Vlagshit, I know you are a fucking stupid Dutchman, but what is your Dutch point - geez how thick are you?
Just for the record, JJ's defensive stats in the RC last year were better than Jean's.......suck on that you stupid ignorant prick
Vlagshit, I know you are a fucking stupid Dutchman, but what is your Dutch point - geez how thick are you?
Just for the record, JJ's defensive stats in the RC last year were better than Jean's.......suck on that you stupid ignorant prick
Stick to your taal Dutchie, it goes with your conservatism.......you found your comb yet?
But as I said take your taal to the other board, we respect non Afrikaans speaking people on this site
Now fuck off or find a bridge
Lol
Handbags ready !!
My point Becs is backline players are often not subbed until a result is clear. There is usually little need to sub them barring some injury niggle. In tests backline subs often sit out the game.
But this was a Junior World Final! And it was as close as it could be. Why sub a player who is already approaching test standard when the game is in the balance. Surely if Esterhuizen was the player who was likely to break things open he would have stayed on the park?
Apparently the coach felt differently.
Has Becs ever once disagreed with SafeSex?
Just curious, because in the short time I have been around here, she always pops up at the most opportune time to defend him or backup his claims.
I wonder if they work within eyesight of each other, because the times where she comes on here with some comeback is quite startling.
No offense Becs, I thoroughly enjoy your posts.... just extremely curious is all
And if SafeSex is your toyboy... you go girl !!
You are far better than that Becs
Don't be so hard on yourself
You have put up with Saffex for so long, I don't blame you
This debate is a no-brainer, have a look at the video, there is a no more neutral judge.
The kid has a poor tackling technique so I hope he learns how to tackle, fortunately he has time on his side.
Moz if you had actually watched the game you will have realised that Etserhuizen got injured after his massive collision with his opposite number, Sloan - it was a monster impact which also resulted in Sloan getting injured. It was 102kg vs 106kgs of centres at full tilt.....Sloan was the player that landed on his arse.
So Moz, that is the reason Esterhuizen was pulled.
Denny so you conclude that on the evidence of one tackle, that he has a bad technique - are you fucking stupid? Let me guess, the huge impact he made defensively all JWC was due to his poor technique?
There is nothing worse than an ignorant poster passing judgement based on one missed tackle - geez how pathetically naïve - get a bloody grip man and learn the art of gaining the facts before speaking utter shit.
Theron's comment after losing Esterhuizen for the pool game against NZ was his concern that the Baby Boks will have lost the physical edge defensively without Esterhuizen - glad to be of service.
A question, how much of Esterhuizen have you ACTUALLY seen?
Um no Moz he was injured, what part of that did you not get?
I doubt one of the stars of the side would have been judged as ineffective by Theron.
Which Kriel are you referring to? Jessie or Dan??
Its just a pity Duhan dropped a simple pass after being put into space by Gallant for a try......other than that he was good.
Nice to see you adding your 2cents worth though - particularly insightful for a man that never saw the game!!
More like Ester than Esterhuizen. Will this kid learn how to tackle. The prospects aren't good, players who arent natural tacklers seldom learn the trick.
Moz is this your informed opinion based on watching this guy......bwhaaaahaaaaaaaaa
What a bloody joke - your credibility with that comment has gone down the tubes.......its one thing commenting on a player you have watched but its a bit of a stretch when it comes to one you have not seen.
No wonder you think Meyer is on the right track, you are clearly losing your marbles
No Moz, just as with the Barrett try where suddenly the likes of Jean and Morne were according to you excused of guilt and JJ was the sole blame, this case is no different......Esterhuizen missed with his rush, but play continued thereafter with other players missing tackles and therefore to blame him for the try is just laughable as with most of your takes on passages of play. The reality of the situation never plays any part in your analysis.......the prevailing theme is that you interpret these passages of play according to your rating of a player.
No doubt Esterhuizen has entered the Moz anti list - watch this space
