Illusion

Linda??

Linda??

Seeing as you asked twice, Damme Linda is Herr Albi/Cleancut/Pinky la Femme/Indabagingi. 

https://youtu.be/1pIyHajsu08

Mozart 

You have as per normal being wring on the Stander issue,   Stander cannot play  any professional rugby after  his retirement at Munster without losing the benefits from a scheme operated ny Munster.  

Jake White phoned him  to  play for the Bulls, but  he refused and explained the reason for his refusal.   White stated the above in a newspaper report/  

As far as I know the Lions Team is made up of  PROFESSIONAL RUGBY PLAYERS.       

And Munster wouldn’t have extended the contract with him for 3 months so he could play for the Lions? If they  wanted him, which they don’t.

You clearly don’t have a clue about the Lions’ compensation arrangements. Read this:

.

‘So players could net something in the region of £65,000 if it’s a triumphant trip.

The Lions also pay the players’ clubs for access to them.

That figure is traditionally around £50,000 per player. It’s not clear what the amount will be this time.’

....

So the player will be paid by the Lions and the clubs will get compensation as well. Every reason to extend Stampkar’s contract. No reason not to, from the club’s perspective.

Gatland explained he never wanted the Stampkar type. My guess is Stampkar knew this long before his sudden retirement.

And nobody in his camp has denied that he simply wasn’t selected as EVERY newspaper reported.

Wake up you clueless Old Queen.

 You are now BSting again with  a totally false assumption.    Munster would have renewed his contract if Stander applied for renewal.    Stander did NOT  apply for any renewal whatsoever,.    So from the  start you were lying again/

Did Gatland  say he did not want Stander in the team?  No he did not and your assumptions about  player performances  are so warped that nobody  could ever believe the BS you cone  up with about your pet hate players.

Youi are a totally screwed  by  the distorted garbage you make up in that  rugby  illiterate   brain of yours,  You constantly give false descriptions in what happened in games to discredit players you dislike and now this garbage discrediting even Jake White,  who one assume knew exactly what happened and stated so publicly,.    

What a bloody useless and total farce you are.   No wonder Dave saw clearly what was going on and could not take your garbage anymore,   SO BACK TO BS ALERT AGAIN - AS YOU HAVE NEVER EVEN BOTHERED TO INVESTIGATE ANYTHING BEFORE MAKING ASSUMPTIONS,.     I will in future not comment on  any of your rugby posts and warn people about your BS spreading only.                                            

Ah the Old Queen waxes hysterical. Of course Gatland never came out and fingered Stampkar, but he clearly had Stampkar and Vunipola in mind when he said this:

‘ Despite wanting big physical players like 6ft 5in, 17 and a half stone Hill, Gatland says he needs players with a point of difference and the footwork to evade the Springboks’ giant forwards. Players like Sam Simmonds, who with 16 tries for the season so far is one score away from equalling the all-time single-season record in the Gallagher Premiership with four games to play.

Gatland said: “Looking at South Africa, if you tuck the ball under your arm and run straight they love that type of thing. 

“I am conscious of having that balance in our backrow with players with footwork, Sam Simmonds has got that, Taulupe Faletau has got that and that deception and some of the other loose forwards as well. 

“He is quick, we can run lots of variations with him from the lineout, and you see Exeter do that, not just as forward ball carrier hitting it up but almost like a back.’

If you were looking for a back row player with footwork, would you be choosing Stampkar. Stampkar was exactly the player he had in mind when he said: ‘looking at South Africa if you tuck the ball under your arm and run straight  they love that type of thing’.

Nope the stance you and Dave have come up with to save your Stampkar blushes is totally debunked. Just accept it you old tart.

Moz, nothing you are going to say will change Ou Maaiks mind...to much invested in perpetual disagreement with you ... too late to relent.

IMO, Stander would have given his front teeth for the opportunity to close out his test career playing for the Lions in South Africa. It's a no-brainer...there can be no sane reason for him not to be available purely on choice...it doesn't make any sense...

Mike’s obsession became starkly apparent when he he inadvertently posted that I had beaten Tsitsipas.

Didn't know you played tennis on that level...or did you beat him with a golf club...and whatever for?

He posted this on May 7, although he has subsequently corrected it:

‘The way  in which Mozart beat Tsitsipas was  probably due to match fatigue of Tsitsipas than any other reason’

I corrected that  ages ago/   For the rest BS Alert.   .   

Draad 

I am looking for a bookmaker to place a bet that the Roland Garross final will be between Runlev and Tsitsipas. and Rublev  this year,    Any suggestions?     

No Maaik, I don't gamble...

Rublev will not make the final. Save your money Mike!

T sitsipas could make the final.

How do you know that Beeno? 

Been-ou plays tennis, the Old Tart writes (badly) about tennis. 

Writing the truth is unacceptable to  Mozart,    What I write is repeated by Djokovic and Nadal as well.    So because they said the same is writing badly  about tennis?    Same as saying  like you do that White lied about the Stander issue.     The biased  Old Fart is bananas as well - delusional and talking shit all the time based on his rugby, cricket and tennis illiteracy.           

Beeno

I have my doubts about the issue of Federer, Nadal and  Djokovic for very good reason.   this year,  If Federer gets through to Round 3 it will be a huge surprise.   Nadal may run into Rublev who beat him and disgraced him in the Monte Carlo tournament.  He was in trouble in every tournament he played in and even in the two clay court tournaments he played in and won  anyway,   Djokovic has been beaten on clay this year by any player who have tried anything - like Evans  (who was beaten yesterday by Kecmanovic) and Karatsev.   So how will  they  do in Roland Garross?   Neither of us would  know anyway,   

I was right about doubting Thiem as well,  he was beaten yesterday by Andujar-Alba - who sent Federer packing in Geneva 14 days ago,   Expect more surprise results today as well.                        

If any one should know Tsipitas's game it should be you, Mozart...afterall did not you play him successfully a few weeks back...

According to your pal the Old Tart, I did.

‘Expect more surprise results today’......waaaaaaaaahaha....that’s the Old Tart’s sneaky way of teeing up a Federer loss. A win for Federer would be a miracle according to Notsofarmus. Hilariously Fed won in straight sets.

Federer may be the most elegant player to ever grace the game, but for the Old Tart’s tastes he is no longer a seuntjie so he has to be attacked. We have seen this all before.

BS Alert!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  

Reduced to repeating an empty line, the Old Tart in trouble.

BS Alert  - the lying old fart is stinking more than ever before!!!!!!!!!!!!    `   

Poor ol Dumb Fuck Dave ... still stumbling around in the dark ... 

And we do have a surprise result today.....the Old Tart was right. But hold it the surprise was his pick for the final Rublev, his  pick to win it all, crashed out in the first round. Meanwhile Nadal, like Federer cruised through in straight sets.

The Tart knows his tennis....hahaha.

Hmmmm ... yes ... he may know his tennis ... but he still doesn't know his arse from his elbow ... 

I doubt that'll ever change.

Notsofarmus.......where are you?