FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  How useless is de Jongh defensively?

How useless is de Jongh defensively?

Started by Saffolk 45 REPLIES477 VIEWS· 28 Apr 2014, 19:20
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
06 May 2014, 08:46
#41
06 May 2014, 08:46#41
 De Allende played either inside center or wing this series and not at 13 - so stop being an idiot - you stupid old so-and-so.  Whenever you try to prove something you get trumped because  you do not know the basic principles of the game of rugby and that is a fact. 
You are a rugby illiterate that cannot understand that - 
*   the function of a flyhalf is not only to kick at goal;*   a flyhalf plays a critical role in the functioning of the backline as a whole;*   the sole function for locks is not only to call an d jump in line-outs or catch a few kick ins that by accident my land within catching range - locks have other functions as well;*   that ball protection and recovery and ball skills are critical requirements for a loosie.
Shall i go on - the list of examples of illiteracy is endless.              
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
06 May 2014, 08:52
#42
06 May 2014, 08:52#42
 Oh so now he played inside centre, but before this you said:
 BALLS = De Allende in that game played at wing - De Jongh at center.   And then you look at one game and said that is the trend.  With defensive stats they are only meaningful if you can determine competence or deficiency over a series of games.   

So now you change your story again....and even centre stats in the same game are not comparable. Here's a hint old chop....they can't both play 13 in the same game. As I said, sheer world class stupidity.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
06 May 2014, 09:01
#43
06 May 2014, 09:01#43
Dimwit
You compare stats of players playing at 12 with other players playing at 12 and players playing at 13 with other 13's.   Can't you get that into your thick skull?   I can never be a rugby illiterate like you, so I can never reach your level of stupidity on rugby matters.  You have a lead on that insofar as all members of this site is concerned - an insurmountable lead. 
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
06 May 2014, 09:12
#44
06 May 2014, 09:12#44
Hahaha, but recently you claimed anybody who missed more than 20  per cent of his tackles wasn't acceptable....regardless of his position. You were groping towards the truth, tackling stats aren't just comparable between 12s or 13s ....they are comparable against a standard. And they are particularly useful if garnered from the same matches.

Stay down Oom before you contradict yourself again.






CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
06 May 2014, 09:33
#45
06 May 2014, 09:33#45
 Dimwit
The general rule is that missed tackle ratio's of 20%+ is not acceptable - but you are too bloody stupid to realize that it should not be based in one match only - but over a series.   Shut up - before you expose your rugby illiteracy even further.  
3K
3ku1Pro2,580 posts
06 May 2014, 11:21
#46
06 May 2014, 11:21#46
 oh back and off and back and off, look at this stat, stuff off my 27% vs urs 26, i win lol, nobody wins. De jongh great attacker crap defender simple as that.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news