FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Homo naledi

Homo naledi

Started by bluebok16 REPLIES994 VIEWS· 10 Sept 2015, 11:32
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BL
bluebokPro3,977 posts
10 Sept 2015, 11:32
#1
10 Sept 2015, 11:32#1
They have just discovered Homo naledi in the Cradle of human kind in South Africa. Displaying primitive characteristics and human characteristics. The fossils are numerous and very complete and are quite obviously part of the human family tree . Yet another nail in the creationist coffin! 
MO
moolaaPro2,380 posts
10 Sept 2015, 12:16
#2
10 Sept 2015, 12:16#2
 Bluebok, is this Naledi bloke old enough to be Victor's locking partner?Meyer's keen on experience it seems...
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
10 Sept 2015, 12:18
#3
10 Sept 2015, 12:18#3
 moolaa
  Probably - but he is on the young side to partner Matfield.    
BL
bluebokPro3,977 posts
10 Sept 2015, 16:16
#4
10 Sept 2015, 16:16#4
LOL! 
Pretty interesting stuff this. Apparently, they have found a bunch of fossils in what appears to be a tomb. Indicating that this ancient species had rituals surrounding death, which would have to imply self awareness. As one would expect of an early version of a human. 
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
10 Sept 2015, 16:47
#5
10 Sept 2015, 16:47#5
 
Homo wat se goed???
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
10 Sept 2015, 17:32
#6
10 Sept 2015, 17:32#6
 If it proves one thing, it sure is that we know very little of the real history of our planet and from what we do know, it is clear that some things will forever remain a mystery. Blue, I don't think creationists are too much trouble with the discovery. The Young Earth dudes have ignored much more tangible proof in the past, so this won't phase them in the slightest.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
10 Sept 2015, 22:24
#7
10 Sept 2015, 22:24#7
 Good one moola
BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
10 Sept 2015, 22:58
#8
10 Sept 2015, 22:58#8
Seeing the thread title I assumed that the Fijians had unearthed yet another superstar wing .
BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
11 Sept 2015, 00:59
#9
11 Sept 2015, 00:59#9
 
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
11 Sept 2015, 09:19
#10
11 Sept 2015, 09:19#10
 Bruce Springsteen's Take

They prosecuted some poor sucker in these united states
For teachin' that man descended from the apes
They coulda settles that case without a fuss or fight
If they'd seen me chasin' you sugar
Thru the jungle last night
They'd a called in that jury and a one two three said
'part man part monkey, definitely'

Well the church bell rings from the corner steeple
Man in a monkey suit swears he'll do no evil
Offers his lover's prayer but his soul lies
Dark and driftin and unsatisfied
Well hey bartender tell me what'd ya see
Part man part monkey looks like to me

Well the night is dark the moon is full
The flowers of romance exert their pull
We talk a while my fingers slip
I'm hard and cracking like a whip

Well did God make man in a breath of holy fire
Or did he crawl on up out of the muck and mire
Well the man on the street
Believes what the Bible tells him so
But you can ask me mister because I know
Tell them soul-suckin' preachers to come on down and see
Part man part monkey, baby that's me



Read more: Bruce Springsteen - Part Man Part Monkey Lyrics | MetroLyrics 
BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
11 Sept 2015, 10:09
#11
11 Sept 2015, 10:09#11
 Skerp .
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
11 Sept 2015, 10:42
#12
11 Sept 2015, 10:42#12
 bb
Found a new name for Victor Matfield.  It is either Victor Naledi or Naledi Matfield - which one would be the most suitable?    
BL
bluebokPro3,977 posts
11 Sept 2015, 14:23
#13
11 Sept 2015, 14:23#13
Hahaha, not the direction I expected this thread to go, but funny none the less!
Mike, how about Homo Matfield? 
DA
Devil's AdvocatePro7,008 posts
11 Sept 2015, 14:39
#14
11 Sept 2015, 14:39#14
We will never know
It's all a ssumptions
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
11 Sept 2015, 15:32
#15
11 Sept 2015, 15:32#15
 What is all assumptions? I agree I would know to what extent.
DA
Devil's AdvocatePro7,008 posts
11 Sept 2015, 15:55
#16
11 Sept 2015, 15:55#16
We assume we know what happened exactly 3.4 million years ago or 20 million years ago until some new evidence or theory comes along and blows it out the water.  
Science is ever evolving and re-aligning it's original theories.
Things like this can never be a confirmed scientific fact.... never
People are still not even convinced that carbon dating is infallible
 
AO
Admit OneClub Pro389 posts
11 Sept 2015, 16:55
#17
11 Sept 2015, 16:55#17
  

 




— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news