little regard for discipline and is leaving the Sharks as well.  So a rebuilding exercise is essential and that is what i did say.   One of the main problems remain though - what to do with the poor fatso who pretends he is a center.  The Sharks will only improve if they can get rid of that dud as well.            

So, with essentially the same team of last year, the difference was not in coaching? Just Alberts and Frans? That despite the Sharks winning more with Frans than without? Makes perfect sense, if you fell into a vat of opium extract.