The moment he went off the Bok scrum improved like magic. He was such a negative that the Springbok squad suffered massively whenever he played .
Coach57,555 posts
18 Jul 2015, 13:00
#1
18 Jul 2015, 13:00#1
It is now clear what a negative impact Matfield is in Tight 5
Started by clevermike2 REPLIES208 VIEWS· 18 Jul 2015, 13:00
Club Pro471 posts
18 Jul 2015, 15:07
#2
18 Jul 2015, 15:07#2
Broken TV?
The complete scrum dominance disappeared when Matfield went off, with only the first scrum with Lood sort of even. After that the Wallabies were incorrectly penalised a few times. When the useless (according to you) Jannie and Beast was subbed there was nothing left in the scrums...
Make no mistake, Lood was twice the player Matfield was in the loose, but he was crap in the lineouts and the scrums...
The complete scrum dominance disappeared when Matfield went off, with only the first scrum with Lood sort of even. After that the Wallabies were incorrectly penalised a few times. When the useless (according to you) Jannie and Beast was subbed there was nothing left in the scrums...
Make no mistake, Lood was twice the player Matfield was in the loose, but he was crap in the lineouts and the scrums...
Captain30,741 posts
18 Jul 2015, 15:10
#3
18 Jul 2015, 15:10#3
Lood was twice the player useless Matfield is
— END OF THREAD —
